Andre,
Martin,
Thanks for your reply:
Answer to your previous question: 1). since the loadbalance haven't been
triggered, so I think we can ignore it now.
2). You are right "missing uri map" is a debug information, but in the above
code I pasted, it will return DECLINED, which is actually an error case.
3). the hostname doesn’t match with the configuration file, since I modified
some conf, so I tried to copy the original one used on 1.2.32. sorry for the
confusion.
4). I don't know ajp12, it's not triggered yet in my testing.
I attached the configuration files in my lab, this setting worked if using
mod_jk 1.2.23 release. If I replace the mod_jk.so with the version 1.2.40,
then it failed to open the page /sso/lsm/lsm.jnlp ( I got "Not Found The
requested URL /sso/lsm/lsm.jnlp was not found on this server.").
I opened the debug of mod_jk, I noticed it added into some uri work map and
also it can be dumped into jk.log:
[Wed Mar 16 12:47:17.965 2016] [12184:139831250073568] [debug]
uri_worker_map_add::jk_uri_worker_map.c (863): exact rule '/sso=csajboss'
source 'JkMount' was added
[Wed Mar 16 12:47:17.965 2016] [12184:139831250073568] [debug]
uri_worker_map_add::jk_uri_worker_map.c (854): wildchar rule '/sso/*=csajboss'
source 'JkMount' was added
...
[Wed Mar 16 12:47:17.974 2016] [12185:139831250073568] [debug]
uri_worker_map_dump::jk_uri_worker_map.c (197): NEXT (1) map #10: uri=/sso/*
worker=csajboss context=/sso/* source=JkMount type=Wildchar len=6
[Wed Mar 16 12:47:17.974 2016] [12185:139831250073568] [debug]
uri_worker_map_dump::jk_uri_worker_map.c (197): NEXT (1) map #20: uri=/sso
worker=csajboss context=/sso source=JkMount type=Exact len=4
But later when I tried to open the sso/lsm/lsm.jnlp, it should match the
wildchar /sso/* uri map. But it was failed, from the code, it's failed in
mod_jk.c jk_translate method()
The conf->wu_map was null(don't know why ??),
if (!conf->uw_map) {
if (JK_IS_DEBUG_LEVEL(conf->log))
jk_log(conf->log, JK_LOG_DEBUG,
"missing uri map for %s:%s",
conf->s->server_hostname ? conf->s->server_hostname
: "_default_",
r->uri);
return DECLINED;
}
else {
rule_extension_t *e;
worker = map_uri_to_worker_ext(conf->uw_map, r->uri,
NULL, &e, NULL, conf->log);
rconf->rule_extensions = e;
ap_set_module_config(r->request_config, &jk_module, rconf);
}
Do I need to change some configuration after upgrade to 1.2.40?
Thanks,
Eric.
-Original Message-
From: André Warnier (tomcat) [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 7:50 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: [COMMERCIAL] Re: [COMMERCIAL] Re: Need Help: - jk doesn't work after
upgrade to1.2.40 from 1.2.23
Hi Eric.
A couple of things :
1) Martin is right, in the sense that if a "worker" is mentioned in the
loadbalancer configuration ("balance_workers"), then normally you should /not/
also list it in the list of individual "workers" in the "worker.list" directive.
2) I am not even sure that you really have a problem : the logfile part that
you are showing, shows "[debug]" lines with the "Missing URI map.." messages.
These are not errors (otherwise they would be marked "[error]"), they are trace
messages allowing you to figure out what is going on when debugging a problem.
A "missing URI map" just indicates that mod_jk is trying to match the URI of
the current request with one of the "JkMount" URI's, and failing *for the
worker which it is now trying to match*. That does not necessarily mean that
it will fail to match this URI with some other worker.
3) the debug messages show a prefix like "IBM001OAM01:". What does that
correspond to ? I do not see this name in the JkMount directives that you show,
nor in the part of workers.properties that you show.
4) I am a bit puzzled by this section :
>>> worker.ajp12.port=8007
>>> worker.ajp12.host=localhost
>>> worker.ajp12.type=ajp12
What is this type "ajp12" ? As far as I know, this does not exist, see
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/workers.html
Mandatory Directives -> type
And finally, do you have a problem, and what is it ?
What really happens when you try to access a URI like
"http://(hostname)/sso/lsm/lsm.jnlp" ?
And could you provide a *complete* list of your (Jk*) configuration directives,
and a complete content of the workers.properties file ?
And maybe a short description as to what you are trying to achieve.
From what you provided so far, it is not very clear which URI's you want to
"load-balance" and which not.
The fact that "it worked before" is no guarantee that what you had before was
entirely correct.
On 14.03.2016 11:47, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> there are two things different from *my* w