Gregor Schneider wrote:
No, in fact the 64-bit-jvm is able to adress (thus use) more memory
than on 32-bit-jvm.
just make sure that a 64-bit-jvm (java-virtual-machine) is installed.
Actually, in machine terms, pointers in a 64-bit system are twice as
wide and thus take up twice as much
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Manuel Trujillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the java 64 bits more memory-eat than 32 bits?
No, in fact the 64-bit-jvm is able to adress (thus use) more memory
than on 32-bit-jvm.
just make sure that a 64-bit-jvm (java-virtual-machine) is installed.
Gregor
--
My experience is also that java likes more memory on 64-bit systems. But I
can't prove or explain it.
Ronald.
On Mon Sep 01 13:41:18 CEST 2008 Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
wrote:
Subject: Ignorance about some things.
Date: Mon Sep 01 13:41:18 CEST 2008
From: Manuel Trujillo
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Ronald Klop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My experience is also that java likes more memory on 64-bit systems. But I
can't prove or explain it.
You can tell Java exactly how much memory to use:
Have a look at the -Xms and -XMX-parameters for the JVM (java -X will
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 16:05, Gregor Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Ronald Klop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My experience is also that java likes more memory on 64-bit systems. But I
can't prove or explain it.
You can tell Java exactly how much memory to use:
From: Ronald Klop [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
My experience is also that java likes more memory on 64-bit
systems. But I can't prove or explain it.
I would expect 64-bit Java to use 64-bit object pointers, and 32-bit Java to
use 32-bit object pointers. Given how often object pointers occur in
- Original Message -
From: Manuel Trujillo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2008 1:41 PM
Subject: Ignorance about some things.
Hi!
Excuse me if this question is not correct for this list (also about my
bad english...).
I have two machines
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Johnny Kewl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The guys tell me that the JRE did have a memory heap allocation bug... in
pre JRE's 6...
Its not tomcat apparently if you want to play with 64 bit... get the
very latest JRE 6 from SUN direct.
Have fun...
And dont
- Original Message -
From: Gregor Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2008 9:04 PM
Subject: Re: Ignorance about some things.
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Johnny Kewl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The guys tell me
Hello Manuell,
having OutOfMemoryError in your logs doesnt necessary mean that you
are out of memory. OutOfMemory error can be caused by many things, for
example the impossiblity to create a new thread.
What's happening with your tomcat after 50 minutes, do you have any logs?
Also, detailed info
Hi Johnny,
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 9:26 PM, Johnny Kewl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Linux admin guys just knocked off... I'll ask them to explain the details in
the morning...
They just said something about a major/minor heap allocation problem on
earlier JREs
You know these debian dudes...
11 matches
Mail list logo
