RE: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux

2009-12-10 Thread Karthik Nanjangude
same system's which was never any dev delay cause. Regards karthik -Original Message- From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 9:38 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux Karthik Nanjangude wrote: .

Re: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux

2009-12-09 Thread André Warnier
Karthik Nanjangude wrote: ... When something is in Production it really gets pickles to upgrade the Jdk /OS , Realy worried :( Karthik, generally speaking, the gurus on this list - of which I am not - tend to be sceptical about benchmarks. That is because, as Mark indicated in anothe

Re: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux

2009-12-09 Thread David kerber
Karthik Nanjangude wrote: Hi As Andre points out, you also don't give any information on the tests you're running, which makes it difficult to know what you're actually comparing. For example, if your webapp accesses an external database, the version of the database software will make a mass

RE: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux

2009-12-09 Thread Karthik Nanjangude
From: peter.crowth...@googlemail.com [mailto:peter.crowth...@googlemail.com] On Behalf Of Peter Crowther Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 7:43 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux 2009/12/9 Karthik Nanjangude > Same Tomcat 6.0.20 from > > >

Re: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux

2009-12-09 Thread David kerber
Peter Crowther wrote: ... - A much older JVM, I think - this looks like the original 1.5 release, compared to 1.5.0_18 on Linux. - The client VM rather than the server VM is running. I would expect both of these to slow down the Windows box. Especially the client vs server vm, IME. D -

Re: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux

2009-12-09 Thread André Warnier
Karthik Nanjangude wrote: Also, both Windows 2000 and Java 1.5 are in the "no longer supported" Off the topic - Does this mean Every Hardware /S/w for 6 months needs replacement Not really off the topic, if you are talking about comparisons and benchmarks. http://java.sun.com/products/ar

Re: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux

2009-12-09 Thread Pid
On 09/12/2009 14:12, Peter Crowther wrote: 2009/12/9 Karthik Nanjangude Same Tomcat 6.0.20 from http://opensource.become.com/apache/tomcat/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/bin/apache-tomcat-6.0.20.zip OK. RAM is 2 GB on Linux on Windows is 1.5 GB No extra applications are running when the same was

Re: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux

2009-12-09 Thread Peter Crowther
2009/12/9 Karthik Nanjangude > Same Tomcat 6.0.20 from > > > http://opensource.become.com/apache/tomcat/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/bin/apache-tomcat-6.0.20.zip > OK. > RAM is 2 GB on Linux on Windows is 1.5 GB > No extra applications are running when the same was executed > How much of that RAM is

RE: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux

2009-12-09 Thread Karthik Nanjangude
regards karthik -Original Message- From: peter.crowth...@googlemail.com [mailto:peter.crowth...@googlemail.com] On Behalf Of Peter Crowther Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 7:04 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux 2009/12/9 Karthik Nanja

Re: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux

2009-12-09 Thread André Warnier
Karthik Nanjangude wrote: Hi We have deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20on Windows / Linux 1) In case of Windows the "Catalina. out" is not generated in "/log" folder while on Linux the same is generated on every start 2) Tomcat on windows is Slow compared to Linux in request

Re: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux

2009-12-09 Thread Peter Crowther
2009/12/9 Karthik Nanjangude > We have deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20on Windows / Linux > Just to check: in both cases, you downloaded the same installation files from http://tomcat.apache.org and installed them? Exactly the same JVM revision on both machines? Exactly the same hardware co