Re: Tomcat Issue = org.apache.tomcat.util.net.Acceptor.run Socket accept failed. java.io.IOException: Duplicate accept detected.

On 17/02/2023 07:53, Patkar Omkar Anant wrote: Hi Mark Thomas, Few queries from my side. 1) You have indicated it could be false positive ? But how do we confirm that ? Also, Its not just a warning, the requests are not processed any more. The bug referenced in the error message affects part

RE: Tomcat Issue = org.apache.tomcat.util.net.Acceptor.run Socket accept failed. java.io.IOException: Duplicate accept detected.

hem to confirm. -Original Message- From: Mark Thomas Sent: 16 February 2023 01:13 To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: Tomcat Issue = org.apache.tomcat.util.net.Acceptor.run Socket accept failed. java.io.IOException: Duplicate accept detected. On 15/02/2023 12:24, Patkar Omkar Anant wrote

Re: Tomcat Issue = org.apache.tomcat.util.net.Acceptor.run Socket accept failed. java.io.IOException: Duplicate accept detected.

On 15/02/2023 12:24, Patkar Omkar Anant wrote: Hi All, We are facing an issue with Apache Tomcat 9. I had posted this issue in Bugzilla forum, and from there I was re-directed here. The link to the bug is = https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66476 I will elaborate the details here

Tomcat Issue = org.apache.tomcat.util.net.Acceptor.run Socket accept failed. java.io.IOException: Duplicate accept detected.

Hi All, We are facing an issue with Apache Tomcat 9. I had posted this issue in Bugzilla forum, and from there I was re-directed here. The link to the bug is = https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66476 I will elaborate the details here: - -- ERROR: -

Re: Tomcat issue

Thank you very much for your assistance. Regards Kerapetse On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Olaf Kock wrote: > > > Am 17.03.2017 um 09:44 schrieb Kerapetse Phorano: > > Ok i see that. > > So if that is the case how do i access tomcat outside the localhost? > > > > Regards, > > Kerapetse > > >

Re: Tomcat issue

Am 17.03.2017 um 09:44 schrieb Kerapetse Phorano: > Ok i see that. > So if that is the case how do i access tomcat outside the localhost? > > Regards, > Kerapetse > > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Olaf Kock wrote: > >> Am 17.03.2017 um 07:04 schrieb Kerapetse Phorano: >>> I have set up an "ad

Re: Tomcat issue

Ok i see that. So if that is the case how do i access tomcat outside the localhost? Regards, Kerapetse On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Olaf Kock wrote: > > Am 17.03.2017 um 07:04 schrieb Kerapetse Phorano: > > I have set up an "admin" user with a password. The manager runs properly > on > loca

Re: Tomcat issue

Am 17.03.2017 um 07:04 schrieb Kerapetse Phorano: > I have set up an "admin" user with a password. The manager runs properly on > > localhost but the error comes if it is accessed from a different PC. The manager app is deliberately preconfigured to only be available from localhost. If you open w

Re: Tomcat issue

I have set up an "admin" user with a password. The manager runs properly on localhost but the error comes if it is accessed from a different PC. Kerapetse On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 6:14 PM, Christopher Schultz < ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA2

Re: Tomcat issue

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Kerapetse, On 3/16/17 9:24 AM, Kerapetse Phorano wrote: > Hello, > > Please assist. We have tomcat 9.0.0.M18 > installed and > running successfully on Ubuntu Server. We are experiencing an issue

Tomcat issue

Hello, Please assist. We have tomcat 9.0.0.M18 installed and running successfully on Ubuntu Server. We are experiencing an issue when we try to run tomcat manager from a different PC. We receive the following error message: HTTP Status 403 – For

Re: Tomcat Issue with iplanet 7.0.15

Senapati, Naresh (GE Healthcare, consultant) wrote: Hi, Summary of information provided : Server A Server B Hardware : SOLARIS ZONEHardware : PROLIANT DL380 G7 OS: Solaris 10 OS: Re

Tomcat Issue with iplanet 7.0.15

Hi, Summary of information provided : Server A Server B Hardware : SOLARIS ZONEHardware : PROLIANT DL380 G7 OS: Solaris 10 OS: Red Hat Linux 5.6 JVM : 6.0.25

Re: Apache Accessing Tomcat Issue

On 30.03.2013 21:53, Chris Arnold wrote: > See above and ended up having to comment this out as it is not supported in > the version of mod_jk i am using. > Apache finally started after commenting those out and changing the port. And > i can now access http://share.domain.com > Ranier, thank you

Re: Apache Accessing Tomcat Issue

On 30.03.2013 12:43, Chris Arnold wrote >>The following param doesn't exist in your old version: > # error_escalation_time: seconds, default = recover_time/2 (=30) > # Determines, how fast a detected error should switch from > # local error state to global error state > # Since: 1.2.28 > worker.b

Re: Apache Accessing Tomcat Issue

On 30.03.2013 12:43, Chris Arnold wrote: > Here is the modified virtualhost file: > > ServerName share.domain.com > > #RewriteEngine On > #RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/share/ > #RewriteCond %{HTTPS} on > #RewriteRule ^/. http://share.domain.com/share/ [P] > JkMount

Re: Apache Accessing Tomcat Issue

On 29.03.2013 18:02, Chris Arnold wrote: >http://share.domain.com and get the required results (which is >http://share.domain.com/share) >>Let's stick to mod_jk for the moment. I think you are close. OK Here is the modified virtualhost file: ServerName share.domain.com #RewriteEng

Re: Apache Accessing Tomcat Issue

On 29.03.2013 18:02, Chris Arnold wrote: > This thread is getting kinda messy so i am going to snip a bunch of stuff and > answer your latest info. Good. >> So mod_proxy is loaded but you don't want to use it to access alfresco, >> instead just mod_jk, right? Then don't use any ReWriteRule with

Re: Apache Accessing Tomcat Issue

This thread is getting kinda messy so i am going to snip a bunch of stuff and answer your latest info. >So mod_proxy is loaded but you don't want to use it to access alfresco, >instead just mod_jk, right? Then don't use any ReWriteRule with the [P} >flag or any Proxy... directive. No, if this c

Re: Apache Accessing Tomcat Issue

On 29.03.2013 13:10, Chris Arnold wrote: > On 29.03.2013 00:24, Chris Arnold wrote: >> >> # The following line mounts all JSP files and the /servlet/ uri to tomcat >> #JkMount /servlets-examples/servlet/* ajp13 >> JkMount /share/*.jsp ajp13 > >>> Note that you only forward JSP-Requests

Re: Apache Accessing Tomcat Issue

>>What's the request you send? i assume you are asking for the link? Which is http://share.domain.com >>What's the expected response a login page >>and what's the actual response? Now, it is a 403: [Fri Mar 29 08:15:24 2013] [error] [client pub ip] Directory index forbidden by Options directive:

Re: Apache Accessing Tomcat Issue

On 29.03.2013 00:24, Chris Arnold wrote: > > # The following line mounts all JSP files and the /servlet/ uri to tomcat > #JkMount /servlets-examples/servlet/* ajp13 > JkMount /share/*.jsp ajp13 >>Note that you only forward JSP-Requests here. might be OK, depending on >>the application

Re: Apache Accessing Tomcat Issue

On 29.03.2013 00:24, Chris Arnold wrote: > Apache Tomcat/7.0.30 on SLES11 SP2. I am trying to configure access to a > webapp using http://share.domain.com. This webapp uses port 8080 and works > fine from inside the LAN. However, we have an apache2 server acting as a > proxy and we want users to

Re: Apache Accessing Tomcat Issue

On 29/03/2013 10:29 AM, "Chris Arnold" wrote: > > Apache Tomcat/7.0.30 on SLES11 SP2. I am trying to configure access to a webapp using http://share.domain.com. This webapp uses port 8080 and works fine from inside the LAN. However, we have an apache2 server acting as a proxy and we want users to

Apache Accessing Tomcat Issue

Apache Tomcat/7.0.30 on SLES11 SP2. I am trying to configure access to a webapp using http://share.domain.com. This webapp uses port 8080 and works fine from inside the LAN. However, we have an apache2 server acting as a proxy and we want users to not have to type in a port number. Now when acc

Re: Tomcat issue (Solaris 10)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Amit, Please keep conversations on-list to benefit others. On 9/8/2011 3:57 PM, Anand, Amit (Contractor) wrote: > Thank you very much for all your help! Like I said, not very good > with Tomcat. So this patch should fix this CVE-2011-3109 (Bug > 516

Re: Tomcat issue (Solaris 10)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Amit, Please keep conversations on-list to benefit others. On 9/8/2011 3:57 PM, Anand, Amit (Contractor) wrote: > Thank you very much for all your help! Like I said, not very good > with Tomcat. So this patch should fix this CVE-2011-3109 (Bug > 51

Re: Tomcat issue (Solaris 10)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Amit, On 9/7/2011 6:38 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote: > I've been trying to determine if using an AJP "secret" will thwart > this kind of attack. I suspect it will, but I can't get my TC to > take a secret just now (see my post under separate cover).

Re: Tomcat issue (Solaris 10)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Amit, On 9/7/2011 2:30 PM, Anand, Amit (Contractor) wrote: > Kinda new to tomcat but have a couple quick questions which came > up regarding CVE-2011-3109 (Bug 51698). > > Any timeline to when stable release of 6.0.34 is supposed to be > released?

Tomcat issue (Solaris 10)

All, Kinda new to tomcat but have a couple quick questions which came up regarding CVE-2011-3109 (Bug 51698). Questions: Any timeline to when stable release of 6.0.34 is supposed to be released? Also what does "in trunk" specifically mean? Does that mean if I download say version 6.0.29 as o

Re: tomcat issue with DBCP connection pool

Are you sure it is due to the stored procedure? You can get that error if you don't close all database objects. Make sure you close resultsets, statements, etc in a "finally" block throughout all your code. On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Propes, Barry L wrote: > And to thisis it absolute

RE: tomcat issue with DBCP connection pool

And to thisis it absolutely necessary to use the SYS_REFCURSOR in Oracle? I use several packages and procesures and never use this! Granted, I may have many less records than you in your DB table, but I was just wondering. Perhaps it is. > BTW, my application calls a stored procedure which

Re: tomcat issue with DBCP connection pool

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 To whom it may concern, On 3/21/2011 6:59 AM, the_biswa wrote: > I've written a thread program where in the run method I'm opening an > HTTPURLConnection and feeding a valid input and reading the server response. Do you launch this thread during norm

tomcat issue with DBCP connection pool

context: http://old.nabble.com/tomcat-issue-with-DBCP-connection-pool-tp31199494p31199494.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additio

Re: Tomcat issue : open a office 2007 document

Christopher Schultz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 To whom it may concern, On 1/15/2010 3:55 PM, soulSnatched wrote: I am trying to open a office 2007 document a .xlsx file Soulsnatched.. combine Christopher's answer with my earlier one, and I am sure that the answer

Re: Tomcat issue : open a office 2007 document

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 To whom it may concern, On 1/15/2010 3:55 PM, soulSnatched wrote: > I am trying to open a office 2007 document a .xlsx file Technically speaking, you are trying to send an Office 2007 document to a client, and that client is trying to open the file.

Re: Tomcat issue : open a office 2007 document

ile extension matches the format of the file" Hi. The very first thing to say, is that this is most probably (99.99%) not a Tomcat issue. Since you are under Windows, I will presume that you are using IE as a browser. If that is the case, the first thing you should do is to get an IE ad

Tomcat issue : open a office 2007 document

the format of the file" -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Tomcat-issue-%3A-open-a-office-2007-document-tp27183444p27183444.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

RE: Baffling tomcat issue

Austausch von Informationen und entfaltet keine > rechtliche Bindungswirkung. Aufgrund der leichten Manipulierbarkeit von > E-Mails koennen wir keine Haftung fuer den Inhalt uebernehmen. > > > > > > >> Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:39:28 -0700 >> From: pra

RE: Baffling tomcat issue

koennen wir keine Haftung fuer den Inhalt uebernehmen. > Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:39:28 -0700 > From: prasadmpa...@gmail.com > To: users@tomcat.apache.org > Subject: Baffling tomcat issue > > > Hi, > > I have deployed tomcat on Redhat 9 and everything seemed to

Baffling tomcat issue

? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Baffling-tomcat-issue-tp25733453p25733453.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For

Re: Tomcat issue

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mark, On 6/4/2009 7:42 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > Yadav, Sushma wrote: >> We are using Tomcat5.5 on LINUX plaftform.Tomcat is used by web client >> of our one of the application known as Serena Dimensions. > > That could be one of 28 different 5.5.x ve

Re: Tomcat issue

Yadav, Sushma wrote: > We are using Tomcat5.5 on LINUX plaftform.Tomcat is used by web client > of our one of the application known as Serena Dimensions. That could be one of 28 different 5.5.x versions. Which one is it? > From past few days out tomcat shutdowns on daily basis or withinh an > int

RE: Help with a Tomcat issue???

List Subject: Re: Help with a Tomcat issue??? -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jason, On 4/6/2009 6:33 PM, Jason Smith wrote: > Sun's implementation of HttpURLConnector apparently creates a new > ChunkedOutputStream every time you call .getOutputStream(). That's obn

Re: Help with a Tomcat issue???

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jason, On 4/6/2009 6:33 PM, Jason Smith wrote: > Sun's implementation of HttpURLConnector apparently creates a new > ChunkedOutputStream every time you call .getOutputStream(). That's obnoxious and completely unexpected. Latest version of Java, huh?

RE: Help with a Tomcat issue???

Will do. -Original Message- From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 8:15 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Help with a Tomcat issue??? Jason Smith wrote: > As follow-up, I guess I would have to count this as a core Java API bug, > since th

Re: Help with a Tomcat issue???

Jason Smith wrote: > As follow-up, I guess I would have to count this as a core Java API bug, > since the high-level functions (HttpURLConnection) allow you to routinely > emit bad markup. > > However, wouldn't it be prudent in Tomcat to recognize that something has > gone wrong with the method

RE: Help with a Tomcat issue???

esday, April 07, 2009 2:40 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Help with a Tomcat issue??? Jason Smith wrote: > Solved. You gave me a clue that helped solve it, though Tomcat could handle > this better (not put '0 POST' in for the method name in the first place). > &

Re: Help with a Tomcat issue???

Jason Smith wrote: > Solved. You gave me a clue that helped solve it, though Tomcat could handle > this better (not put '0 POST' in for the method name in the first place). > > Sun's implementation of HttpURLConnector apparently creates a new > ChunkedOutputStream every time you call .getOutp

RE: Help with a Tomcat issue???

--- From: Jason Smith [mailto:jsm...@infotrustgroup.com] Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 1:47 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Help with a Tomcat issue??? I'll see if I can set up a working example. And I didn't mean to say "proxy," not that there is one. We aren't using

RE: Help with a Tomcat issue???

rs List Subject: RE: Help with a Tomcat issue??? Just Tomcat, no proxy. And I agree, that isn't the way you'd want to fix it ultimately, but I was experimenting to find out what worked. You'd ultimately like to not see the '0' at the beginning of the buffer. I f

Re: Help with a Tomcat issue???

Jason Smith wrote: > Just Tomcat, no proxy. > > And I agree, that isn't the way you'd want to fix it ultimately, but I was > experimenting to find out what worked. You'd ultimately like to not see the > '0' at the beginning of the buffer. I found the place where it was getting > copied to t

RE: Help with a Tomcat issue???

-Original Message- From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org] Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 1:18 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Help with a Tomcat issue??? Jason Smith wrote: > I have intercepted the socket InputStream (in Http11BaseProtocol) and looked > at the data coming in. It is

Re: Help with a Tomcat issue???

Jason Smith wrote: > I have intercepted the socket InputStream (in Http11BaseProtocol) and looked > at the data coming in. It is what I expect ('POST .'). Yes, let me repeat > that, the data coming in from the socket is good. I've visually inspected > it, and it matches the spec. It isn't ju

Help with a Tomcat issue???

Sorry for the spam if you are on both newsgroups.  I have been asked to move this to the user's group rather than the developers group.  I still think it's a developer issue, but I am more interested in actually finding answers than arguing the point. I am using a standard UrlHttpConnection to

RE: Tomcat Issue

Hey martin, Thanks for ur quick response... but what exactly do I need to do ?? Thanks & Regards Ritwik Kumar -Original Message- From: Martin Gainty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2008 7:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Tomcat Issue Hi Kumar

Tomcat Issue

Hello, I have a JSP page which gets displayed quite properly if Weblogic server is used. But the same JSP has some issues like (html character getting showed and unclosed tags) when Tomcat 5.5 is used. The JSP file and its corresponding HTML file are quite big, so I guess I need to change som

RE: Tomcat Issue with HPUX

| From: pkt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Sent: Friday, 10 August, 2007 00:38 | | One option is that to increase the max thread per process limit of HP to | high value, but administrators are not very convinced with this idea | | Any pointers on this issue. Have your admins check out the "Java Out

Re: Tomcat Issue with HPUX

David Delbecq wrote: En l'instant précis du 10/08/07 10:34, Rainer Jung s'exprimait en ces termes: The question about Tomcat serving no more requests, once you reached the OS thread limit: if a new request comes in, the listening thread serves the request and a new thread is taken out of the po

Re: Tomcat Issue with HPUX

moryError. After >>>>> this the >>>>> thread are killed ( probably by the OS) and then the thread count >>>>> comes >>>>> back >>>>> to around 27 but tomcat does not process any new request any more. >>>>> Wha

Re: Tomcat Issue with HPUX

s limit of HP to high value, but administrators are not very convinced with this idea Any pointers on this issue. Thanks and Regards Pankaj Tiwari -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Tomcat-Issue-with-HPUX-tf4246754.html#a12085566 Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list

Re: Tomcat Issue with HPUX

s that to increase the max thread per process limit of HP to >>> high value, but administrators are not very convinced with this idea >>> >>> Any pointers on this issue. >>> >>> Thanks and Regards >>> Pankaj Tiwari >>> -- >>> View this

Re: Tomcat Issue with HPUX

r process limit of HP to >> high value, but administrators are not very convinced with this idea >> >> Any pointers on this issue. >> >> Thanks and Regards >> Pankaj Tiwari >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Tomcat-Issue-wit

Re: Tomcat Issue with HPUX

; > Any pointers on this issue. > > Thanks and Regards > Pankaj Tiwari > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Tomcat-Issue-with-HPUX-tf4246754.html#a12085566 > Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > -

Tomcat Issue with HPUX

this issue. Thanks and Regards Pankaj Tiwari -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Tomcat-Issue-with-HPUX-tf4246754.html#a12085566 Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To start a new

Re: TOMCAT ISSUE: System.Exit

nce the 'stopServer' method is intended for a stand-alone TC, I'm going to guess that you won't get much developer interest in removing the System.exit calls. > > ----- Original Message - > From: "Pid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Tomcat Us

RE: TOMCAT ISSUE: System.Exit

> From: Fargusson.Alan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: TOMCAT ISSUE: System.Exit > > Is System.exit implemented in Tomcat? I thought System.exit > is implemented in the JVM. It's part of the JRE. Tomcat merely makes use of it in a few places. - Chuck TH

RE: TOMCAT ISSUE: System.Exit

Is System.exit implemented in Tomcat? I thought System.exit is implemented in the JVM. -Original Message- From: Johnny Kewl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 11:47 AM To: Tomcat Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TOMCAT ISSUE: System.Exit Ok... beginning

RE: TOMCAT ISSUE: System.Exit

> From: Johnny Kewl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: TOMCAT ISSUE: System.Exit > > yes it is a kludge, and I doubt very much whether changing > anything in catalina.policy will do anything in this case... It's certainly not a kludge; one of the primary functions o

Re: TOMCAT ISSUE: System.Exit

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Johnny, Johnny Kewl wrote: > Ok... beginning to think I'm the only one reading here... yes it is a > kludge, and I doubt very much whether changing anything in > catalina.policy will do anything in this case... I'm not expert (never used SecurityMana

Re: TOMCAT ISSUE: System.Exit

hing to think about - Original Message - From: "Pid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Users List" Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 8:04 PM Subject: Re: TOMCAT ISSUE: System.Exit Johnny Kewl wrote: Ha ha... I think this is a kludge, Using a SecurityManager

Re: TOMCAT ISSUE: System.Exit

- Original Message - From: "Peter Crowther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Users List" Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 6:21 PM Subject: RE: TOMCAT ISSUE: System.Exit From: Johnny Kewl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Imagine I make a library for you... and your u

Re: TOMCAT ISSUE: System.Exit

hich to me is wrong... but hey, I'll try it. - Original Message - From: "Peter Crowther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Users List" Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 6:21 PM Subject: RE: TOMCAT ISSUE: System.Exit From: Johnny Kewl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: TOMCAT ISSUE: System.Exit

> From: Johnny Kewl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Imagine I make a library for you... and your user application > does something > wrong... and then my library calls System.Exit and shuts down > the JVM... how > you going to fix that with a security manager?? The security manager can prevent th

Re: TOMCAT ISSUE: System.Exit

security manager?? - Original Message - From: "Pid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Users List" Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 2:54 PM Subject: Re: TOMCAT ISSUE: System.Exit Look up 'SecurityManager'. p Johnny Kewl wrote: I'm busy having

RE: TOMCAT ISSUE: System.Exit

> From: Johnny Kewl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: TOMCAT ISSUE: System.Exit > > TOMCAT ISSUE: System.exit(1)... > In an embedded application, these System.exit(1) kill the > entire application. Wouldn't you normally control that by proper settings in your j

Re: TOMCAT ISSUE: System.Exit

for the changes, I'm making a modified Tomcat prototype called WildCat, so anyone interested can play with that. TOMCAT ISSUE: System.exit(1), In Catalina -> public void stopServer(String[] arguments) } catch (IOException e) { log.error("Catalina.stop: &

TOMCAT ISSUE: System.Exit

rototype called WildCat... so anyone interested can play with that. TOMCAT ISSUE: System.exit(1)... In Catalina -> public void stopServer(String[] arguments) } catch (IOException e) { log.error("Catalina.stop: ", e); //System.exit(1); //MODIFIED

Apache Tomcat issue

Hello, I have a very strange issue regarding my Apache/Tomcat configuration. The symptom is that when a user is trying to connect to a non balanced web application (i.e. /setup or /stech) the initial request can take up to 120 seconds to respond; any request after that replies very quickly,