James,
You could put the stunnel into a while loop that makes it.
perhaps you could send yourself an email each time it closed ?
stunnel is probably the easiest to setup.
I had written a secure version of mod_ajp for apache 1.3 (ie years ago)
which did the whole ssl encryption of the traffic
I have done some goog'ling on IPSec and VPN and I have found three
possibilities:
1) OpenSSH and Port Forwarding
2) OpenVPN
3) Stunnel (thanks little voice)
What concerns me about all three options is error handling. If my OpenSSH or
OpenVPN or Stunnel connection failed/timed out, the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James,
James Ellis wrote:
| I have done some goog'ling on IPSec and VPN and I have found three
| possibilities:
|
| 1) OpenSSH and Port Forwarding
|
| 2) OpenVPN
|
| 3) Stunnel (thanks little voice)
|
| What concerns me about all three options is
cough stunnel /cough
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 18:39 -0800, David Rees wrote:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 9:26 AM, James Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you think that little hollow voice can clarify how IPSec would solve this
problem by giving an example of a software that I could implement to
A hollow voice whispers, IPSec.
--
Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Typically when a software vendor says that a product is intuitive he
means the exact opposite.
pgpXHb0gRtjuo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
or mod_proxy_ajp - encryption
benefits? A hollow voice whispers, IPSec. -- Mark H. Wood, Lead
System Programmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Typically when a software vendor says
that a product is intuitive he means the exact opposite.
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 9:26 AM, James Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you think that little hollow voice can clarify how IPSec would solve this
problem by giving an example of a software that I could implement to
accomplish this?
Google IPSec and VPN and you will find your answer.
-Dave
I know that mod_jk is the battle tested connector between Apache and Tomcat,
but as I understand it the SSL connection generally terminates at the Apache
web server and the traffic between Apache and Tomcat (to the AJP connector) is
unencrypted. Two questions:
1) Does mod_proxy_ajp provide
James Ellis schrieb:
I know that mod_jk is the battle tested connector between Apache and
Tomcat, but as I understand it the SSL connection generally
terminates at the Apache web server and the traffic between Apache
and Tomcat (to the AJP connector) is unencrypted. Two questions:
1) Does
Inline:
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 18:16:24 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp - encryption benefits?
James Ellis schrieb:
I know that mod_jk is the battle tested connector between Apache and
Tomcat, but as I understand it the SSL
James Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inline:
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 18:16:24 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp - encryption benefits?
James Ellis schrieb:
I know that mod_jk is the battle
Inline:
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp - encryption benefits?
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 15:31:21 -0800
James Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inline:
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 18:16:24 +0100
From
: Sunday, March 02, 2008 7:15 PM
Subject: RE: mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp - encryption benefits?
Inline:
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp - encryption benefits?
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 15:31:21 -0800
James Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Martin Gainty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PCI-DSS calls for encryption on all channels where payment information will
be transmitted is the configuration described here non PCI-DSS compliant?
No, PCI-DSS calls for encryption of card data across open, public
14 matches
Mail list logo
