On 08/10/2021 11:43, Me Self wrote:
I would like to test a custom tomcat valve with tomcat-embed and junit. Is
that possible?
Found a few tomcat-embed samples on the web but most seem to only deal with
setting up a webapp - something along the lines:
@BeforeAll
public static void setup
I would like to test a custom tomcat valve with tomcat-embed and junit. Is
that possible?
Found a few tomcat-embed samples on the web but most seem to only deal with
setting up a webapp - something along the lines:
@BeforeAll
public static void setup() throws LifecycleException {
Tomcat tomcat
ng the certificates from latest tomcat source code
> (https://github.com/apache/tomcat/tree/7.0.x/test/org/apache/tomcat/util/net).
>
> Please let me know if there is any other way to resolve this issue without
> downloading the latest certificate once they are expired.
Set the da
omcat/tree/7.0.x/test/org/apache/tomcat/util/net).
Please let me know if there is any other way to resolve this issue without
downloading the latest certificate once they are expired.
Thanks and Regards,
Ankitha
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday
On 23/03/2020 07:18, Udupa, Ankitha K wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are facing issue while triggering Ant Test with Tomcat 7.0.84
That version is over two years old and has a number of known security
vulnerabilities that are likely to apply to a typical installation.
The Tomcat community
Hi,
We are facing issue while triggering Ant Test with Tomcat 7.0.84 on HP UX IA/PA
architecture with Java ( Java 7.0 in IA and Java 6.0 in PA).
Please kindly help me to resolve these failures.
TEST-org.apache.catalina.comet.TestCometProcessor.NIO.txt:ERROR:null
TEST
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2019 3:54 AM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Performance test with Tomcat 9 shows increased cpu/disk usage
because of repeated opening/closing of jars in WEB-INF/lib
On 09/10/2019 22:58, Rhuberg,Anthony wrote
imply that.
-Original Message-
From: john.e.gr...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2019 6:54 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: RE: Performance test with Tomcat 9 shows increased cpu/disk usage
because of repeated opening/closing of jars in WEB-INF/lib
Tony
Tony,
> -Original Message-
> From: Rhuberg,Anthony
> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2019 5:22 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Performance test with Tomcat 9 shows increased cpu/disk usage
> because of repeated opening/closing of jars in WEB-INF/lib
the related application jars - which if happening
enough can cause the high cpu/disk usage as we observed in our performance
tests.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2019 3:54 AM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Performance test with Tomcat
were closed was low enough that the
performance impact was not noticed.
Mark
>
> Thanks,
> Tony
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas
> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2019 5:32 PM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Performance test with Tomcat 9
I have not seen the trace message for modified()... So my understanding of this
is wrong.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Carter-Brown
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2019 4:42 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Performance test with Tomcat 9 shows increased cpu/disk usage
because
: Performance test with Tomcat 9 shows increased cpu/disk usage
because of repeated opening/closing of jars in WEB-INF/lib
On 09/10/2019 21:03, Rhuberg,Anthony wrote:
> This seems to alleviate the issue... in context.xml (sc-test#sc.xml)
> swallowOutput="true" backgroundProcessorDelay=&q
On 09/10/2019 21:03, Rhuberg,Anthony wrote:
> This seems to alleviate the issue... in context.xml (sc-test#sc.xml)
> backgroundProcessorDelay="90">
>
> Not sure if this is the context reload trigger... i.e. the
> webappLoader.backgroundProcess method is triggered e
files on the filesystem are not changing - unless there is something
> happening in the classes folder.
>
> Thanks
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas
> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2019 3:56 PM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Performance test with Tomcat 9 s
, 2019 3:56 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Performance test with Tomcat 9 shows increased cpu/disk usage
because of repeated opening/closing of jars in WEB-INF/lib
On 09/10/2019 20:08, Rhuberg,Anthony wrote:
> On the other thread: Is this genuine class loading (in which c
This seems to alleviate the issue... in context.xml (sc-test#sc.xml)
Not sure if this is the context reload trigger... i.e. the
webappLoader.backgroundProcess method is triggered every 90 seconds... the
reloadable property on Context is NOT set (default = false). So then how does
modified
cache it.
> -Original Message-
> From: Rhuberg,Anthony
> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2019 2:53 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Performance test with Tomcat 9 shows increased cpu/disk usage
> because of repeated opening/closing of jars in WEB-INF/lib
>
> Ju
, 2019 2:53 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Performance test with Tomcat 9 shows increased cpu/disk usage
because of repeated opening/closing of jars in WEB-INF/lib
Just noticed another thread on this topic: RE: Tomcat discards and reloads the
jar files from the webapps folder.
Setting
@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Performance test with Tomcat 9 shows increased cpu/disk usage because
of repeated opening/closing of jars in WEB-INF/lib
Background:
In the last few months we migrated our web application from Tomcat 7.0.55 to
Tomcat 9.0.19 (26). That transition was relatively
Background:
In the last few months we migrated our web application from Tomcat 7.0.55 to
Tomcat 9.0.19 (26). That transition was relatively straightforward until we
reviewed the results of our performance tests. Those tests showed an increase
in CPU usage and disk I/O on our Windows 2012
ative
> available. I work with macOS and install programs with homebrew. For the last
> updates of Tomcat 9 I updated the Homebrew Formula and wanted to do the same
> for Tomcat Native [1].
>
> During the update of the formula I stumbled over the requirement that now a
>
. For the last
updates of Tomcat 9 I updated the Homebrew Formula and wanted to do the same
for Tomcat Native [1].
During the update of the formula I stumbled over the requirement that now a
test for the formula is necessary [2].
Unfortunately, I have no idea how such a test could look like
]
org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke Failed
authenticate() test
13-Feb-2019 14:07:56.816 FINE [http-nio-8080-exec-5]
org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke Security
checking request GET /favicon.ico
13-Feb-2019 14:07:56.816 FINE [http-nio-8080-exec-5
sun.security.krb5.internal.crypto.Aes256CtsHmacSha1EType
>> >>>Delegated Creds have pname=myusern...@mycompany.com
>> sname=krbtgt/mycompany@mycompany.com authtime=null
>> starttime=20190208095329Z
>> endtime=20190208195235ZrenewTill=20190215095
[Krb5LoginModule]: logged out Subject
08-Feb-2019 11:26:27.415 FINE [https-jsse-nio-443-exec-5]
org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke Failed
authenticate() test
I'm happy with the part where "myusern...@mycompany.com" is returned
back from the AD, s
08-Feb-2019 11:26:27.415 FINE [https-jsse-nio-443-exec-5]
org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke Failed
authenticate() test
I'm happy with the part where "myusern...@mycompany.com" is returned
back from the AD, so I think most of the stuff is configured correctly
so far. However I have n
2018-06-27 23:34 GMT+03:00 kevin ferguson :
> Hi Guys
>
> Please delete if received I send about 6 emails all bounced not sure why.
> The only think I can think is, the mailing list does not like photo
> atttachements.
There rules are specified here:
Hi Guys
Please delete if received I send about 6 emails all bounced not sure why.
The only think I can think is, the mailing list does not like photo
atttachements.
Kevin
iphers for SSL Labs server test
We're doing good with this:
On 5/10/18 2:45 PM, Baron Fujimoto wrote:
I'm trying to improve our grade on SSL Labs SSL server test[1] for
our
Tomcat configuraton. Currently, their report caps our grade at B
because,
"This server does not support Au
gt;> From: David Wall <d.w...@computer.org>
>>> Date: 5/10/18 6:15 PM (GMT-06:00)
>>> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: configuring ciphers for SSL Labs server test
>>>
>>> We're doing good with this:
&
e
>> On 5/10/18 2:45 PM, Baron Fujimoto wrote:
>>> I'm trying to improve our grade on SSL Labs SSL server test[1] for
>>> our Tomcat configuraton. Currently, their report caps our grade at B
>>> because, "This server does not support Authenticated encryption
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: configuring ciphers for SSL Labs server test
>>
>> We're doing good with this:
>>
>> > protocols="TLSv1.1, TLSv1.2" honorCipherOrder="true"
>> ciphers="TLS_ECDHE
t;
> Original message
>From: David Wall <d.w...@computer.org>
>Date: 5/10/18 6:15 PM (GMT-06:00)
>To: users@tomcat.apache.org
>Subject: Re: configuring ciphers for SSL Labs server test
>
>We're doing good with this:
>
> protoco
Are you using a load balancer?
Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
Original message
From: David Wall <d.w...@computer.org>
Date: 5/10/18 6:15 PM (GMT-06:00)
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: configuring ciphers for SSL Labs server test
We're doin
/18 2:45 PM, Baron Fujimoto wrote:
I'm trying to improve our grade on SSL Labs SSL server test[1] for our
Tomcat configuraton. Currently, their report caps our grade at B because,
"This server does not support Authenticated encryption (AEAD) cipher
suites". They report that we supp
I'm trying to improve our grade on SSL Labs SSL server test[1] for our
Tomcat configuraton. Currently, their report caps our grade at B because,
"This server does not support Authenticated encryption (AEAD) cipher
suites". They report that we support the following cipher suites:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Keiichi,
On 11/1/17 3:28 AM, Keiichi Fujino wrote:
> Hi Dave.
>
> Your Interceptor settings are as follows.
>
>
>> > className="org.apache.catalina.tribes.group.
>> interceptors.TcpFailureDetector"> >
Hi Dave.
Your Interceptor settings are as follows.
>
>
>
>
>uniqueId="{0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15}">
>className="org.apache.catalina.tribes.membership.StaticMember"
> domain="clustertest"
On Mon, 2017-10-30 at 09:15 -0400, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Dave,
>
> Can you please post your and associated elements from
> conf/server.xml -- minus any secrets that may have crept in there?
> Also, what does your network look like? Any intermediates such as
> load
> balancers/firewalls?
aren't too dumb.
>
> I've recently started a new job and have inherited a half-finished
> tomcat cluster on solaris.
>
> While I'm not going to immediately try and finish that cluster, I
> would like to try setting up some test instances to ensure I know
> what to expect
not going to immediately try and finish that cluster, I would
like to try setting up some test instances to ensure I know what to
expect - but I'm having trouble doing even this.
I've gotten my head round how to set up individual instances of Tomcat
8.5.23 running from different sub folders
On 03/08/17 12:09, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Hello,
> My WebEx meeting is in progress.
Sorry folks. PLease ignore this.
Mark
>
>
>
> *Test v2*
> Thursday, 3 August 2017
> 12:09 | GMT Summer Time (London, GMT+01:00) | 1 hr
>
> Meeting number: 314 070 218
Hello,
My WebEx meeting is in progress.
Test v2
Thursday, 3 August 2017
12:09 | GMT Summer Time (London, GMT+01:00) | 1 hr
Meeting number: 314 070 218
Join Meeting
https://pivotal.webex.com/pivotal/e.php?MTID=mf67360b0c9cb219d96a2000a2fcfd729
Can't join the meeting?
https
gt;>> I am building tomcat 7.0.77 with java7 on HP-UX(OS) itanium(IA64)
>> processor.
>>> After building it successful I am running *ant test*.
>>> Multiple tests are failing due to below exception.
>>>
>>> *Exception in thread "Thread-18
0.77 with java7 on HP-UX(OS) itanium(IA64)
> processor.
> > After building it successful I am running *ant test*.
> > Multiple tests are failing due to below exception.
> >
> > *Exception in thread "Thread-18" java.lang.AssertionError: Option not
> found*
>
On 29/04/17 03:47, Arjit Gupta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am building tomcat 7.0.77 with java7 on HP-UX(OS) itanium(IA64) processor.
> After building it successful I am running *ant test*.
> Multiple tests are failing due to below exception.
>
> *Exception in thread "Thread-18
Hi,
I am building tomcat 7.0.77 with java7 on HP-UX(OS) itanium(IA64) processor.
After building it successful I am running *ant test*.
Multiple tests are failing due to below exception.
*Exception in thread "Thread-18" java.lang.AssertionError: Option not found*
Fail test cases are:-
tomcat) <a...@ice-sa.com>
wrote:
On 28.11.2016 14:10, Szymon Czaja wrote:
I will run a test in the meantime to check but this is very much
unlikely,
I can see on the Amazon console that the load balancer CPU is hardly
doing
anything with peaks at 2%. Let's assume load balancer is not an is
; wrote:
>
>> On 28.11.2016 14:10, Szymon Czaja wrote:
>>
>>> I will run a test in the meantime to check but this is very much
>>> unlikely,
>>> I can see on the Amazon console that the load balancer CPU is hardly
>>> doing
>>> any
Completely agree. I am in the process of setting up a direct connection to
Tomcat bypassing load balancer. Will give an update soon.
Szymon
On 28 November 2016 at 13:40, André Warnier (tomcat) <a...@ice-sa.com> wrote:
> On 28.11.2016 14:10, Szymon Czaja wrote:
>
>>
On 28.11.2016 14:10, Szymon Czaja wrote:
I will run a test in the meantime to check but this is very much unlikely,
I can see on the Amazon console that the load balancer CPU is hardly doing
anything with peaks at 2%. Let's assume load balancer is not an issue.
I am not saying that the proxy
I will run a test in the meantime to check but this is very much unlikely,
I can see on the Amazon console that the load balancer CPU is hardly doing
anything with peaks at 2%. Let's assume load balancer is not an issue.
Szymon
On 28 November 2016 at 12:29, André Warnier (tomcat) <a...@
Szymon
On 28 November 2016 at 10:05, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
On 28/11/2016 09:53, Szymon Czaja wrote:
Hi,
I have asked the question on StackOverflow but I am not getting much
response:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/40793335/why-tomcat-
does-not-pass-a-tsung-perfor
wrote:
> On 28/11/2016 09:53, Szymon Czaja wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I have asked the question on StackOverflow but I am not getting much
> > response:
> >
> > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/40793335/why-tomcat-
> > does-not-pass-a-tsung-performance-test-at-40-req
On 28/11/2016 09:53, Szymon Czaja wrote:
> Hi,
> I have asked the question on StackOverflow but I am not getting much
> response:
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/40793335/why-tomcat-
> does-not-pass-a-tsung-performance-test-at-40-requests-per-second
>
> Could anyon
Hi,
I have asked the question on StackOverflow but I am not getting much
response:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/40793335/why-tomcat-
does-not-pass-a-tsung-performance-test-at-40-requests-per-second
Could anyone help me understand why is Tomcat unable to keep up with the
processing when
t; observation. But this has
absolutely nothing to do with Tomcat -- it's all within the JVM so you
shouldn't have noticed a change with a Tomcat upgrade.
> Turning on the StuckThreadDetectionValve with 1 second threshold as
> shown below revealed that there are warning logs with threads stuck
> s
have noticed a change with a Tomcat upgrade.
>
> ==> We have configured the secure random source as below to avoid the
entropy issue -
securerandom.source=file:/dev/./urandom
> Turning on the StuckThreadDetectionValve with 1 second threshold as
> > shown below rev
verifications. Turning on the
StuckThreadDetectionValve with 1 second threshold as shown below revealed
that there are warning logs with threads stuck showing up in the next run
of the test. This clearly shows that the slowness is due to the threads
getting into the blocked state. More
Looks like attachments are not allowed so only sharing the contents of
threadDump3.out
2015-11-04 22:55:58
Full thread dump Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (24.79-b02 mixed mode):
"http-nio-8443-exec-147" daemon prio=10 tid=0x7f5c1c005000 nid=0x6241
runnable [0x7f5bd30ef000]
ple ranka wrote:
> > Also forgot to mention that setting maxKeepAliveRequests to -1 did not
> > help. As expected from the connector documentation the default value for
> > this attribute is 100 and we have a 60 user test set up.
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:18 AM,
Dimple,
On 11/3/15 11:24 PM, dimple ranka wrote:
> Also forgot to mention that setting maxKeepAliveRequests to -1 did not
> help. As expected from the connector documentation the default value for
> this attribute is 100 and we have a 60 user test set up.
>
> On Wed, Nov 4,
18 runs/sec*
> *RUN3 ==> ** 19043.7908496732** runs/sec*
> * RUN4 ==> ** 19001.71568627451 runs/sec*
> ##
Every performance test I have ever done with Tomcat, the first run has
had poorer performance while the system warms up (thread
Hi Mark,
The test client is running on another machine.
The server side test code is written using jersey 1.17.
Will try out with playing with maxKeepAliveRequests.
My only concern is that if jmeter is doing spoofy things then why it doesnt
show up on tomcat6.
Thanks,
Dimple
On Tue, Nov 3
deploy the web application in a tomcat7 container
the slowness with subsequent runs shows up.
Thanks,
Dimple
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 2:36 PM, dimple ranka <dimplekra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> The test client is running on another machine.
>
> The server side test
Also forgot to mention that setting maxKeepAliveRequests to -1 did not
help. As expected from the connector documentation the default value for
this attribute is 100 and we have a 60 user test set up.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:18 AM, dimple ranka <dimplekra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
Hi all,
I am doing some performance data collection on tomcat7 on a 8 processor
high end machine with CentOS release 6.7 (Final) operating system and i am
observing slowness with subsequent runs of the same jmeter test. Here are
the version and specfication details followed by the endpoint source
.
Good news (sort of). I have an *extremely* dirty hack that fixes this on
my test instance by moving some of the data about in the token that the
client sends. It works with 8u20 and 8u45.
At the moment the hack is extremely fragile. I need to make it more
robust and make it optional. I should
On 29/03/2015 23:13, André Warnier wrote:
David Marsh wrote:
I've tested all the following public JDKs
jdk-7u45-windows-i586.exe
jdk-7u65-windows-i586.exe
jdk-7u75-windows-i586.exe
jdk-8-windows-i586.exe
jdk-8u5-windows-i586.exe
jdk-8u11-windows-i586.exe
jdk-8u20-windows-i586.exe
an *extremely* dirty hack that fixes this on
my test instance by moving some of the data about in the token that the
client sends. It works with 8u20 and 8u45.
At the moment the hack is extremely fragile. I need to make it more
robust and make it optional. I should be able to get that done tomorrow
and have
Hi Tomcat Community,
I have downloaded latest certificates from
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/test/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/
And now test are passing.
Thanks Tomcat community :)
Arjit Kumar
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Arjit Gupta arjitk.gu...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Arjit,
On 5/7/15 12:09 AM, Arjit Gupta wrote:
Thanks Tomcat Community for the quick reply.
As answer provided by Mark the test certificate used by unit tests
have been expired, So please provide me any link where I could
download
Hello Tomcat Community,
I am building tomcat 7.0.59 with java7 on HP-UX(OS) itanium(IA64) processor.
After building it successful I am running *ant test*. Which is failing due
to exception which is as below:
Testcase: testSimpleSsl took 4.085 sec
Caused an ERROR
On 06/05/2015 10:43, Arjit Gupta wrote:
Hello Tomcat Community,
I am building tomcat 7.0.59 with java7 on HP-UX(OS) itanium(IA64) processor.
After building it successful I am running *ant test*. Which is failing due
to exception which is as below:
Testcase: testSimpleSsl took 4.085 sec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 5/6/15 8:03 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 06/05/2015 10:43, Arjit Gupta wrote:
Hello Tomcat Community,
I am building tomcat 7.0.59 with java7 on HP-UX(OS) itanium(IA64)
processor. After building it successful I am running *ant test
on HP-UX(OS)
itanium(IA64) processor. After building it successful I am
running *ant test*. Which is failing due to exception which
is as below:
Testcase: testSimpleSsl took 4.085 sec Caused an ERROR
sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: PKIX path
validation failed
On 06/05/2015 13:52, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Mark,
On 5/6/15 8:03 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 06/05/2015 10:43, Arjit Gupta wrote:
Hello Tomcat Community,
I am building tomcat 7.0.59 with java7 on HP-UX(OS) itanium(IA64)
processor. After building it successful I am running *ant test
2015-05-06 15:52 GMT+03:00 Christopher Schultz
Mark,
On 5/6/15 8:03 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 06/05/2015 10:43, Arjit Gupta wrote:
Hello Tomcat Community,
I am building tomcat 7.0.59 with java7 on HP-UX(OS) itanium(IA64)
processor. After building it successful I am running *ant test
7.0.59 with java7 on HP-UX(OS)
itanium(IA64) processor. After building it successful I am
running *ant test*. Which is failing due to exception which
is as below:
Testcase: testSimpleSsl took 4.085 sec Caused an ERROR
sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: PKIX path
validation failed
Thanks Tomcat Community for the quick reply.
As answer provided by Mark the test certificate used by unit tests have
been expired, So please provide me any link where I could download the
certificates in order to test these unit tests successful.
Thanks in Advance.
Arjit Kumar
On Wed, May 6
server to JDK 7 u45.
It appears there are breaking changes to JAAS/GSS in newer JDKs ?
Thank you for doing all this testing. That is useful information to
know. The next step (for you, me or anyone who has the time and wants
to
help) is to test subsequent Java 7 releases and see at which version
.exe -- Only this one fails SPNEGO / Bad GSS Token
Seems a recent fix must broken it.
David
Subject: Re: SPNEGO test configuration with Manager webapp
From: felix.schumac...@internetallee.de
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 10:13:29 +0200
To: users
Subject: Re: SPNEGO test configuration with Manager webapp
From: felix.schumac...@internetallee.de
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 10:13:29 +0200
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Am 28. März 2015 17:46:50 MEZ, schrieb Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:
On 28/03/2015 14:43, David Marsh wrote:
Ok so I went
]
org.apache.catalina.authenticator.SpnegoAuthentic
ator.authenticate No authorization header sent by client
25-Mar-2015 15:46:28.305 FINE [http-nio-80-exec-1]
org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBa
se.invoke Failed authenticate() test
25-Mar-2015 15:46:28.417 FINE [http-nio-80-exec-2
[http-nio-80-exec-1]
org.apache.catalina.authenticator.SpnegoAuthentic
ator.authenticate No authorization header sent by client
28-Mar-2015 14:21:23.949 FINE [http-nio-80-exec-1]
org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBa
se.invoke Failed authenticate() test
28-Mar-2015 14:21:24.433 FINE
From: dmars...@outlook.com
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: RE: SPNEGO test configuration with Manager webapp
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 23:40:06 +
By the way Tomcat 8 was running on JDK :-
C:\Windows\system32java -version
java version 1.8.0_40
Java(TM) SE Runtime
/GSS in newer JDKs ?
Thank you for doing all this testing. That is useful information to
know. The next step (for you, me or anyone who has the time and wants to
help) is to test subsequent Java 7 releases and see at which version it
stops working. I'd hope that a review of the relevant change log
.
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 12:11:34 +0100
From: a...@ice-sa.com
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: SPNEGO test configuration with Manager webapp
David Marsh wrote:
Hi Mark,
Thanks for that, yes I've got 30 years windows experience, I can use Linux
David Marsh wrote:
Hi Mark,
Thanks that would be great !
Do you have a good mechanism to test and ensure kerberos token is passed to
tomcat and not NTLM token ?
I believe that I can answer that.
And the basic answer is no.
First the basic principle, valid for this and many many other areas
/spnego/discussion/1003769/thread/990913cc/?page=1
Does Tomcat 8 work with NegoEx ?
Is Windows 8.1 and Windows Server 2012 RC2 supported ?
My test environment is Windows 2008 R2 server and Windows 7. It is
certainly possibly security has been tightened between those versions
and 2012/R2 + 8
Hi Mark,
Thanks that would be great !
Do you have a good mechanism to test and ensure kerberos token is passed to
tomcat and not NTLM token ?
David
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 09:00:22 +
From: ma...@apache.org
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: SPNEGO test configuration with Manager
and used JAAS/GSS-API in Java thick
clients.
I made the IE settings you outlined but it seems to still prompt.
IE has win-tc01.kerbtest.local as a trusted site.
Enable Windows Integrated Authentication is on
Auto logon only in Intranet Zone is on
I've been using Firefox to test and that does send
in the past with success and used JAAS/GSS-API in Java thick
clients.
I made the IE settings you outlined but it seems to still prompt.
IE has win-tc01.kerbtest.local as a trusted site.
Enable Windows Integrated Authentication is on
Auto logon only in Intranet Zone is on
I've been using Firefox to test
David Marsh wrote:
Put keytab in c:\keytab\tomcat.keytab, ensured owner was tc01@KERTEST.LOCAL,
still same symptoms.
Ran klist on client after firefox test and the three 401 responses. :-
C:\Users\test.KERBTEST.000klist
Current LogonId is 0:0x2fd7a
Cached Tickets: (2)
#0 Client
Put keytab in c:\keytab\tomcat.keytab, ensured owner was tc01@KERTEST.LOCAL,
still same symptoms.
Ran klist on client after firefox test and the three 401 responses. :-
C:\Users\test.KERBTEST.000klist
Current LogonId is 0:0x2fd7a
Cached Tickets: (2)
#0 Client: test @ KERBTEST.LOCAL
Am 25.03.2015 16:09, schrieb David Marsh:
Put keytab in c:\keytab\tomcat.keytab, ensured owner was
tc01@KERTEST.LOCAL, still same symptoms.
Ran klist on client after firefox test and the three 401 responses. :-
C:\Users\test.KERBTEST.000klist
Current LogonId is 0:0x2fd7a
Cached Tickets: (2
Its possible I guess, although I would not expect that.
The test is :-
Client Test Windows 8.1 VM with Firefox - Tomcat Server Windows 8.1 VM
Firefox is not configured to use a proxy, its all in Vmware Workstation 10
using the Vmnet01 virtual network.
Firefox has three 401 responses
]
org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBa
se.invoke Failed authenticate() test
25-Mar-2015 15:46:28.417 FINE [http-nio-80-exec-2]
org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBa
se.invoke Security checking request GET /manager/html
25-Mar-2015 15:46:28.420 FINE [http-nio-80-exec-2
]
org.apache.catalina.authenticator.SpnegoAuthentic
ator.authenticate No authorization header sent by client
25-Mar-2015 15:46:28.305 FINE [http-nio-80-exec-1]
org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBa
se.invoke Failed authenticate() test
25-Mar-2015 15:46:28.417 FINE [http-nio-80-exec-2
1 - 100 of 329 matches
Mail list logo
