Again, why do you try to generate a json object in the browser??
Why not create a normal wicket form that you post to the server and
then in the form submit method you create the json object
On 11/24/07, Pen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know how to get the postdata from the request object
Can we then make something where we ask some setting first for the
host part? If not found we generate from the current request, which i
think for many many production environments will not really work
because who doesnt virtualhost or puts apache in front of it?
On 11/25/07, Al Maw [EMAIL
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1185
Johan Compagner wrote:
please make a jira issue for this
On Nov 22, 2007 9:49 PM, Johannes Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have the same problem with 1.3.0-rc1...
I have tried to create a minimal example, but did not work...
The
If you virtual host in apache on a server (local ip 10.0.0.1)
so
www.mydomain.com/
is virtual hosted by a tomcat server on a local network (10.0.0.2)
10.0.0.2:8080/myapp1context
and you do a request to apach
it will rewrite the url and give it to tomcat
Then the request url is really
On 25 Nov 2007, at 13:01, Johan Compagner wrote:
If you virtual host in apache on a server (local ip 10.0.0.1)
it will rewrite the url and give it to tomcat
Then the request url is really
http://10.0.0.2:8080/myapp1context/XX
I use Apache as a proxy and have got past this issue by using
something like this would be nice in wicketstuff-minis ...
-igor
On Nov 25, 2007 5:15 AM, Uwe Schäfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi
with significant help of the IRC, i did a Lightbox2-Panel-Component,
that can be found here:
http://www.codesmell.org/org.codesmell.wicket.lightbox
thanks to
also the port?
On Nov 25, 2007 8:47 PM, John Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 25 Nov 2007, at 13:01, Johan Compagner wrote:
If you virtual host in apache on a server (local ip 10.0.0.1)
it will rewrite the url and give it to tomcat
Then the request url is really
Igor Vaynberg schrieb:
something like this would be nice in wicketstuff-minis ...
i´d be glad to contribute it into wicketstuff-minis, as soon as it is
mature enough. currently it lacks some features i´d like to add. expect
this to be done in a few weeks. promise.
cu uwe
On 25 Nov 2007, at 15:26, Johan Compagner wrote:
also the port?
Yes the port is also contained in the host header so it works fine -
as if the proxy was not there at all. I know that Jetty always
respects the host header.
Ryan Sonnek wrote:
I'm trying to accomplish the same thing and think that wicket should
provide such an API. all of the issues mentioned are well known
issues and other web frameworks still provide an API and just
acknowledge the limitations.
This is pretty important for me as I can't
Personally I'd rather put it in a config file and know it's right rather
than have it break if someone decides to virtual host/firewall/proxy the
webapp and forgets to tweak the settings just right, (e.g., forgets the
ProxyPreserveHost directive).
That's why you have automated tests to make
Thank you for your answers. As you can see, I have already done the release.
Let's hope this is useful for someone :-)
Regards,
Daniel.
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
But the question here is... what is the real use of the ICryptFactory today
(1.3.0-rc1) in wicket? Is it only encrypting URLs? (I
i noticed daniel carleton was working on wicket gwt integration, but the wiki
page makes it look incomplete. has anyone gone any further on this?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/wicket-%2B-gwt-tf4872556.html#a13942831
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at
Dear all,
I've made a Page with the usual Form component. The use case is users
are able to enter data from this form more than once when they are
still on that page. But the problem is the state of the object from
that form is kept, so it looks like that user enters the same data.
So I tried
If you use a stateless form then the complete page is recreated when
the user does a submit, the plus is then that you never have an
expired page and for you that you start fresh. But that starting fresh
is only because you page is fully stateless, if you had some other
none stateless thing on it
15 matches
Mail list logo
