Sure, wicket-tree is still in its conception phase.
I'll tidy up the project structure soon.
Sven
On Sa, 2009-07-25 at 18:57 -0400, James Carman wrote:
So is the project a war (since it runs with jetty:run)? Wouldn't that make
it hard to use in other projects?
On Jul 25, 2009 6:18 PM,
Nested tree and tree table seems promicing.
What I missed in your example is single-selection mode, and sortable headers
with filters.
One of my the upcoming tasks is to build a selector component that knows
whether the object is hierarchical and puts inside a datatable with
navigator or
Why you don't extend ITreeProvider from IDataProvider? They looks compatible
for now. I can add IDataProvider to my implementation class and delegate
roots() to iterator(). From the other hand it is just extra method.
One thing to mention. There should be full row select option. You just
need to
I find the source code pretty clean and easy to understand. Especially if you
are familiar with DataTable component. For instance I see that it is easy to
use Ajax versions of Toolbars instead of static (however
DefaultAjaxFallbackTreeTable would be usefull)
Looking forward for the
For me the magic is how wicket is managing pages and their versions. For
instance I realized that it increments version when preparing the page for
render. But when I was debugging the code related to version manager I felt
lost :)
All the other stuff is pretty complex but not difficult to
Coding style is not the best in all parts, fro reading point of view,
definitely ...
**
Martin
2009/7/26 Vladimir K koval...@gmail.com:
For me the magic is how wicket is managing pages and their versions. For
instance I realized that it increments version when preparing the page for
render.
Hi,
I've added single selection to the example. I'm not sure how sorting and
filtering applies to hierarchical data though.
API will be finalized after sufficient feedback from the Wicket
community - so keep on firing questions ;).
Sven
On So, 2009-07-26 at 01:51 -0700, Vladimir K wrote:
Just make IDataProvider in charge for sorting and filtering like DataTable
does.
Filtering in tree could be seen in Eclipse preferences for instance.
svenmeier wrote:
Hi,
I've added single selection to the example. I'm not sure how sorting and
filtering applies to hierarchical data
Hi,
ITreeProvider and IDataProvider are not exactly compatible, I don't
think we gain anything by extending the former from the latter.
Selection is not part of the tree components. There are just to many
different notions of selection:
- single/multiple selection
- subtree selection
-
Yep, intercept the ajax call and inc/dec a counter
-- paolo
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 10:03 AM, John Patterson jdpatter...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi, I notice that when I have two ajax requests overlapping the indicator
is turned off when the first one completes.
Start AJAX request A - turns on the
svenmeier wrote:
ITreeProvider and IDataProvider are not exactly compatible, I don't
think we gain anything by extending the former from the latter.
I don't insist. But you do have IDataProvider wrapper over ITreeProvider in
TableTree.java :)
Selection is not part of the tree
Does TableTree support partial (ajax) updates?
-Matej
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Vladimir Kkoval...@gmail.com wrote:
svenmeier wrote:
ITreeProvider and IDataProvider are not exactly compatible, I don't
think we gain anything by extending the former from the latter.
I don't insist.
It does not. It is stated at the bottom of the home page
http://code.google.com/p/wicket-tree/
For ajax updates it should behave not worse than DataTable component.
Matej, I find the idea of re-using data provider, columns and cells
developed for DataTable very important.
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
Reading Wicket in Action to learn Wicket, I understand that sessions are
not thread-safe. I have the following questions about a Wicket app:
1. If I open another tab on the same browser (IE or FF), visitor activities on
the same Wicket app are considered in the same session?
2. If I start
Hi!
AjaxSubmitLink does not work in 1.4-rc7
Anybody know a workaround: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2400
?
**
Martin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands,
Another question:
By default, Wicket's SessionStore stores older pages to a temporary directory.
It is stored as files, correct? In case of a large website demanding high
performance, it should be stored in a high-performance database, correct?
Thanks!
--- On Sun, 7/26/09, David Chang
ITreeProvider and IDataProvider are not exactly compatible, I don't
think we gain anything by extending the former from the latter.
I don't insist. But you do have IDataProvider wrapper over ITreeProvider in
TableTree.java :)
Yes, indeed ;).
I din't find API to control expanded state of
Hi Developers,
Slowly but surely I move through the tests of the wicket security
framework.
In one test, the SecureFormTest, i ran into some strange behaviour.
It starts with an exception like this:
org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.request.InvalidUrlException:
David,
Please note Sessions are not thread-safe in Wicket context means that
the Session /object/ is not thread-safe. Note that requests that fall
within a session (except for resources) are handled serially. Only when
you use session clustering this guarantee can not be made.
1. It depends
the link works just fine, wicket tester doesnt work right.
-igor
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Martin
Makundimartin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
Hi!
AjaxSubmitLink does not work in 1.4-rc7
Anybody know a workaround: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2400
?
**
Martin
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 8:53 AM, David Changdavid_q_zh...@yahoo.com wrote:
1. If I open another tab on the same browser (IE or FF), visitor activities
on the same Wicket app are considered in the same session?
same session, this is why we provide browser auto-multiwindow support,
so we can
the link works just fine, wicket tester doesnt work right.
Sorry for the inconcise title, yes, the link works, the test doesn't.
I am doing test-first approach so I sometimes exaggerate, but yes, the
test does not work.
**
Martin
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Martin
if the form is disabled why is it allowed to be submitted?
-igor
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Olger Warnierol...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Hi Developers,
Slowly but surely I move through the tests of the wicket security framework.
In one test, the SecureFormTest, i ran into some strange
you can always submit a patch you know.
-Matej
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Martin
Makundimartin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
the link works just fine, wicket tester doesnt work right.
Sorry for the inconcise title, yes, the link works, the test doesn't.
I am doing test-first
you can always submit a patch you know.
I haven't a clue how to fix it, unfortunately. This is the part I am
most unfamiliar with in Wicket. I don't even know how it is supposed
to work (=on code level).
-Matej
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Martin
Hi Igor,
if the form is disabled why is it allowed to be submitted?
In a test you can ;)
When you know what to submit, it is possible to submit those values
without a page, although I can imagine that it is quite hard to
achieve due to the way wicket handles form variables and stuff (via
Hi Igor,
I used Firebug to have a look at the onClick event.
I've inspected two links, one usual ajax link and one for the ssl login.
Regarding the first link:
href=?wicket:interface=:6:content:container:areaTop:2:panelTop:container:loginForm:linkForgotLogin:container:link::ILinkListener::
then we are getting in a debate of what use an invalidurlexception
really is. if we forward page expired and a bunch of other exceptions,
why do we even need an invalidurlexception...
the point is the user has submitted a form that they should not have
been able to, it is an invalid url...
i
Erik, thanks for your input.
Please note Sessions are not thread-safe in Wicket
context means that the Session /object/ is not thread-safe.
Note that requests that fall within a session (except for
resources) are handled serially. Only when you use session
clustering this guarantee can
btw: the xml code I saw showed me, that the login was successfully executed
because login content was presented in the xml code.
Von: Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Gesendet: Freitag, den 24. Juli 2009, 21:51:48 Uhr
Betreff:
the href is not a problem; you seeing # appended to the end of the url
is the correct behavior. what should have happened was the ajax call
to that https url in the background.
so what you should be looking into is why the ajax call with that
https url was never made or response from it not
no, incorrect. multiple browser tabs can be used to access the same
session instance simultaneously.
-igor
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 1:17 PM, David Changdavid_q_zh...@yahoo.com wrote:
Erik, thanks for your input.
Please note Sessions are not thread-safe in Wicket
context means that the
I just want to remind the reason why the InvalidUrlException was introduced:
to avoid situations when user would tweak somehow the url and get the
InternalError Page... I introduced a request for enhancement for
InvalidUrlException feature and if there are any problems related to it, you
can
Igor, thank you for the correction. Really appreciated. Thanks!
--- On Sun, 7/26/09, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Questions about Wicket sessions
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Date: Sunday, July 26, 2009, 4:23 PM
no,
my point is that this case is on the fence.
it is an invalid url, and it is a security violation. so which one
should take precendence?
my other concern is that we would have to maintain a long list of
exceptions that should be passed through, which becomes a pita.
-igor
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009
If you think this would help, then you could remove InvalidUrlException and
invalidate the jira RFE created by me... I don't think this would heart
anyone...
Alex
igor.vaynberg wrote:
my point is that this case is on the fence.
it is an invalid url, and it is a security violation. so
In addition I need something like AjaxFallbackImageSubmitButton. Just to let
you know that he is not alone :)
From my perspective Wicket should provide basic Button and mixins (mostly
behaviours) to add Ajax, AjaxFallback, Image, Submit etc. So users could
just get the button they need by adding
Sven,
i added TableTree (why not TreeTable?) to my panel and added a button to
switch between tree and table representation.
The problem is that DataTable relies on the user that binds it to the
table tag at the time when your TableTree contains table within.
It is not a big deal just an
Since you update AbstractTree in ajax request I can't omit etra 'div' tag
that encloses table tag neither by using wicket:component nor by calling
setRenderBodyOnly(true).
Vladimir K wrote:
Sven,
i added TableTree (why not TreeTable?) to my panel and added a button to
switch between tree
Hi,
*Nested*Tree... *Table*Tree... I hope this makes sense ;).
I will align the markup for TableTree with the markup of DataTable,
thanks for the hint.
Sven
On So, 2009-07-26 at 16:29 -0700, Vladimir K wrote:
Sven,
i added TableTree (why not TreeTable?) to my panel and added a button to
40 matches
Mail list logo
