ok, so its the parent.isEnabledInHierarchy that's forcing the
RequestListenerInterface - component not enabled or visible; ignoring
call.
Any chance I could override that somehow, or should I/we refactor our design
to not have view/edit forms (groan)
--
View this message in context:
http://apac
Got an odd issue since upgrading to 1.5.1.
An image in a form is somehow unable to determine it's resource when the
form is disabled (eg read-only "view" of a detail form). When the form is
"enabled" (ie into edit mode), the image becomes visible just fine.
Something to do with the anticache value
Hi Sven
Thanks a lot for your help. That worked !!
Regards
- Original Message -
From: Sven Meier
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Monday, October 3, 2011 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: Wicket Wizard -- how to force a wizardstep to redraw or refresh
Hi,
you could move you
To be fair, there is code in the web site he pointed at. Look under
"Beispielcode" link. I don't speak a lick of german, but it is not
hard to figure out that is the code, and under the web apps directory
there is some code that can be useful
wicket-praxis-code\de.wicketpraxis--webapp\src\main\jav
Hi Kai Mütz,
Why don't you show some code? Don't you think this is better than
advertising a book?
The site your link point to does not show any code but only talk about the
book.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-Dynamic-Navigation-tp2228587p38
Hi Jeffrey,
Whether or not events are helpful for your application really depends on
your application. If you have components that know about each others'
existence for the sole purpose of notifications, abstracting those exchanges
into events is a clean way to decoupled those components.
The def
I am currently converting an app to version 1.5.1 and am starting to
look into/work with the event model. What is the suggested approach for
using the event model? Should all Ajax be moved to the event model
(anywhere where in 1.4 the code had target.addComponent or
target.addJavascript calls)?
SOLVED:
I had to remove the following method in my Error404Page class:
@Override
protected void configureResponse(WebResponse response) {
super.configureResponse(response);
((HttpServletResponse)response.getContainerResponse())
.setStatus(HttpServletResponse.SC_NOT_FOUND);
}
After removing th
Ah, just read that you solved it:
Have fun
Sven
On 10/03/2011 09:22 PM, Sven Meier wrote:
> You're probably missing a close tag somewhere here: [bunch of html]
>
> What's at line 196, column 27 ?
>
> Sven
>
>
> On 10/03/2011 09:17 PM, Jeffrey Schneller wrote:
>> Been migrating an app to 1.5.
You're probably missing a close tag somewhere here: [bunch of html]
What's at line 196, column 27 ?
Sven
On 10/03/2011 09:17 PM, Jeffrey Schneller wrote:
> Been migrating an app to 1.5.1 and wanted to test a simple first page.
> I continue to run into problems rendering the page. I continue to
I solved my problem. I had a double quote in the title tag. Removing
that resolved the problem.
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Schneller [mailto:jeffrey.schnel...@envisa.com]
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 3:18 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Migration to 1.5.1 -- unable to re
Hi,
you could move you fragment setup into onBeforeRender():
if (abModel.getObject().getQryType() == 1 &&
!(EasyQueryFragment.class.isInstance(get("querySpan"))) {
addOrReplace(new EasyQueryFragment("querySpan",
"easyQueryFragment", abModel));
} else ...
Sven
On 10/03/2011 06:54 PM, ba
Been migrating an app to 1.5.1 and wanted to test a simple first page.
I continue to run into problems rendering the page. I continue to get
the following exception:
Caused by: java.text.ParseException: No matching close bracket at (line
196, column 27)
at
org.apache.wicket.ma
Hi-
Just upgraded to 1.5.1 from 1.4.18 and was not seeing this behavior
described below.
In our application, the Wicket filter and error page is setup in the web.xml
like so:
wicket.filter
/app/*
REQUEST
ERROR
404
/app/404
In my WicketApplication class I am mounting the 404 [ *mountPage("
in a non wicket request ,you will have a non wicket session ..
is your this question related to previous question?
for a wicketsession there is a httpsession ,cant exist without it,when
you will invalidate the session like in previous case
both will get invalidated ..
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 9:1
Hi
I have a wicket wizard with 5 steps and in the confirmation step, I have a
panel which contains 3 Fragments.
This panel will render one of these fragments based on the state of the Model.
The problem is the that this panel is getting cached wen the wizard model is
initialized .
Is it pos
I'm looking at 1.4's WebSession#cleanupFeedbackMessages(), and it looks like
only feedback messages associated with a component are always cleared. So if
you associate the message with the Session itself (Session#info(...)), and
make sure no FeedbackPanels are rendered in the onSubmit() response, t
I confirm the problem. I'm opening an issue on jira.
Hi,
Using ajax to update a component that has an AbstractTransformerBehavior
attached throws a ClassCastException (see below). I can only assume that
this is not intentional?
Root cause:
java.lang.ClassCastException:
org.apache.wicket.ajax.Aj
Ok, that I understand. Do you have an idea how to circumvent this and
get the feedback message into the parent page?
Am 03.10.2011 um 17:51 schrieb Dan Retzlaff:
We use our own modal window class so I'm not sure what the best way
to go
is. But I can probably explain what's happening. The
We use our own modal window class so I'm not sure what the best way to go
is. But I can probably explain what's happening. The onSubmit request
renders the feedback into the modal, then clears the messages from the
session. Then in a separate close button callback request you're
re-rendering the pa
In our apps we use a request-scoped guice provider.
This makes the scoping explicit, and as an added benefit you get looser
coupling:
@Inject
Provider userProvider;
When no user is logged in, we return a Null object (which also works
since we use domain driven design extensively).
E.g. User
Vineet,
Thanks for the help.
I also need to handle non Wicket Request. Is the session is Wicket Session
or HttpSession?
Thanks
Don
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/What-is-the-right-way-to-identify-the-second-login-for-the-same-user-tp3867590p3867
In the ModalWindow I have an AjaxButton in whose onSubmit method I
call ModalWindow.closeCurrent(target);
Is that not the right way to go?
2011/9/30 Dan Retzlaff
> Each FeedbackPanel rendered in a response includes all messages generated
> during that request. The messages are then cleared fro
Isn't it a bad idea to keep any non-thread-safe objects in the session?
Sharing entities sounds particularly risky since any persistence session
other than the original that, say, tries to initialize a lazy collection
will result in a runtime exception.
Because of this, our application maintains t
Could you provide some snippet of your code?
Have you setOutputMarkupId on your PageableListView?
*Bruno Borges*
(21) 7672-7099
*www.brunoborges.com*
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Martin A wrote:
> Thanks, but strangely, clicking on a AjaxNavigationLink returns empty
> response. Do you ha
Hi,
Using ajax to update a component that has an AbstractTransformerBehavior
attached throws a ClassCastException (see below). I can only assume that
this is not intentional?
Root cause:
java.lang.ClassCastException:
org.apache.wicket.ajax.AjaxRequestTarget$AjaxResponse cannot be cast
to org.apac
correcting a typo i made
retrieve the previous session by *userid*
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:54 PM, vineet semwal
wrote:
> you can store sessionid corresponding to a particular user ,
> if he tries to login from different browser,you can retrieve the
> previous session by session id
> kill the
I might be wrong, but this does not seem like a Wicket related problem.
Here a spontaneous idea what I would try:
To track sessions of a user I would try to use a database table that
associates sessions with users and a boolean flag "isvalid".
A new session would have to create an entry in that
you can store sessionid corresponding to a particular user ,
if he tries to login from different browser,you can retrieve the
previous session by session id
kill the old session when the user logs in from different browser...
1) sessionid=findsessionbyuserid()
2)application.sessionUnbound(session
Hi everyone,
We use proxy around HttpServletResponse in our application. I would like
to test components/pages using WicketTester, but when WicketTester tries
to startPage it throws following exception:
java.lang.ClassCastException: myPackage.HttpServletResponseProxy cannot
be cast to org.ap
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Marco wrote:
> public String renderTemplate(WebPage webPage) {
> BufferedWebResponse bufferedWebResponse = new
> BufferedWebResponse(null);
> webPage.getRequestCycle().setResponse(bufferedWebResponse);
> webPage.render();
>
> return buf
public String renderTemplate(WebPage webPage) {
BufferedWebResponse bufferedWebResponse = new BufferedWebResponse(null);
webPage.getRequestCycle().setResponse(bufferedWebResponse);
webPage.render();
return bufferedWebResponse.getText().toString();
}
Martin,
Hi Marco,
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Marco wrote:
> You can also use:
>
>
>
You paste didn't make it.
> I prefer this solution. Using a class which is intended for testing
> (WicketTester) to produce results in a production environment is strange.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> h
You can also use:
I prefer this solution. Using a class which is intended for testing
(WicketTester) to produce results in a production environment is strange.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Redering-to-to-file-in-wicket1-5-tp3854891p3867053.html
Se
Hi,
when onEvent is triggered the callback script has been already executed,
so it's too late to re-generate it. Maybe I didn't understand right your
problem.
Hi,
I have an overridden the
AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior.getCallbackScript(boolean onlyTargetActivePage)
method.
I have also overridde
Each browser opens up a new session, that's no actual problem.
Sessions are pretty thread safe (correct me if I'm wrong) when they're
accessed from request threads (normal Wicket application flow).
If Browser #1 changes something to user data or some other db data, and
Browser #2 fires a new r
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Zeldor wrote:
> Marco:
>
> And it works without problems? There is no issue with user trying to log
> from 2 browser on same time, trying to cheat the system? I am just wondering
> if there is any risk of that.
> How does your code look then in session and how do y
I'd say it's mostly a cache.
>From estimates I can say that 80-90% of the time data will be read-only.
Only remaining 10-20% will be data manipulation.
My current implementation is that I use setters on data in Session and then
persist whole User. Like that:
MySession.get().getUser().setFree_la
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 10:31:38 +0200
Martin Grigorov wrote:
> > Yes, just put a field in your Session and add getter/setter.
> This is not good.
> This is error prone. This way you'll have to keep the instance in the
> Session in sync with the data DB. Additionally the memory size will
> increase f
Marco:
And it works without problems? There is no issue with user trying to log
from 2 browser on same time, trying to cheat the system? I am just wondering
if there is any risk of that.
How does your code look then in session and how do you fetch your data?
Martin:
I was trying to save on cos
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Carl-Eric Menzel wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 01:10:58 -0700 (PDT)
> Zeldor wrote:
>
>> But would it be possible to store User data in the session without
>> having to fetch it from datastore on every request? My users don't
>> interact with each other and they ope
I sort of use the same thing, storing the user in the Session.
Only I store a LoadableDetachableModel in the Session, representing the
user.
In my scenario, the LDM is a custom Model and the key identifier is a Long
number, but that shouldn't be a difference.
And the injection happens in the
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 01:10:58 -0700 (PDT)
Zeldor wrote:
> But would it be possible to store User data in the session without
> having to fetch it from datastore on every request? My users don't
> interact with each other and they operate only on their own data. So
> it'd be most efficient to store
So it's normal that I lose User data when I move from login to main page and
I will have to fetch it from db quite often.
When will it happen? I have users browsing around my app, doing most often
nothing. Plenty of labels with gets. Will browsing like that trigger
fetching user data from db? Or w
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Zeldor wrote:
> But would it be possible to store User data in the session without having to
> fetch it from datastore on every request? My users don't interact with each
> other and they operate only on their own data. So it'd be most efficient to
> store User dat
But would it be possible to store User data in the session without having to
fetch it from datastore on every request? My users don't interact with each
other and they operate only on their own data. So it'd be most efficient to
store User data in the session and interact with db only when some dat
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Zeldor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem with designing authentication and session properly. I asked
> for help some time ago, but I was not able to fix the problem.
>
> I have a standard situation - I have an app that has bunch of pages and only
> main page wi
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 00:54:31 -0700 (PDT)
Zeldor wrote:
> 2. How to fetch data from Guice in Session? I have a Repository
> Inject, but when it is used in Session it throws nullpointer
> exception. Should I have it in session at all? I guess repopulating
> user data like that is not the best idea,
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 00:54:31 -0700 (PDT)
Zeldor wrote:
> It all works fine on my computer, but when I deploy it, it stops
> working. Session gets detached on the way and I cannot fetche the
> data to my models. Yes, I keep user data in my session, I could do it
> with datastore queries, but sessio
Hi,
I have a problem with designing authentication and session properly. I asked
for help some time ago, but I was not able to fix the problem.
I have a standard situation - I have an app that has bunch of pages and only
main page with login form should be accessible for everyone. Everything else
50 matches
Mail list logo