It seems that Wicket Resource can't obtain whole HTTP POST body.
The reason of that is the following:
Mappers invoke WebRequest.isAjax() and isAjax() is trying to
getRequestParameters() - so body of POST parsed prior to actual
getInputStream() in a Resource object.
Is there any chances to allow
Great Andrea!
Thanks a lot!
kind regards
Tobias
> Am 25.03.2016 um 16:34 schrieb andrea del bene :
>
> Hi,
>
> I've added a couple of notes to the userguide about markup parsing and
> autocomponents:
>
>
Thankx, very useful,
I like these clear explanations about wicket internals. It is not always
easy to understand them from code.
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 4:34 PM, andrea del bene
Thanks!
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 4:34 PM, andrea del bene
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've added a couple of notes to the userguide about markup parsing and
> autocomponents:
>
>
> https://ci.apache.org/projects/wicket/guide/7.x/guide/single.html#autocomponents
>
> Have fun!
>
>
Hi,
I've added a couple of notes to the userguide about markup parsing and
autocomponents:
https://ci.apache.org/projects/wicket/guide/7.x/guide/single.html#autocomponents
Have fun!
Andrea.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
https://ci.apache.org/projects/wicket/guide/7.x/guide/single.html#advanced_5
On 25/03/2016 12:24, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro wrote:
IMarkupResourceStreamProvider?
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 12:19 PM, andre seame wrote:
Hello,
Question?
I would like to create a
IMarkupResourceStreamProvider?
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 12:19 PM, andre seame wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Question?
> I would like to create a component.java that is associated to a HTML
> markup file component.html, but a part of the markup file must be dynamic.
>
> Why?
> A
Hello,
Question?
I would like to create a component.java that is associated to a HTML markup
file component.html, but a part of the markup file must be dynamic.
Why?
A standard form is associated to a HTML markup file like:
...
...
..
...
But, I would like to group the input fields with
Thanks a lot for clarifications Tobias :)
I hope we will finally move to WebRTC :)
I will ask for help and/or will provide patches :)
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 2:59 AM, Tobias Soloschenko wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> I used SimpleWebRTC (https://simplewebrtc.com) to implement