getting in touch with jetty people and see if
they are willing to add a setting to control this, and please keep us
informed.
-igor
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:59 PM, Joel Halbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone had issues when using wicket with Jetty and persistent
sessions
I've just updated to 1.4rc1, and it works.
On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 20:40 +, Joel Halbert wrote:
Hi,
Just picking up on this thread:
http://www.nabble.com/Google-Chrome---Wicket-td19277005.html
and this chrome bug report:
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1085
Dear firend:Hello.How are you doing recently?Some days ago, I came across a
wonderful electronic company on the web and had a pleasant chat with the sales
manager. He told me that they are planning to lower the prices greatly in order
to adapt to the global economic crisis, so that they
Hi,
Has anyone had issues when using wicket with Jetty and persistent
sessions?
Specifically when the server is restarted sessions are intialised before
servlets are ready, this causes an exception when wicket deserialises
the current page which was in session since the WicketApplication is
not
Hi,
I'd like to be able to write something akin to a request Filter, but for
wicket requests, specifically I'd like it to be Page aware - i.e. it was
aware of the wicket Page class that the request was being forwarded to.
I'd like to do some custom validation in this class and based on the
result
Hi,
In follow up to the following thread:
http://wicket.markmail.org/search/?q=multiple%20radiogroup%20in%20table#query:multiple%20radiogroup%20in%20table+page:1+mid:4mgyvni2ggbffkfq+state:results
Can anyone offer any suggestions as to how one might roll their own
component, as suggested, to
Hi,
A quick mail to many thanks to the Wicket community for all it's support
in helping us to launch a new social news and bookmarking site,
www.roo10.com .
In addition to saying that the framework itself was fun and easy to work
with, a few comments on our experience of using Wicket to
Hi,
Is it threadsafe and wicket safe to share static Components across multiple
instances of a Page (as well as across request threads) in wicket?
Say for example I have a BookmarkablePageLink that takes no dynamic
PageParameter arguments, can I create this as a static class member and share
(BTW I am assuming that since each component has a parent that sharing is
NOT allowed)
--
From: Joel Halbert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 9:29 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Is it safe to share static components across
Hi,
This is probably not a wicket related query as such (so apologies) but just in
case here goes
I have placed our tomcat server behind apache and we are using mod_jk.
When I do this we see the jsessionid being written out in the url for the very
first request response to the user (so we
In our use case all the pages are stateless, but they are by no means
static. We have in fact designed the entire site to use stateless pages,
again for scalability; but every single page is also dynamic. I would like
to produce and share some metrics from the JVM around object allocation and
Hi,
I'm experiencing a problem on a form whereby if I include a FileUploadField
in the form, causing the form encoding type to become multipart/form-data,
none of the model objects from other fields on the form are correctly populated
when the form is submitted. Oddly enough we do have other
?
--
From: Joel Halbert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 1:14 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Forn models not populated when using FileUploadField and
multipart/form-data .. ?
Hi,
I'm experiencing a problem on a form whereby if I include a
FileUploadField in the form, causing
I am an idiot.
I'd forgotten that this was required on multipart forms:
f.setMultiPart(true);
(hanging head in shame)
--
From: Joel Halbert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 2:10 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Forn models
Hi,
I was wondering whether it was possible to implement pooling of stateless
pages? Possibly using a custom PageMap implementation?
Although newer JVM's are good at performing GC, pooling is a reasonable
additional technique to use for achieving that extra bit of scalability.
If anyone has
/memory.
And pooling pages is not really what you want any way, you can only
pool then for a single user/sessiion so you would have a pool for
every session.
And when do you decide to return a pooled page?
On 5/18/08, Joel Halbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering whether
request there's lot going on with the page. So you can't just reuse
the instances.
-Matej
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Joel Halbert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering whether it was possible to implement pooling of
stateless pages? Possibly using a custom PageMap implementation
no gain at all.
Martijn
On 5/18/08, Joel Halbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Johan,
Although the pages are stateless, they can still be pooled, and
re-initialised (their state cleared out) between requests.
This is indeed what many java servlet containers do with stateless
Servlets.
It is also
I take your point, thanks for the pointer.
--
From: Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 1:31 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Processing a form before page components are created
The reason I want to do this
against a model, thus the values need to be supplied upfront, while
the page is being created...
--
From: Joel Halbert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 12:57 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Processing a form before page
;
}
};
}
--
From: Joel Halbert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 4:21 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Processing a form before page components are created
What about the situation where one of the components on the Page
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone had any good suggestions or patterns on how to
process a form without using Form.onSubmit and model objects?
The reason I want to do this is that my pages are stateless, and I want to
process the submitted form before all the components on the page are
, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Joel Halbert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I've noticed that when submitting a (stateless) Form page the onSubmit()
method of the form is only called once all the Page components have all
been created, and likewise any model objects relating to the form are
only populated once
solution just another option you could explore, it has the
added benefit that you do not have to tackle those pageparams
yourself.
just my 2c
Maurice
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Joel Halbert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Igor,
Yes I take your point about being able to replace components within
Hi,
Does anyone know if there is an easy way of appending page parameters to the
action query string of a stateless form without overriding
Page.getPageParameters() ?
The reason I would want to do this is if I had two forms on the page and I
wanted to hold different state in each form.
(I
?
Martijn
On 5/9/08, Joel Halbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know if there is an easy way of appending page parameters to
the action query string of a stateless form without overriding
Page.getPageParameters() ?
The reason I would want to do this is if I had two forms
Hi,
I've noticed that when submitting a (stateless) Form page the onSubmit()
method of the form is only called once all the Page components have all been
created, and likewise any model objects relating to the form are only populated
once the page components have been rendered.
This means
something wrong and was wondering if anyone
could point out what I'm doing wrong.
Many Thanks,
Joel Halbert
]
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 7:13 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Best way to use borders tranparently
Try using markup inheritance. It's way easier than borders.
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Joel Halbert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to work out the best way
(js));
}
}
(of course the tidier version would be just to write out the variables, and
have the js fn static on the page, but same deal)
Thx
Joel
--
From: Joel Halbert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 9:22 AM
To: users
30 matches
Mail list logo