Hi Martin,
If the next release is not too far away, I'd rather wait.
I'm already pushing a milestone to production and don't want to copy large
chunks of code to my project as well ;)
Best regards,
Thomas
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 1:33 PM Martin Grigorov
wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Thu, Apr
Hi Thomas,
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 1:41 PM Thomas Heigl wrote:
> Thanks Sven!
>
> I think the solution is good enough for now.
>
> Would it be possible to do a 9.0.0-M5.1 release for this? If so, I would
> give it another try on production.
>
It would be easier to copy the class temporarily in
Thanks Sven!
I think the solution is good enough for now.
Would it be possible to do a 9.0.0-M5.1 release for this? If so, I would
give it another try on production.
Best regards,
Thomas
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 11:57 PM Sven Meier wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> I've pushed a change for
>
Hi Thomas,
I've pushed a change for
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6769 to master.
I'm not sure about the API right now, but it allows you to easily use
any other map implementation.
Caffeine's Cache#asMap() should work fine with here, although I didn't
test it myself.
Hi Sven,
I was thinking about this as well.
SoftReferences worked well in my application. G1GC seems to start to evict
them when -XX:InitiatingHeapOccupancyPercent is reached. In my case, when
the heap is around 60% full.
But as you said, there is no real control over which references are
Hi Thomas,
I've did a little research on using SoftReferences for caches:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/264582/is-there-a-softhashmap-in-java
http://jeremymanson.blogspot.com/2009/07/how-hotspot-decides-to-clear_07.html
The experts seem to agree that depending on the GC to clean up your
Hi Sven,
That's good to hear! Please let me know when you have an implementation and
I'll give it another go.
Best regards,
Thomas
On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 11:01 PM Sven Meier wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> actually not bad news at all (for Wicket 9 at least).
>
> The old page manager implementation
Hi Thomas,
actually not bad news at all (for Wicket 9 at least).
The old page manager implementation had so many special concepts and
solutions, it's easy to miss one.
A soft reference feature can easily be added/restored. I'm already
checking where it fits best.
Thanks for your thorough
Hi all,
Bad news. My application was caught in a GC loop after running for 8 hours.
The old generation was exhausted.
I couldn't get a heap dump at that time but restarted the application, took
a heap dump after about an hour, and reverted back to Wicket 8.
The problem is this: The heap was
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 4:01 PM Thomas Heigl wrote:
> FYI: I deployed Wicket 9.0.0-M5 to production an hour ago. 100k requests
> served and no issues so far.
>
Awesome!
Thank you for testing it!
>
> Great work!
>
> Thomas
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 3:13 PM Sven Meier wrote:
>
> > Many thanks
FYI: I deployed Wicket 9.0.0-M5 to production an hour ago. 100k requests
served and no issues so far.
Great work!
Thomas
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 3:13 PM Sven Meier wrote:
> Many thanks Maxim!
>
> Sven
>
> On 08.04.20 14:29, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> > Released :)
> >
> > On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at
Many thanks Maxim!
Sven
On 08.04.20 14:29, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
Released :)
On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 15:41, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
OK
Will start new release process in couple of hours
Please stop me if you will find any blocker :)
On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 14:36, Thomas Heigl wrote:
Hi
Released :)
On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 15:41, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>
> OK
>
> Will start new release process in couple of hours
> Please stop me if you will find any blocker :)
>
> On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 14:36, Thomas Heigl wrote:
>>
>> Hi Maxim,
>>
>> It works for me now!
>>
>> Thomas
>>
>> On
OK
Will start new release process in couple of hours
Please stop me if you will find any blocker :)
On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 14:36, Thomas Heigl wrote:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> It works for me now!
>
> Thomas
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 9:17 AM Maxim Solodovnik
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks a million!
> >
> > On
Hi Maxim,
It works for me now!
Thomas
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 9:17 AM Maxim Solodovnik
wrote:
> Thanks a million!
>
> On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 14:10, Thomas Heigl wrote:
> >
> > Hi Maxim,
> >
> > I'm testing against the snapshot now. Will get back to you shortly.
> >
> > Thomas
> >
> > On Wed,
Thanks a million!
On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 14:10, Thomas Heigl wrote:
>
> Hi Maxim,
>
> I'm testing against the snapshot now. Will get back to you shortly.
>
> Thomas
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 2:53 AM Maxim Solodovnik
> wrote:
>
> > Hello All,
> >
> > M5 seems to be broken (deploy has failed more
Hi Maxim,
I'm testing against the snapshot now. Will get back to you shortly.
Thomas
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 2:53 AM Maxim Solodovnik
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> M5 seems to be broken (deploy has failed more than 10 times during my
> build attempts)
> I have to start another release
> Could you
Hello All,
M5 seems to be broken (deploy has failed more than 10 times during my
build attempts)
I have to start another release
Could you please tell when can I start?
On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 07:01, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>
> Hello Thomas,
>
> Please test M6-SNAPSHOT (so I don't have to release
Hello Thomas,
Please test M6-SNAPSHOT (so I don't have to release M5.2 :
On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 02:39, Thomas Heigl wrote:
>
> Hi Maxim,
>
> That would be great. I want to do some more extensive testing and then
> deploy M5 into production. ;)
>
> Thomas
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 7:50 PM
Hi Maxim,
That would be great. I want to do some more extensive testing and then
deploy M5 into production. ;)
Thomas
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 7:50 PM Maxim Solodovnik
wrote:
> I can pack another release
> later this week ...
>
> On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 00:48, Thomas Heigl wrote:
> >
> > Thanks
I can pack another release
later this week ...
On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 00:48, Thomas Heigl wrote:
>
> Thanks Sven!
>
> Did your changes make it into the release? Or did they just miss it?
>
> Thomas
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 7:43 PM Sven Meier wrote:
>
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > yes, you're right:
>
Thanks Sven!
Did your changes make it into the release? Or did they just miss it?
Thomas
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 7:43 PM Sven Meier wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> yes, you're right:
>
> wicketstuff data stores missed some adjustments to the latest updates in
> wicket-core.
>
> And
Hi Thomas,
yes, you're right:
wicketstuff data stores missed some adjustments to the latest updates in
wicket-core.
And SessionQuotaManagingDataStore$DelegatedPage must be serializable of
course.
I've pushed changes to wicketstuff master.
Thanks
Sven
On 07.04.20 14:14, Thomas Heigl
And one more thing. There is now a warning logged just before serialization:
WARN o.a.w.pageStore.AsynchronousPageStore: Delegated page store
> 'org.apache.wicket.pageStore.SerializingPageStore' can not be asynchronous
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 2:09 PM Thomas Heigl wrote:
> The cause is the
The cause is the following MetaData entry in the session:
class
> org.wicketstuff.datastores.common.SessionQuotaManagingDataStore$1=org.wicketstuff.datastores.common.SessionQuotaManagingDataStore$SizeLimitedData@4090594a
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 1:59 PM Thomas Heigl wrote:
> Hi Sven,
>
> I just
Hi Sven,
I just found time to give this a try with Wicket 9.0.0-M5. There seem to be
issues with serialization now.
My new config:
protected IPageStore newCachingStore(IPageStore pageStore) {
> return new CachingPageStore(pageStore, new InMemoryPageStore(getName(),
>
Thanks Sven!
That looks much better. I'll give it a try as soon as I can.
Best regards,
Thomas
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 2:23 PM Sven Meier wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> your question comes at the right time.
>
> I was able to improve the implementation with a new CachingPageStore:
>
>
>
Hi Thomas,
your question comes at the right time.
I was able to improve the implementation with a new CachingPageStore:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/8df3528dc44a08b7d375c20e764a3664cd6a5f30/wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/DefaultPageManagerProvider.java#L145
You can now
Hi Thomas,
I thought I covered that usecase, but I will have to take a look.
Thanks for testing Wicket 9
Sven
On 25.03.20 20:10, Thomas Heigl wrote:
Maybe the same approach could be used as for InSessionPageStore that can be
used as cache and a store:
Maybe the same approach could be used as for InSessionPageStore that can be
used as cache and a store:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/894799e01227781be76886b2d1cdb2a424c812e0
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 6:35 PM Thomas Heigl wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just merged our master in our Wicket 9
Hi all,
I just merged our master in our Wicket 9 branch and I ran into an issue:
Our current configuration with Wicket 8 looks like this:
PageStore = PerSessionPageStore
DataStore = RedisDataStore
So the page store keeps the last couple of pages of a session in memory and
Redis is used as a
31 matches
Mail list logo
