Re: Panel that replaces surrogate element rather than contained within it

;> >> >> Sam >> >> >> >> -- >> >> View this message in context: >> >> >> http://www.nabble.com/Panel-that-replaces-surrogate-element-rather-than-contained-within-it-tp16894472p16894472.html >> >> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> >>

Re: Panel that replaces surrogate element rather than contained within it

oot > >> element > >> > >> my output would be: > >> > >> <ul>Must only have a single root element > >> > >> I've almost got this behaviour by using setRenderBodyOn

Re: Panel that replaces surrogate element rather than contained within it

> >> <wicket:panel>Must only have a single root >> element >> >> my output would be: >> >> <ul>Must only have a single root element >> >> I've almost got this behaviour by using setRenderBodyOnly(true); but >> then I >

Re: Panel that replaces surrogate element rather than contained within it

lement >> >> I've almost got this behaviour by using setRenderBodyOnly(true); but then >> I loose the id I need for Ajax partial updates. >> >> Any thoughts? >> >> Thanks >> >> Sam >> > > -- View this message in conte

Re: Panel that replaces surrogate element rather than contained within it

ghts? > > Thanks > > Sam > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Panel-that-replaces-surrogate-element-rather-than-contained-within-it-tp16894472p16895545.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Panel that replaces surrogate element rather than contained within it

ghts? > > Thanks > > Sam > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Panel-that-replaces-surrogate-element-rather-than-contained-within-it-tp16894472p16895539.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Panel that replaces surrogate element rather than contained within it

tes. > > Any thoughts? > > Thanks > > Sam > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Panel-that-replaces-surrogate-element-rather-than-contained-within-it-tp16894472p16894472.html > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nab

Re: Panel that replaces surrogate element rather than contained within it

Only(true); but then I > loose the id I need for Ajax partial updates. > > Any thoughts? > > Thanks > > Sam > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Panel-that-replaces-surrogat

Panel that replaces surrogate element rather than contained within it

ngle root element my output would be: <ul>Must only have a single root element I've almost got this behaviour by using setRenderBodyOnly(true); but then I loose the id I need for Ajax partial updates. Any thoughts? Thanks Sam -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.co