An advantage could be that cayenne is supported as a default persistent
solution.
There is not much magic in using Cayenne with Wicket. It depends on your
needs, but basically this is all you need:
public class DataObjectModel implements IModel
Cheers,
Adrian
-
I looked at click. Its not just HTML and just java like wicket. Lack of
documentation and books and less widgets.
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Giovanni wrote:
> Apache Click is very similar to Wicket:
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/click/
>
> What are the main differences and advantages?
uld anyone here provide a good look css for the wicket? I think wicket
with a good look css can beat them.
Regards!
Jing
-Original Message-
From: Martin Makundi [mailto:martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com]
Sent: Freitag, 29. Januar 2010 17:14
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Click
@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Click
Hi!
I guess click comes with its own layout.. like Vaadin
http://demo.vaadin.com/sampler/
**
Martin
2010/1/29 Giovanni :
> Apache Click is very similar to Wicket:
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/click/
>
> What are the main differences
Hi!
I guess click comes with its own layout.. like Vaadin
http://demo.vaadin.com/sampler/
**
Martin
2010/1/29 Giovanni :
> Apache Click is very similar to Wicket:
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/click/
>
> What are the main differences and advantages?
>
> regards
> giovanni
>
>
>
>
