Hi,
for me the main disadvantage of click is that it uses velocity instead
pure html.
Then click has probably less publicity/mailing support and less components.
An advantage could be that cayenne is supported as a default persistent
solution.
Search for wicket vs click or sth. like (was useful for me).
> I think wicket with a good look css can beat them.
This is the great thing about wicket: just let the designer do the
design their html ;-) and I will code (fast!).
No need for GSP, JSF, rhtml, JSP, velocity, xslt ...
Regards,
Peter.
Wow!
Vaadin looks really cool!
Could anyone here provide a good look css for the wicket? I think wicket
with a good look css can beat them.
Regards!
Jing
-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Makundi [mailto:martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com]
Sent: Freitag, 29. Januar 2010 17:14
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Click
Hi!
I guess click comes with its own layout.. like Vaadin
http://demo.vaadin.com/sampler/
**
Martin
2010/1/29 Giovanni<pino_o...@yahoo.com>:
Apache Click is very similar to Wicket:
http://incubator.apache.org/click/
What are the main differences and advantages?
regards
giovanni
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Free your timetabling!
http://timefinder.sourceforge.net/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
