Who is talking about wrapping GWT components? What I'm saying is that
the kind of functionality you would use to create partially offline
applications, like HTML 5's web storage, you can wrap in a Wicket
component.
What's so strange about that? We do that all the time with JavaScript
widgets. So t
i just dont see the point of wrapping a page made up of gwt components
in wicket wrappers. the *entire* front end has to live on the frontend
in order for the application to work offline...so whats the point?
anyways my two cents.
cheers,
-igor
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Eelco Hillenius
wr
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> having data only on the client will not help you unless you also have
> behavior. these kinds of apps are really only feasible when you use a
> clientside framework like gwt.
Any components you write wouldn't use the typical client/ server
i
having data only on the client will not help you unless you also have
behavior. these kinds of apps are really only feasible when you use a
clientside framework like gwt.
-igor
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Eelco Hillenius
wrote:
>> I am working on an application that i want to enable to work
> I am working on an application that i want to enable to work offline. I want
> to use wicket for this. Any ideas. I would like uses to fill and submit
> forms even when working offline and then the data is synchronised later. Is
> it possible? all manner of suggestions/links are welcome.
Isn't t
What you describe here is different than what was implied by your first
comment.
What you now seem to be asking is this. Please verify:
You have multiple install sites (satellite offices, etc), and each of them
has a server that runs the application on its own. Users from that location
will con
I was thinking that i could install the same application on each site, then
have the databases synchronized somehow. My CTO will have me for lunch if i
suggest this.
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Frank Silbermann <
frank.silberm...@fedex.com> wrote:
> Any application that executes _offline_ is
Hej,
2010/2/19 Frank Silbermann :
> Any application that executes _offline_ is not a _web_ application --
> unless the system consists of a stand-alone application containing a web
> server that runs on the client (e.g. via jetty) so that both client and
> server are running on the same box.
That
Since Wicket stores state on the server side in the session (and page
store), I'd say you're going to have a rough time with this one. This
has been discussed before:
http://markmail.org/message/pkzmsbmtppg72abg
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Josh Kamau wrote:
> Hi guys;
>
> I am working on
Any application that executes _offline_ is not a _web_ application --
unless the system consists of a stand-alone application containing a web
server that runs on the client (e.g. via jetty) so that both client and
server are running on the same box.
Theoretically, a Wicket application that runs o
Any way of integrating Google Gears or apache derby DB ?
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Josh Kamau wrote:
> Hi guys;
>
> I am working on an application that i want to enable to work offline. I
> want to use wicket for this. Any ideas. I would like uses to fill and submit
> forms even when wor
11 matches
Mail list logo
