I'm one of those poor guys stuck with IBM Websphere Portal 5 and 6,
which are both Java 1.4. We can still use Java 5 for the core of our
application by seperating the frontend stuff into its own project, and
having retrotranslator modify the core jar file before putting it into
the 1.4 web
and still it is not that 1.3 is dead at this time
We will have 1 or 2 releases more so we wil try to get it as stable as
possible so that people that cant use 1.4 yes
will have a pretty solid 1.3
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Jörn Zaefferer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm one of those poor
yes, generics! It would make the model business so much more clear.
ryan
Enrique Rodriguez wrote:
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Ned Collyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW +1 to java5 and 1.3.
Generics == joy, especially with the model stuff wicket uses :)
Same here; would like to see
+1 for generics
On Mar 17, 2008, at 8:33 AM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
yes, generics! It would make the model business so much more clear.
ryan
Enrique Rodriguez wrote:
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Ned Collyer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW +1 to java5 and 1.3.
Generics == joy,
+1 for 'Option B': 1.4=generics, drop java 1.4 support
This is coming from a large DoD application (notoriously behind the
technology power curve), the only thing not generified is our UI (Wicket)
stuff.
I think maintaining 'one behind' JVM compatibility is sufficient. I mean,
come on... Java
+1 for moving to java 5
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 12:45 AM, Gabor Szokoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Your conclusion covers our case, but I'd debate your reasoning:
We use java 5, deploy to GlassFish.
No nostalgic attachments to pre-generics Java :-)
But we believe these (including
On 3/16/08, Maarten Bosteels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for moving to java 5
+1 for moving to Java 5 *quickly* :)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
java 5 now definitely
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 7:48 PM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 3/16/08, Maarten Bosteels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for moving to java 5
+1 for moving to Java 5 *quickly* :)
-
To
+1 to java 5
atul singh wrote:
java 5 now definitely
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 7:48 PM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 3/16/08, Maarten Bosteels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for moving to java 5
+1 for moving to Java 5 *quickly* :)
Another YES for 1.5
Phil
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:12 AM, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 (non binding) for a quick x-m1 with only generics release
Maurice
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Thijs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 to java 5
atul singh wrote:
java 5 now
On Mar 16, 2008, at 16:58 , Phil Grimm wrote:
Another YES for 1.5
Phil
+1
--
Fabrizio Giudici, Ph.D. - Java Architect, Project Manager
Tidalwave s.a.s. - We make Java work. Everywhere.
weblogs.java.net/blog/fabriziogiudici - www.tidalwave.it/blog
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - mobile: +39 348.150.6941
its binding now...
-igor
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 (non binding) for a quick x-m1 with only generics release
Maurice
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Thijs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 to java 5
atul singh wrote:
+1 for Java 5 Generics
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
its binding now...
-igor
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 (non binding) for a quick x-m1 with only generics release
Maurice
+1 for Java 5 Generics
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Sent: 3/16/08 4:45 PM
Subject: Re: Planning Wicket Next Generation
+1 for Java 5 Generics
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
its binding now...
-igor
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL
: 3/16/08 4:45 PM
Subject: Re: Planning Wicket Next Generation
+1 for Java 5 Generics
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
its binding now...
-igor
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
+1 (non
that need Java 1.4.
Jeremy Thomerson
-- sent from a wireless device
-Original Message-
From: Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Sent: 3/16/08 4:45 PM
Subject: Re: Planning Wicket Next Generation
+1 for Java 5 Generics
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Igor
. What do the core developers think?
Jeremy Thomerson
-- sent from a wireless device
-Original Message-
From: Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Sent: 3/16/08 6:34 PM
Subject: Re: Planning Wicket Next Generation
it was already on the user list
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008
Message-
From: Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Sent: 3/16/08 6:34 PM
Subject: Re: Planning Wicket Next Generation
it was already on the user list
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 11:16 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been surprised that we have
FWIW +1 to java5 and 1.3.
Generics == joy, especially with the model stuff wicket uses :)
igor.vaynberg wrote:
Personally all my projects are on java 1.5 at least, so I would love
to have a quick 1.4 release and drop 1.3. But that's just me.
-igor
--
View this message in context:
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Ned Collyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW +1 to java5 and 1.3.
Generics == joy, especially with the model stuff wicket uses :)
Same here; would like to see generics.
Enrique
-
To
So far, no one has said they need Java 1.4. So, how do we request that a
vote is started for this?
Option A - Generics go in 1.4-M1, we still support 1.3, and 1.4 will be the
next big-feature release, many months from now
Option B - Generics *are *1.4, we drop support for 1.3 (and Java 1.4), and
PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 14. März 2008 22:49
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: Planning Wicket Next Generation
...and the answer is: We would like to see java5-only major
release
*ASAP* If you are going to add many new features in the next major
Hi,
Your conclusion covers our case, but I'd debate your reasoning:
We use java 5, deploy to GlassFish.
No nostalgic attachments to pre-generics Java :-)
But we believe these (including wicket) to be established
technologies, and would hate to jump to significantly less mature
platforms (like
24 matches
Mail list logo
