We are using Wicket 6 .0 on OC4j 10.1.3.5. This is a Servlet 2.4 container
with support of some Servlet api 2.5 features.
Work well here.
The quickstart application works on OC4J (
http://wicket.apache.org/start/quickstart.html). (some slight modification
is needed when using Wicket via a web.xml
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Joachim Schrod wrote:
>> I'd like to add my voice to Martijn's comment that there are still
>> people out there who have no choice but to use 1.4. Typically guys
>> who have to support Wicket apps on app servers with no servlet-2.5-api.
>
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Joachim Schrod wrote:
> I'd like to add my voice to Martijn's comment that there are still
> people out there who have no choice but to use 1.4. Typically guys
> who have to support Wicket apps on app servers with no servlet-2.5-api.
I'm not 100% sure, but did you
Martin Grigorov wrote:
>
> Additionally I think that everything that is related to Wicket 1.4 and less
> should be removed from the Wiki.
I'd like to add my voice to Martijn's comment that there are still
people out there who have no choice but to use 1.4. Typically guys
who have to support Wicke
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> everyone can edit the wiki pages. All you need is to create an account.
>
> Additionally I think that everything that is related to Wicket 1.4 and less
> should be removed from the Wiki.
Funny, I just gave a presentation to a institution
Hi,
everyone can edit the wiki pages. All you need is to create an account.
Additionally I think that everything that is related to Wicket 1.4 and less
should be removed from the Wiki.
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Lucio Crusca wrote:
> In data venerdì 7 dicembre 2012 20:06:45, Jeremy Thome
In data venerdì 7 dicembre 2012 20:06:45, Jeremy Thomerson ha scritto:
> Yep. There was a big change to constructors IIRC, although I can't
> remember exactly what the change was. Next came 1.3.0 with generics.
>
Can I (we, you, ...) edit that sentence from the wiki pages then? It's
confusing
Instead of adding components to their parents, you provide a child
with their parent at construction time. The idea was that it would
help in parsing, component construction and better feedback when
creating pages. The burden it imposed outweighed the benefits be a
great margin.
Martijn
On Fri, D
Yep. There was a big change to constructors IIRC, although I can't
remember exactly what the change was. Next came 1.3.0 with generics.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://wickettraining.com
*Need a CMS for Wicket? Use Brix! http://brixcms.org*
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Pierre Goupil wrote:
Good evening,
It's an old experiment which was due to go to "ready for prime-time" but
never succeeded. If I remember correctly, it was before what became Wicket
1.3.
Regards,
Pierre
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Lucio Crusca wrote:
> Hello *,
>
> while reading this page
>
> https://cwiki.
Gerald Fernando wrote:
Hello Friends,
Am Gerald, new to wicket.
can anyone say about wicket and advantages over other technologies
it is very useful to my next step.
please help me
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=wicket+advantages
--
---
This is probably a good starting point:
http://wicket.apache.org/introduction.html
Craig
-Original Message-
From: Gerald Fernando [mailto:gerald.anto.ferna...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 8:51 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: what is wicket
Hello Friends,
Am Gerald, new
Have a look at the documentation: http://wicket.apache.org/introduction.html
Linda
Gerald Fernando wrote:
Hello Friends,
Am Gerald, new to wicket.
can anyone say about wicket and advantages over other technologies
it is very useful to my next step.
please help me
Thanks&Regards,
Gerald A
-
Well... comparing to what other technologies? There are plenty of
resources on the net. Just use your favourite search engine.
You may want to start with this:
http://ptrthomas.wordpress.com/2007/05/14/a-wicket-user-tries-jsf/
Francisco
2009/7/14 Gerald Fernando :
> Hello Friends,
> Am Gerald, n
Hello Gerald,
You can find much of this kind of information on http://wicket.apache.org.
Regards,
Erik.
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 18:21:16 +0530, Gerald Fernando
wrote:
> Hello Friends,
> Am Gerald, new to wicket.
> can anyone say about wicket and advantages over other technologies
> it is very
wow.
thanks.
That was very helpful :)
Eyal
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 12:08 AM, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Wicket supports private state for individual components, whereas the
> traditional (REST) pattern assumes to take the state out (to string
> based request parameters) and up t
Wicket supports private state for individual components, whereas the
traditional (REST) pattern assumes to take the state out (to string
based request parameters) and up to the request level. The big
difference is that without using a framework like Wicket, you can't
really create self contained co
17 matches
Mail list logo
