Re: Wicket 6.0 WebSocket question: client API

2012-06-20 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi Pierre, Take a look at https://github.com/martin-g/wicket-native-websocket-example/blob/master/src/main/resources/org/apache/wicket/websocket/jetty/example/client.js There is Wicket.WebSocket object which basically wraps native window.WebSocket just to be able to intercept the calls and send

Re: Wicket 6.0 WebSocket question: client API

2012-06-20 Thread Pierre Goupil
Great! Thanks a lot! Regards, Pierre On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.orgwrote: Hi Pierre, Take a look at https://github.com/martin-g/wicket-native-websocket-example/blob/master/src/main/resources/org/apache/wicket/websocket/jetty/example/client.js

RE: wicket 6.0

2012-05-09 Thread Hielke Hoeve
Hi Tom, We now have a working WiQuery 6. I will release a new snapshot tonight, but you can clone it from github already. Hielke -Original Message- From: Tom Eugelink [mailto:t...@tbee.org] Sent: vrijdag 13 april 2012 14:44 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: wicket 6.0 On 2012

Re: wicket 6.0

2012-05-09 Thread Tom Eugelink
Eugelink [mailto:t...@tbee.org] Sent: vrijdag 13 april 2012 14:44 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: wicket 6.0 On 2012-04-13 14:24, Martin Grigorov wrote: How many of you tried beta1 ? I started off with 6, but was afraid things like wiquery would conflict in the usage of jquery, so I

Re: wicket 6.0

2012-04-15 Thread vineet semwal
hi martin-g , https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1175 please check my comment on it... On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote: On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Francois Meillet qq...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I use 6, everything is ok but I

Re: wicket 6.0

2012-04-13 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi, beta1 has been released at March 26 and so far there were 3 tickets for it. 2 of them made small API improvements. So it is either rock solid or there are not that many users of it. I think it is stable enough for RC but we wanted to receive more feedback about the changes because we'd like

Re: wicket 6.0

2012-04-13 Thread Tom Eugelink
On 2012-04-13 14:24, Martin Grigorov wrote: How many of you tried beta1 ? I started off with 6, but was afraid things like wiquery would conflict in the usage of jquery, so I returned to safety using 1.5.5. Should that be a problem? Otherwise I'll upgrade back to 6. Tom

Re: wicket 6.0

2012-04-13 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi Tom On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Tom Eugelink t...@tbee.org wrote: On 2012-04-13 14:24, Martin Grigorov wrote: How many of you tried beta1 ? I started off with 6, but was afraid things like wiquery would conflict in the usage of jquery, so I returned to safety using 1.5.5. Should

Re: wicket 6.0

2012-04-13 Thread Francois Meillet
Hi, I use 6, everything is ok but I encounter a problem with DatePicker. No event when there is an update. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4496 François Le 13 avr. 2012 à 14:24, Martin Grigorov a écrit : Hi, beta1 has been released at March 26 and so far there were 3 tickets

Re: wicket 6.0

2012-04-13 Thread Martin Grigorov
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Francois Meillet qq...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I use 6, everything is ok but I encounter a problem with DatePicker. No event when there is an update. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4496 This is a problem in 1.5.x too so it is not 6.x

Re: Wicket 6.0 and Javascript Event Registration question

2012-01-30 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi, The new code registers listeners with jQuery's on() method which uses internally addEventListener() (IE9 and others) and attachEvent() (IE8 and less). So you need to execute your JS code after Wicket's. Wicket executes its bindings when the DOM is ready, so you must be careful that your

Re: Wicket 6.0 and Javascript Event Registration question

2012-01-30 Thread Thomas Götz
This will cause quite some trouble for the application I'm currently developing. Example: we have a Behavior that puts input hints on several textfields (e.g. dd/mm/ for day input fields). The Behavior provides a JS file in which we register for the submit event of the containing form and

Re: Wicket 6.0 and Javascript Event Registration question

2012-01-30 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi Thomas, On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Thomas Götz t...@richmountain.de wrote: This will cause quite some trouble for the application I'm currently developing. Example: we have a Behavior that puts input hints on several textfields (e.g. dd/mm/ for day input fields). The

Re: Wicket 6.0 + JavaScriptFilteredIntoFooterHeaderResponse + CssHeaderItem

2012-01-08 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi Rob, On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 8:12 AM, robert.mcguinness robert.mcguinness@gmail.com wrote: kk, got it working again by overriding /CssAcceptingHeaderResponseFilter#accepts/  /item instanceof CssHeaderItem || item instanceof PageHeaderItem/ also, for some js frameworks like

Re: Wicket 6.0 + JavaScriptFilteredIntoFooterHeaderResponse + CssHeaderItem

2012-01-08 Thread robert.mcguinness
done. thank martin. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4328 -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-6-0-JavaScriptFilteredIntoFooterHeaderResponse-CssHeaderItem-tp4274687p4276477.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at

Re: Wicket 6.0 + JavaScriptFilteredIntoFooterHeaderResponse + CssHeaderItem

2012-01-07 Thread robert.mcguinness
kk, got it working again by overriding /CssAcceptingHeaderResponseFilter#accepts/ /item instanceof CssHeaderItem || item instanceof PageHeaderItem/ also, for some js frameworks like *modernizr.js* and *respond.js*, they require these libs to live in the in the head tag. to target the head