Ok, this is fun. It was due to an error in my script.
I've been doing Java for so many years that I forgot how to use a
dynamic
language. I guess I'm too used to having the compiler tell me how much
of
an idiot I am so I have less pain at runtime. ;-)
Humans aren't perfect - that's why humans
Hi, Chris,
I tend to agree with you, that's why I prefer Java over Javascript.
However, I need to write a few components, so I'm wondering what
others do to help them avoid these types of errors that would normally
be caught at compile time.
Cheers,
=David
On Jul 5, 2010, at 6:41 PM,
:) You could try to write some unit test, with rhino, it should be fairly
simple.. Just wriite a junit test that executes a rhino test which in turn
parses your js.. :)
As someone mentioned to me once, In java you can always add a new layer of
abstraction :)
2010/7/5 David Leangen
Yeah it does seems as a problem.. what if you try putting in dummy functions
with alerts in them?
2010/7/3 David Leangen wic...@leangen.net
Ok, thanks,
So, if it should be ok, I wonder why after the first execution, I only get
INFO: Channel busy - postponing...
So I can't use my
Ok, this is fun. It was due to an error in my script.
I've been doing Java for so many years that I forgot how to use a dynamic
language. I guess I'm too used to having the compiler tell me how much of an
idiot I am so I have less pain at runtime. ;-)
BTW, for you experts in js, is there any
I should add that in my onCloseHandler, I have this in my js:
$('#popup #popup-close-link').click(function (e)
{
e.preventDefault();
$('#popup-mask, #popup-window').hide();
if( url != )
wicketAjaxGet(url, null, null, null);
Should be ok I guess, heres the definition of it, ..:
function wicketAjaxGet(url, successHandler, failureHandler, precondition)
2010/7/3 David Leangen wic...@leangen.net
I should add that in my onCloseHandler, I have this in my js:
$('#popup #popup-close-link').click(function (e)
Ok, thanks,
So, if it should be ok, I wonder why after the first execution, I only
get
INFO: Channel busy - postponing...
So I can't use my component more than once...
On Jul 3, 2010, at 10:36 PM, nino martinez wael wrote:
Should be ok I guess, heres the definition of it, ..:
