Re: Proposal: the browser as a desktop client

2008-10-23 Thread Johan Compagner
use GWT because thats the key difference between wicket and gwt I only see some things like validators that could be precompiled not th complete webapp and all your current page/panel/component/html code On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 3:44 PM, cowwoc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'd like to

Re: Proposal: the browser as a desktop client

2008-10-23 Thread Johan Compagner
because on the server the business logic runs Its a complete different paradigm if thinks that are now done in onclick() or onsubmit() would run on the client what would be possible then? Currently many people just call DAO's there (spring stuff and so on) johan On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 11:40

Re: Proposal: the browser as a desktop client

2008-10-23 Thread Igor Vaynberg
so write a prototype and present it to the community. we are all eyes. -igor On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 2:40 PM, cowwoc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: GWT generates business logic, HTML and CSS from Java code; as opposed to letting you bind business logic written in Java against normal HTML files. It

Re: Proposal: the browser as a desktop client

2008-10-23 Thread cowwoc
Johan, I'm not saying you should move *everything* over to the client. I'm saying that most form manipulation can take place without querying the database, especially on a per-request basis. Adding rows and cell validation tend to rely on at most one database lookup (during the initial request).

Re: Proposal: the browser as a desktop client

2008-10-22 Thread cowwoc
I just to clarify one point. You would still have three types of components: HTML CSS Java You would still be binding the Java code against HTML IDs (clean separation of concerns). The only thing that would change is where the Java code executes. -- View this message in context: