Done:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/190
https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/191
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Martin Grigorov
wrote:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> Please do!
>
> Thank you!
>
> On Nov 16, 2016 10:58 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" wrote:
>
Hi Maxim,
Please do!
Thank you!
On Nov 16, 2016 10:58 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" wrote:
> I believe all comments are now addressed,
> Should I create PR to add AjaxDownload to wicket-extensions? both 7.x and
> 8.x?
>
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 6:11 PM, Sven Meier
I believe all comments are now addressed,
Should I create PR to add AjaxDownload to wicket-extensions? both 7.x and
8.x?
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 6:11 PM, Sven Meier wrote:
> +1 on putting it into wicket-extensions.
>
> Sven
>
>
> Am 11.11.2016 um 10:54 schrieb Martin Grigorov:
+1 on putting it into wicket-extensions.
Sven
Am 11.11.2016 um 10:54 schrieb Martin Grigorov:
One class + one .js might be too much for a new module but I don't want all
the useless stuff in minis in my application too.
I still prefer this to be in Wicket core.
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training
In this case it might be good idea to create "full" wicketstuff
project, then move it to core
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> One class + one .js might be too much for a new module but I don't want all
> the useless stuff in minis in my application
One class + one .js might be too much for a new module but I don't want all
the useless stuff in minis in my application too.
I still prefer this to be in Wicket core.
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Sven Meier
Ok, will try to do it in the beginning of next week
Thanks for the pointer
WBR, Maxim
(from mobile, sorry for the typos)
On Nov 11, 2016 16:28, "Sven Meier" wrote:
> I don't think this warrants a new module - just add it to
> wicketstuff-minis.
>
> Sven
>
>
> Am 11.11.2016 um
I don't think this warrants a new module - just add it to wicketstuff-minis.
Sven
Am 11.11.2016 um 08:42 schrieb Martin Grigorov:
Great work, Maxim!
Let's move it to WicketStuff as a new module.
I'd like to add -examples module with different use cases so we can see
whether the iframes leak
Great work, Maxim!
Let's move it to WicketStuff as a new module.
I'd like to add -examples module with different use cases so we can see
whether the iframes leak or not for example.
Also I'd like to try to add events like beforeDownload/afterDownload so
apps can show indicators that something is
Thanks for sharing. I just added a couple of comments/
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 4:23 AM, Maxim Solodovnik
wrote:
> Hello Martin,
>
> sorry for the delay
>
> here is the repo: https://github.com/solomax/wicket-ajax-download
> here is the commit with the
Hello Martin,
sorry for the delay
here is the repo: https://github.com/solomax/wicket-ajax-download
here is the commit with the ajax-download-via-iframe implementation:
https://github.com/solomax/wicket-ajax-download/commit/407936d6f506aa047d9a12a3ecb7aa6c866eb052
Looking forward for your
Hi Maxim,
Do you have progress on this ?
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Maxim Solodovnik
wrote:
> I was hoping to get answer like: in 7.x you should use .xxx :)))
> Going to create example
+1 for wicket-stuff
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Martin Grigorov
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Maxim Solodovnik
> wrote:
>
> > I was hoping to get answer like: in 7.x you should use .xxx :)))
> > Going to create example on github
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Maxim Solodovnik
wrote:
> I was hoping to get answer like: in 7.x you should use .xxx :)))
> Going to create example on github and will send it for review :)
>
Good! Thanks!
I think we should add AjaxDownload class either to Wicket core
I was hoping to get answer like: in 7.x you should use .xxx :)))
Going to create example on github and will send it for review :)
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Martin Grigorov
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Maxim Solodovnik
> wrote:
>
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Maxim Solodovnik
wrote:
> It seems iframe is the only option :(((
>
Why so sad ?
iframe is a good option
> here is the JS plugin wrapping this idea:
> http://johnculviner.com/jquery-file-download-plugin-
>
It seems iframe is the only option :(((
here is the JS plugin wrapping this idea:
http://johnculviner.com/jquery-file-download-plugin-for-ajax-like-feature-rich-file-downloads/
going to perform additional search
Thanks for the idea!
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> or maybe use a hidden iframe to trigger download...
>
this should be simpler
with the tabs some blocker may prevent it
>
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> reier...@gmail.com>
or maybe use a hidden iframe to trigger download...
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I do not know if this is possible but
>
> 1- Open a new tab
> 2- Set location to download URL
> 3- Close the new tab
>
> That way (maybe) page does not
I do not know if this is possible but
1- Open a new tab
2- Set location to download URL
3- Close the new tab
That way (maybe) page does not close WebSocket connection. It would still
be "AJAX"...
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Maxim Solodovnik
wrote:
> I'm afraid It
>> Maxim said: websocket.close() triggers the ajax download.
Nope, sorry for my English
I said
For some reason at the moment download is initiated
WebSocketBehavior::onClose is being called
so user clicks "Download", and then, as the result WebSocket#onClose() is
being called
I would
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 8:46 AM, Sven Meier wrote:
> AjaxDownload changes the window location - the browser probably prepares
> unloading of the page, before opening the attached download in a separate
> window.
>
This could be the reason but it is the other way around of what
I'm afraid It would be not really Ajax .
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> maybe open a second browser tab and do the download there...
>
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Maxim Solodovnik
> wrote:
>
> > I'll try
maybe open a second browser tab and do the download there...
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Maxim Solodovnik
wrote:
> I'll try to create quick-start ASAP
>
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Maxim Solodovnik
> wrote:
>
> > AjaxDownload was for wicket
I'll try to create quick-start ASAP
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Maxim Solodovnik
wrote:
> AjaxDownload was for wicket 1.5.x (or maybe 6.x)
> maybe it can be enhanced to work without unload?
>
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Sven Meier wrote:
>
>>
AjaxDownload was for wicket 1.5.x (or maybe 6.x)
maybe it can be enhanced to work without unload?
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Sven Meier wrote:
> AjaxDownload changes the window location - the browser probably prepares
> unloading of the page, before opening the attached
AjaxDownload changes the window location - the browser probably prepares
unloading of the page, before opening the attached download in a separate
window.
Sven
Am 03.11.2016 um 08:33 schrieb Martin Grigorov:
Hi Maxim,
I don't see any relation between those.
If it is easy to reproduce
Hi Maxim,
I don't see any relation between those.
If it is easy to reproduce please create a quickstart.
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 4:16 AM, Maxim Solodovnik
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Recently we found
28 matches
Mail list logo