to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 9:34 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: SingleSortState multiple sorts?
Yes, I too would prefer multisort to be in Wicket by default. It is much
more logical for the sort to be "stable", i.e., it sorts the *current*
list with respect
Sorts().get(0);
}
-Original Message-
From: Sebastiaan van Erk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 9:34 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: SingleSortState multiple sorts?
Yes, I too would prefer multisort to be in Wicket by default. It is much
more logica
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 9:23 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: RE: SingleSortState multiple sorts?
Ironically, your code looks very similar to what I have done on my end. Can we
create a feature request for this?
-Original Message-
From: Sebastiaan van Erk
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 9:23 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: RE: SingleSortState multiple sorts?
Ironically, your code looks very similar to what I have done on my end. Can we
create a feature request for this?
-Original Message-
From: Sebastiaan van Erk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ironically, your code looks very similar to what I have done on my end. Can we
create a feature request for this?
-Original Message-
From: Sebastiaan van Erk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 9:13 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: SingleSortState multiple
I wanted to have this the other day, so I came up with (see attached).
I'd like to see your ideas about it, since this was just a 20 minute
first hack...
IClusterable is just a tagging interface for the sole purpose of
clustering via Terracotta. So if you don't need TC, then Serializable
shou
I was looking into providing a List in a ISortState/IClusterable
(multiple version of SingleSortState) for a SortableDataProvider. Does the list
within the sort state need to be IClusterable?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PR
