Just wondering why must a local ejb be declared in web.xml? It would be a
nightmare if we have hundreds of them.
xiefei
20091220
> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:56:22 +0100
> From: majorpe...@sch.bme.hu
> Subject: Re: WicketStuff and wicket-contrib-javaee
> To: users@wicket.apache
Hi guys,
I now have commit rights to wicketstuff, but first I need to finish my
thesis and take some exams, but hopefully soon, the javaee-inject
project (had to rename the project) will appear in wicketstuff-core. ;)
Also because the rename, some package-renaming will happen too. As soon
as I'm f
Hi Peter,
When my response has "EJB" in it, it can't be MASSIVE because EJB, you
hardly worry about it.
EJB is great, easy to use, and Wicket with EJB is even better. VERY
powerful combination. The thing is it just works, and there is no need
to talk about it much, especially with the NetBeans Wi
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 00:26 +0100, Major Péter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Lately I had to make some refactoring in wicket-contrib-javaee, and I
> saw, that the project is not well maintained. In the repo I only could
> find the source for v1.0, but only on sourceforge did I found the v1.1
> sources. :s
Hi all,
Lately I had to make some refactoring in wicket-contrib-javaee, and I
saw, that the project is not well maintained. In the repo I only could
find the source for v1.0, but only on sourceforge did I found the v1.1
sources. :s
So after I had refactored the source to make it work with Wicket 1