Re: not addding componet in case of error

2009-12-14 Thread wicketnewuser
/not-addding-componet-in-case-of-error-tp26754430p26779962.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h

Re: not addding componet in case of error

2009-12-14 Thread wicketnewuser
-- regards, Vineet Semwal -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/not-addding-componet-in-case-of-error-tp26754430p26779967.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Re: not addding componet in case of error

2009-12-13 Thread Martijn Dashorst
Or just set visibility based on error On Saturday, December 12, 2009, vineet semwal vineetsemwal1...@gmail.com wrote: add empty webmarkupcontainers as your components,if no error,replace the containers with your components else you don't need to replace. On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 8:02 AM,

Re: not addding componet in case of error

2009-12-13 Thread vineet semwal
toggling visibility will always do, my idea was creating the actual component only if data is available . On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 2:05 AM, Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote: Or just set visibility based on error On Saturday, December 12, 2009, vineet semwal

not addding componet in case of error

2009-12-11 Thread Swarnim Ranjitkar
I have a case where I check some error condition at the beginning of the code. If there is error I just want to display error message so basically it is if (error == true){ display message } else { //render regular page add(component1) add(compnent2) } if there is error I don't have any data to

Re: not addding componet in case of error

2009-12-11 Thread vineet semwal
add empty webmarkupcontainers as your components,if no error,replace the containers with your components else you don't need to replace. On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Swarnim Ranjitkar swarn...@hotmail.comwrote: I have a case where I check some error condition at the beginning of the