Re: wicket-auth-roles and additional roles

2010-09-14 Thread mijnheer.spaghetti
You really need to use a lot of > features in Spring Security before it will save you time in the end. > -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-auth-roles-and-additional-roles-tp2538164p2539437.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nab

Re: wicket-auth-roles and additional roles

2010-09-13 Thread James Carman
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Brian Topping wrote: > The first time I secured a Wicket app, I went through great pains to use > someone else's framework.  But the fact is Wicket's security was designed by > geniuses, so it's a snap to work with.  You really need to use a lot of > features in

Re: wicket-auth-roles and additional roles

2010-09-13 Thread Brian Topping
t;> View this message in context: >> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-auth-roles-and-additional-roles-tp2538164p2538173.html >> Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> ---

Re: wicket-auth-roles and additional roles

2010-09-13 Thread James Carman
, Mike Dee wrote: > > Yes, not using Spring Security (yet).  But will keep your offer in mind. > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-auth-roles-and-additional-roles-tp2538164p2538188.html > Sent from the Users forum mailing list arc

Re: wicket-auth-roles and additional roles

2010-09-13 Thread Mike Dee
Yes, not using Spring Security (yet). But will keep your offer in mind. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-auth-roles-and-additional-roles-tp2538164p2538188.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Re: wicket-auth-roles and additional roles

2010-09-13 Thread James Carman
e Dee wrote: > > Thanks.  I'm going to try out wicket-auth-roles first.  I think it may be > good enough. > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-auth-roles-and-additional-roles-tp2538164p2538178.html > Sent

Re: wicket-auth-roles and additional roles

2010-09-13 Thread Mike Dee
Thanks. I'm going to try out wicket-auth-roles first. I think it may be good enough. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-auth-roles-and-additional-roles-tp2538164p2538178.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabbl

Re: wicket-auth-roles and additional roles

2010-09-13 Thread James Carman
 If there were, it could have > been problematic.  Fortunately, there are none. > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-auth-roles-and-additional-roles-tp2538164p2538173.html > Sent from the Users forum maili

Re: wicket-auth-roles and additional roles

2010-09-13 Thread Mike Dee
Yes, you're correct. I was just wondering if within wicket-auth-roles there were references to Roles.ADMIN or Roles.USER. If there were, it could have been problematic. Fortunately, there are none. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-auth-

Re: wicket-auth-roles and additional roles

2010-09-13 Thread James Carman
e if there are > any dependencies on the Roles.ADMIN and Roles.USER.  Maybe additional users > can be defined by just adding strings for new user types? Does anyone know > if there are dependencies? > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wi

wicket-auth-roles and additional roles

2010-09-13 Thread Mike Dee
nabble.com/wicket-auth-roles-and-additional-roles-tp2538164p2538164.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mai