You really need to use a lot of
> features in Spring Security before it will save you time in the end.
>
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-auth-roles-and-additional-roles-tp2538164p2539437.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nab
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Brian Topping wrote:
> The first time I secured a Wicket app, I went through great pains to use
> someone else's framework. But the fact is Wicket's security was designed by
> geniuses, so it's a snap to work with. You really need to use a lot of
> features in
t;> View this message in context:
>> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-auth-roles-and-additional-roles-tp2538164p2538173.html
>> Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>> ---
, Mike Dee wrote:
>
> Yes, not using Spring Security (yet). But will keep your offer in mind.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-auth-roles-and-additional-roles-tp2538164p2538188.html
> Sent from the Users forum mailing list arc
Yes, not using Spring Security (yet). But will keep your offer in mind.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-auth-roles-and-additional-roles-tp2538164p2538188.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com
e Dee wrote:
>
> Thanks. I'm going to try out wicket-auth-roles first. I think it may be
> good enough.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-auth-roles-and-additional-roles-tp2538164p2538178.html
> Sent
Thanks. I'm going to try out wicket-auth-roles first. I think it may be
good enough.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-auth-roles-and-additional-roles-tp2538164p2538178.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabbl
If there were, it could have
> been problematic. Fortunately, there are none.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-auth-roles-and-additional-roles-tp2538164p2538173.html
> Sent from the Users forum maili
Yes, you're correct. I was just wondering if within wicket-auth-roles there
were references to Roles.ADMIN or Roles.USER. If there were, it could have
been problematic. Fortunately, there are none.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-auth-
e if there are
> any dependencies on the Roles.ADMIN and Roles.USER. Maybe additional users
> can be defined by just adding strings for new user types? Does anyone know
> if there are dependencies?
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wi
nabble.com/wicket-auth-roles-and-additional-roles-tp2538164p2538164.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mai
11 matches
Mail list logo