Re: wicket 1.5 xml/doctype/html header: xhtml vs html5

2011-07-30 Thread Martijn Dashorst
You can use xhtml5 together with wicket if you like strict markup, or just plain html5. There are some (afaik undefined) rules about closing p and div tags, but other than that, (x)html5 should work. Martijn On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 7:04 AM, Donohoe Digital d...@donohoe.info wrote: From

Re: wicket 1.5 xml/doctype/html header: xhtml vs html5

2011-07-30 Thread robert.mcguinness
For Wicket *1.5* I've been using: lt;!DOCTYPE htmlgt; lt;html xmlns:wicket=http://wicket.apache.orggt; -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-1-5-xml-doctype-html-header-xhtml-vs-html5-tp3698608p3706667.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list

wicket 1.5 xml/doctype/html header: xhtml vs html5

2011-07-27 Thread Donohoe Digital
From https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/wickets-xhtml-tags.html, are these still the desired tags for the start of a wicket html file? ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; xmlns:wicket=http://wicket.apache.org/dtds.data/wicket-xhtml1.4-strict.dtd; xml:lang=en