Re: wicket migrating getConverter to 1.5

2011-11-28 Thread vineet semwal
public final C IConverterC getConverter(ClassC clazz) { if (Date.class.isAssignableFrom(clazz)) { return (IConverterC)converter; // cast } else { return super.getConverter(clazz); } } On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote: Hi

Re: Cutomizing Default AutoComplete

2011-11-28 Thread yesotaso
I've decided that Panel descendant below autocomplete is redundant. So I've added an extra o.a.w.a.AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior to handle onselect event, so far so good. -- View this message in context:

Re: wicket migrating getConverter to 1.5

2011-11-28 Thread Martin Grigorov
:-) We have different understanding of what is user code ... I mean that you do that once in the component (e.g. DateTextField) and then you can do: Date asDate = dateField.getConverter(Date.class).convertToObject(..., locale) Calendar asCalendar =

Re: wicket migrating getConverter to 1.5

2011-11-28 Thread vineet semwal
martin, i actually know what you are referring to user code and library code :) i am not saying dont do that cast,just saying it can be hidden from a wicket user, wicket user will just override the new method which will have formcomponent generic type,the getconverter(*) method will call the new

Re: wicket migrating getConverter to 1.5

2011-11-28 Thread kamiseq
;] hehe yep this is a little misunderstatement ;] from that point this is ok. well as vineet said it is small gain but it will be less confusing for coders. (we are just discussing, right?? no hard feelings ;]) what about locator issue I pointed out?? pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński

Re: intercept client request

2011-11-28 Thread James Carman
Too bad it's a nice feature On Nov 28, 2011 2:16 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 4:31 AM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: Or use a request cycle listener to be more portable. request cycle listeners are available since Wicket 1.5

Re: Dynamic component?

2011-11-28 Thread Fabiosakiyam
Thanks, using only 1 id for my panels worked. I tried this before, but i wasnt using panels (containers instead). -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Dynamic-component-tp4107323p4115163.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Wicket error we are seeing, timeout issues?

2011-11-28 Thread Brown, Berlin [GCG-PFS]
I had one question about an issue we are having with our wicket applications and was wondering if anyone else has seen something similar with other wicket apps. -- 1. Here is the exception/error we are seeing: -- [11/22/11 8:17:37:683 EST] 0119 SRTServletReq E SRVE0133E:

Re: Handling ReplaceHandlerException on continueToOriginalDestination in wicket 1.5

2011-11-28 Thread peakmop
Tor Iver is correct, in 1.4.x the call to continueToOriginalDestination didn't throw an exception but rather a boolean result. While in 1.5.x it still returns a boolean result, but it does so if replaceAllRequestHandlers() call returns without throwing an exception. My question is twofold: is

Re: AjaxRequestTarget on page open

2011-11-28 Thread robert.mcguinness
you don't need ajax for this: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Modal+Windows Opening a modal window on page load (no AJAX involved) -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/AjaxRequestTarget-on-page-open-tp4110093p4115584.html Sent from

Regarding Reset

2011-11-28 Thread ridaa
Hi All, Please suggest me 1.how do i use reset in java code.I have just declare a reset button in my html which is working as expected but wana know is there any other alternative of doin it. 2.I am unable to use generics in my app,it shows error as this is supported in 1.5 version.What do i need

How to set DropDown to only available choices (No Blank, No Choose One)?

2011-11-28 Thread eugenebalt
Easy question, but I forgot the answer. I need my DropDown to 1) ONLY list the choices I have in my model (no blank, no 'Choose One'), 2) Automatically default to the 1st choice, so there is no blank visible. If I do setNullValid(false) I see Choose One which is incorrect. I should see the 1st

Re: Wicket error we are seeing, timeout issues?

2011-11-28 Thread Igor Vaynberg
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Brown, Berlin [GCG-PFS] berlin.br...@primerica.com wrote: I had one question about an issue we are having with our wicket applications and was wondering if anyone else has seen something similar with other wicket apps. -- 1. Here is the

Re: How to set DropDown to only available choices (No Blank, No Choose One)?

2011-11-28 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi, The javadocs says: If set to false, then Choose One will be displayed when the value is null. After a value is * selected, and that change is propagated to the underlying model, the user will no longer see * the Choose One option, and there will be no way to reselect null as

Re: DropdownChoice with ChoiceRenderer does not use idValue for setting Model

2011-11-28 Thread Sven Meier
Hi Philipp, DropDownChoice is supposed to work exactly as you described it, nothing wrong there. If you want to have it the other way around, you have to provide ids in your choices model and use the ChoiceRenderer to display readable strings. Hope this helps Sven Am 28.11.2011 17:41,

Re: How to set DropDown to only available choices (No Blank, No Choose One)?

2011-11-28 Thread eugenebalt
Yes, working. Thanks -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/How-to-set-DropDown-to-only-available-choices-No-Blank-No-Choose-One-tp4115842p4115957.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Using multiple AjaxFormChoiceComponentUpdatingBehavior in a Panel

2011-11-28 Thread Adam Gray
I'm using the latest 1.4 release and it seems like there is an issue where two AjaxFormChoiceComponentUpdatingBehavior will not work correctly. The first one will function properly but the second one does nothing. We've looked for a resolution to this, but have thusfar come up empty. Is there a

Re: DropdownChoice with ChoiceRenderer does not use idValue for setting Model

2011-11-28 Thread Philipp Schreiber
Ok. Now im holding a map, using its keys as choices and a choicerenderer gives the values for rendering.. its working... nice Thanks! -- View this message in context:

Re: AW: Dynamically choosing component to add

2011-11-28 Thread tech7
I have tried this example so it is working perfect :) Thank you for your support. - Wicket-Java -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Dynamically-choosing-component-to-add-tp3955869p4116037.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at

Re: Using multiple AjaxFormChoiceComponentUpdatingBehavior in a Panel

2011-11-28 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi, What exactly is the problem ? On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Adam Gray adam.j.g...@gmail.com wrote: I'm using the latest 1.4 release and it seems like there is an issue where two AjaxFormChoiceComponentUpdatingBehavior will not work correctly.  The first one will function properly but

Re: AW: Dynamically choosing component to add

2011-11-28 Thread Bertrand Guay-Paquet
Hi, I think I just responded to you in your own thread - where I didn't know what you were trying to do. I still don't claim to fully understand, but I think I better understand your question here. If you mean that you have one panel that *may possibly contain any one of X panels*, then here's

Re: Using multiple AjaxFormChoiceComponentUpdatingBehavior in a Panel

2011-11-28 Thread Adam Gray
In a nutshell, we have two radio groups in a panel. We are adding an AjaxFormChoiceComponentUpdatingBehavior to each one in order to provide different components based on the selection. Whichever one is added in the component hierarchy first will get its proper callback. The other behavior does

Re: Handling ReplaceHandlerException on continueToOriginalDestination in wicket 1.5

2011-11-28 Thread Igor Vaynberg
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4269 -igor On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:47 AM, peakmop peak...@yahoo.com wrote: Tor Iver is correct, in 1.4.x the call to continueToOriginalDestination didn't throw an exception but rather a boolean result. While in 1.5.x it still returns a boolean

Re: Using multiple AjaxFormChoiceComponentUpdatingBehavior in a Panel

2011-11-28 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi, Create a quickstart application and attach it to a ticket in Jira On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Adam Gray adam.j.g...@gmail.com wrote: In a nutshell, we have two radio groups in a panel.  We are adding an AjaxFormChoiceComponentUpdatingBehavior to each one in order to provide different

Re: Using multiple AjaxFormChoiceComponentUpdatingBehavior in a Panel

2011-11-28 Thread Adam Gray
I'll get one created in the next couple hours. Thanks. On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.orgwrote: Hi, Create a quickstart application and attach it to a ticket in Jira On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Adam Gray adam.j.g...@gmail.com wrote: In a nutshell,

maven dependency at http://wicket.apache.org/start/download.html

2011-11-28 Thread Cemal Bayramoglu
at http://wicket.apache.org/start/download.html should the artifactId not be wicket-core for 1.5.x? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: maven dependency at http://wicket.apache.org/start/download.html

2011-11-28 Thread Martin Grigorov
I'll fix it. On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Cemal Bayramoglu jweekend_for...@cabouge.com wrote: at http://wicket.apache.org/start/download.html should the artifactId not be wicket-core for 1.5.x? - To unsubscribe,

Re: maven dependency at http://wicket.apache.org/start/download.html

2011-11-28 Thread Martin Grigorov
Fixed with r1207523. Should be picked up soon. On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote: I'll fix it. On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Cemal Bayramoglu jweekend_for...@cabouge.com wrote: at http://wicket.apache.org/start/download.html should the artifactId

Re: BookmarkablePageLink to an existing instance of a page?

2011-11-28 Thread Martijn Dashorst
Then the page is no longer bookmarkable, since you depend on state. page.getClass() will work though. Martijn On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 9:27 PM, eugenebalt eugeneb...@yahoo.com wrote: When you create a BookmarkablePageLink, you can set as its target the class of your page. But what if you

Re: BookmarkablePageLink to an existing instance of a page?

2011-11-28 Thread eugenebalt
How about a regular link, can it be constructed with an existing page instance? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/BookmarkablePageLink-to-an-existing-instance-of-a-page-tp4116739p4116770.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: BookmarkablePageLink to an existing instance of a page?

2011-11-28 Thread Adam Gray
You mean something like: add(new Link(theLink) { @Override public void onClick() { setResponsePage(yourPageInstance); } }); On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote: Then the page is no longer bookmarkable, since you depend on state.

Re: How to set a common HTTP Header on all Responses?

2011-11-28 Thread jcgarciam
What about using a filter in front of your Wicket application On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Sven Ludwig [via Apache Wicket] ml-node+s1842946n4115751...@n4.nabble.com wrote: Hello, is there a way to set a common HTTP Header on all Responses of a Wicket 1.4.19 Application which returns

Re: How to set a common HTTP Header on all Responses?

2011-11-28 Thread Jeremy Thomerson
I can't find the original message you replied to anywhere in my email. Perhaps because it is from Nabble? I think posting to the list from Nabble is blocked. Anyway, how about a custom subclass of WebResponse? Application creates it for every response. PS - Sent from a tablet. Please excuse

Re: AjaxRequestTarget on page open

2011-11-28 Thread Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
Should that simple extension be part of the framework? IMHO yes, as from time to time people ask for such functionality. Regards, Ernesto On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 4:28 PM, robert.mcguinness robert.mcguinness@gmail.com wrote: you don't need ajax for this: