Re: Model problem with my own component
Hi,
> add(new ProductImage("image", getDefaultModel());
this line is causing the null product.
> I thought when setting the default model all the children are visited
and model updated.?
No, not at all. Either you have to do that by yourself or you have to
give ProductImage a more intelligent model:
add(new ProductImage("image", new AbstractReadOnlyModel() {
public Product getObject() {
return getDefaultModel().getObject();
}
});
Hope this helps
Sven
Am 11.01.2012 08:01, schrieb Wayne W:
Hello,
I cannot get my component model to update correctly when being set. I
have list of products and when I click on the name via ajax I update a
Product panel to display the info. In that panel I have my component
that displays the image of the product. sudo code:
ProductPanel(id, IModel model) {
super(id, new CompoundPropertyModel(model));
add(new Label("name");
add(new ProductImage("image", getDefaultModel());
}
ProductImage extends Image {
ProductImage(id, IModel model) {
super( id, model);
Product p = getDefaultModelObject();
// p always null
}
AjaxLink() {
onclick(target) {
productPanel.setDefaultModel(getModel());
target.add(productPanel);
}}
When I click on the link the name is updated and displayed correctly.
However in the ProductImage component the product is always null. I
thought when setting the default model all the children are visited
and model updated.? I;ve tried debugging but get cannot figure it out.
Any ideas?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Model problem with my own component
Hello,
I cannot get my component model to update correctly when being set. I
have list of products and when I click on the name via ajax I update a
Product panel to display the info. In that panel I have my component
that displays the image of the product. sudo code:
ProductPanel(id, IModel model) {
super(id, new CompoundPropertyModel(model));
add(new Label("name");
add(new ProductImage("image", getDefaultModel());
}
ProductImage extends Image {
ProductImage(id, IModel model) {
super( id, model);
Product p = getDefaultModelObject();
// p always null
}
AjaxLink() {
onclick(target) {
productPanel.setDefaultModel(getModel());
target.add(productPanel);
}}
When I click on the link the name is updated and displayed correctly.
However in the ProductImage component the product is always null. I
thought when setting the default model all the children are visited
and model updated.? I;ve tried debugging but get cannot figure it out.
Any ideas?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: PropertyModel with x.y as property name (from a properties file)
or don't use cpm
On Jan 10, 2012 11:10 AM, "Sven Meier" wrote:
> Write you own model:
>
> public class PropertiesModel extends AbstractReadOnlyModel {
>
> private Properties properties;
>
> private String key;
>
> // constructor ...
>
> public String getObject() {
>return properties.get(key);
> }
> }
>
> You can implement IComponentInheritedModel if you want to have the same
> magic supported by CompoundPropertyModel, e.g.:
>
> Form form = new Form("form", new MyPropertiesModel(properties))**;
> form.add(new TextField("body.**background-color"));
>
> Hope this helps
> Sven
>
> Am 10.01.2012 15:44, schrieb Decebal Suiu:
>
>> Hello
>>
>> I have a form with new CompoundPropertyModel<**ValueMap>(properties) as
>> model
>> where properties are loaded from a properties file (legacy). My problem is
>> that in properties file I have keys like x.y
>> and I cannot use form.add(new TextField("body.**
>> background-color"));
>>
>> How do I solve this problem?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Decebal
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.**
>> n4.nabble.com/PropertyModel-**with-x-y-as-property-name-**
>> from-a-properties-file-**tp4282146p4282146.html
>> Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>> --**--**-
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> --**--**-
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>
Re: signOut and port
Yea, I was already doing all that. The issue was the :8443 in the url, which is accurate but bothersome since we are trying to hide that with iptables. Fixed it by throwing a RedirectToUrlException with the port number left out of the url. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/signOut-and-port-tp4254767p4284021.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: AJAX upload in modal window hangs when file size is too large @L
I just compared HTTP traces between AJAX-uploading a small file and large file and noticed that in both cases the same POST call is made from the client. However, with small file upload POST result returns quickly with status 200 and with large file the POST call never returns. When I pause my debugging session I can see that the code is blocking in WebResponse#write(AppendingStringBuffer asb). Why would the AJAX-upload POST hang? Thanks, Alec On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Alec Swan wrote: > Correct, the client does not complete even though my server code > execution finishes. > > There are no Javascript errors. It is possible that the info window is > not a part of the DOM but I don't know how to verify that. > > The problem is caused by adding a component from the parent page to > ART during AJAX upload. And it's only broken in a modal window during > very large uploads! > > I enabled Wicket debug logging and noticed different messages logged > during upload from modal window and regular page. Here is the first > line that is different: > Modal: org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer - Add _header_ to [Page class > = MyPage, id = 3, version = 0, ajax = 2] > Page: org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer - Add _header_ to [Page class > = MyPage, id = 4, version = 0] > > Does "ajax = 2" have any significance here? > > Thanks, > > Alec > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Doug Leeper wrote: >> I am assuming what you mean by hanging is that the call on the client browser >> doesn't complete or is interrupted for some reason. The hanging is not >> occurring on the server side...correct? >> >> Are there any javascript errors? I ask b/c you indicated: >> >> "INFO: Invoking pre-call handler(s)..." and before "INFO: Response parsed. >> Now invoking steps...". >> >> Could be that the info window is not there in the DOM any more? >> >> Not that these are answers but steps I would like to solving this problem. >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/AJAX-upload-in-modal-window-hangs-when-file-size-is-too-large-L-tp4276504p4282736.html >> Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
redirecting, cookies, render mode and testing
hej,
maybe Im still confusing basics concepts but this is quite new stuff.
recently I had few problems with redirecting after setting cookies (my
application was setup to use render-to-buffer default strategy).
simple setResponsePage is not good enough as cookies are lost then I
was advised to use ReplaceHandlerException and rewrite response
actions (like setting cookies) from response to original response.
private void rewriteResponseActions()
{
final RequestCycle cycle = RequestCycle.get();
Response response = cycle.getResponse();
Response originalResponse = cycle.getOriginalResponse();
//it only makes sense for IMetaDataBufferingWebResponse
//in tests originalResponse is same as response
if (originalResponse != response && response instanceof
IMetaDataBufferingWebResponse)
{
IMetaDataBufferingWebResponse bufferingWebResponse =
(IMetaDataBufferingWebResponse) response;
bufferingWebResponse.writeMetaData((WebResponse) originalResponse);
}
}
this works fine, redirect is not scheduled and is immediately performed.
there is one but however!
setting my application to use one-pass-render strategy breaks url
rendering. the app is redirected correctly but url is as it was before
redirecting.
I was investigating that and it seems it is because in
WebPageRenderer#respond(RequestCycle requestCycle) currentUrl (the one
from before redirection) is used instead of targetUrl (the one where
we want redirect to)
if (isOnePassRender() && isAjax == false && getRedirectPolicy() !=
RedirectPolicy.ALWAYS_REDIRECT)
then
BufferedWebResponse response = renderPage(currentUrl, requestCycle);
// but new requestHandler (the one from replace handler exception) is
used
now probably I should pass ALWAYS_REDIRECT instead of AUTO_REDIRECT to
just created ReplaceHandlerException and it would fix all my problems
but I didnt.
I decided that I will go back to setResponsePage and reuse
rewiriteResponseActions just before redirection. And it all works fine
(yeah I really dont need immediate redirection), cookies are
persisted. So why this is not part of default behaviour?
the other thing is that wicket tester uses totally different logic and
it always passes my redirect tests no matter which redirection method
I choose (setResponsePage or throw ReplaceHandlerException) as
cycle.getResponse() and cycle.getOriginalResponse() returns the same
object and cookies are already there.
If this is WAD then OK but maybe it could be described better somewhere.
pozdrawiam
Paweł Kamiński
kami...@gmail.com
pkaminski@gmail.com
__
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: AJAX upload in modal window hangs when file size is too large @L
Correct, the client does not complete even though my server code execution finishes. There are no Javascript errors. It is possible that the info window is not a part of the DOM but I don't know how to verify that. The problem is caused by adding a component from the parent page to ART during AJAX upload. And it's only broken in a modal window during very large uploads! I enabled Wicket debug logging and noticed different messages logged during upload from modal window and regular page. Here is the first line that is different: Modal: org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer - Add _header_ to [Page class = MyPage, id = 3, version = 0, ajax = 2] Page: org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer - Add _header_ to [Page class = MyPage, id = 4, version = 0] Does "ajax = 2" have any significance here? Thanks, Alec On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Doug Leeper wrote: > I am assuming what you mean by hanging is that the call on the client browser > doesn't complete or is interrupted for some reason. The hanging is not > occurring on the server side...correct? > > Are there any javascript errors? I ask b/c you indicated: > > "INFO: Invoking pre-call handler(s)..." and before "INFO: Response parsed. > Now invoking steps...". > > Could be that the info window is not there in the DOM any more? > > Not that these are answers but steps I would like to solving this problem. > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/AJAX-upload-in-modal-window-hangs-when-file-size-is-too-large-L-tp4276504p4282736.html > Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: AJAX upload in modal window hangs when file size is too large @L
I am assuming what you mean by hanging is that the call on the client browser doesn't complete or is interrupted for some reason. The hanging is not occurring on the server side...correct? Are there any javascript errors? I ask b/c you indicated: "INFO: Invoking pre-call handler(s)..." and before "INFO: Response parsed. Now invoking steps...". Could be that the info window is not there in the DOM any more? Not that these are answers but steps I would like to solving this problem. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/AJAX-upload-in-modal-window-hangs-when-file-size-is-too-large-L-tp4276504p4282736.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: PropertyModel with x.y as property name (from a properties file)
Write you own model:
public class PropertiesModel extends AbstractReadOnlyModel {
private Properties properties;
private String key;
// constructor ...
public String getObject() {
return properties.get(key);
}
}
You can implement IComponentInheritedModel if you want to have the same
magic supported by CompoundPropertyModel, e.g.:
Form form = new Form("form", new MyPropertiesModel(properties));
form.add(new TextField("body.background-color"));
Hope this helps
Sven
Am 10.01.2012 15:44, schrieb Decebal Suiu:
Hello
I have a form with new CompoundPropertyModel(properties) as model
where properties are loaded from a properties file (legacy). My problem is
that in properties file I have keys like x.y
and I cannot use form.add(new TextField("body.background-color"));
How do I solve this problem?
Thanks,
Decebal
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/PropertyModel-with-x-y-as-property-name-from-a-properties-file-tp4282146p4282146.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: AJAX upload in modal window hangs when file size is too large @L
Commenting out the first line in the code below fixes the problem but
I don't understand why the fix works.
Note that get("infoFeedback") returns feedback panel of the modal
window page - and not of the upload form. The filter of the feedback
panel uses
http://www.jeremythomerson.com/blog/2011/01/catching-all-feedback-messages-that-arent-rendered-by-other-feedback-panels/
approach to filter out messages of child feedback panels that have
already been rendered.
Button uploadButton = new AjaxButton("uploadButton")
{
@Override
protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target, Form form) {
//target.addComponent(get("infoFeedback")); // this
causes AJAX upload to hang duing upload of file exceeding max upload
size
uploadForm.onSubmit();
}
};
Thoughts?
Thanks,
Alec
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Alec Swan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have an upload form which uploads files using AJAX.
>
> When the file size is less than maxUploadSize the form work correctly
> on the page and modal window.
>
> When file size is greater than maxUploadSize then form works correctly
> and displays an error on the page, but hangs in modal window after
> "INFO: Invoking pre-call handler(s)..." and before "INFO: Response
> parsed. Now invoking steps...".
>
> What could be the reason for AJAX upload request to hang in modal
> window when the file uploaded is too large?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alec
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Is it possible to set the session?
Martin Grigorov-4 wrote > > iframe shares the same http session with any other url in the app > > That's right.It works fine on normal cases. But if I set " Block sites > from setting any data" and "Block third-party cookies from being set" when > it opens the iframe it creates a new session, finding the old one null. So > I loose all the informations put on session. > -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-set-the-session-tp4281720p4282292.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Is it possible to set the session?
iframe shares the same http session with any other url in the app o.a.w.Session#bind() will create a new http session if it is not already created. So create it as soon as you need it and from there on all requests will share the same http session On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 5:22 PM, cosmindumy wrote: > > See Session.bind(). Call it before as soon as the http session should > be created. > > Can you explain a little more what did you mean? > I tried mySession.bind in method newSession() from MyWebApplication. I don't > know if that's what you mean. > I'm interested to know if it's possible to pass my application session to > the iframe. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-set-the-session-tp4281720p4282241.html > Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Is it possible to set the session?
See Session.bind(). Call it before as soon as the http session should be created. Can you explain a little more what did you mean? I tried mySession.bind in method newSession() from MyWebApplication. I don't know if that's what you mean. I'm interested to know if it's possible to pass my application session to the iframe. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-set-the-session-tp4281720p4282241.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
PropertyModel with x.y as property name (from a properties file)
Hello
I have a form with new CompoundPropertyModel(properties) as model
where properties are loaded from a properties file (legacy). My problem is
that in properties file I have keys like x.y
and I cannot use form.add(new TextField("body.background-color"));
How do I solve this problem?
Thanks,
Decebal
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/PropertyModel-with-x-y-as-property-name-from-a-properties-file-tp4282146p4282146.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Force fallback on links possible ?
Fix the wiki page too ;-) It's community based! On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 2:44 PM, armandoxxx wrote: > fixed it ... > > had wrong method signature ... > should have been: > public CharSequence decorateScript(final Component theComponent, final > CharSequence theScript) > > > regards > > Armando > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Force-fallback-on-links-possible-tp4281533p4281856.html > Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Force fallback on links possible ?
fixed it ... had wrong method signature ... should have been: public CharSequence decorateScript(final Component theComponent, final CharSequence theScript) regards Armando -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Force-fallback-on-links-possible-tp4281533p4281856.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Force fallback on links possible ?
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 1:53 PM, armandoxxx wrote:
> Repost without raw tags ...
>
> I tried your suggestion and it's not working ... can you check please ?
>
> my link
>
>
>
> AjaxFallbackLink
> link = new AjaxFallbackLink("link", new
> Model(dateOption)) {
> @Override
> public void onClick(final AjaxRequestTarget theTarget) {
> /* some action */
> }
>
> @Override
> protected IAjaxCallDecorator getAjaxCallDecorator() {
> return new AjaxCallDecorator() {
> public CharSequence decorateScript(CharSequence
> script) {
> return "return true;";
> }
> };
> }
>
> };
This looks OK. I think it should work.
>
>
>
> and rendered link output
>
> tag a
> id="link580"
>
> href="analytics?5-1.ILinkListener-htmlBody-filtersWrapper-filterCollectionPanel-dateFilter-contentWrapper-dateForm-dates-3-link"
> onclick="var
> wcall=wicketAjaxGet('analytics?5-1.IBehaviorListener.0-htmlBody-filtersWrapper-filterCollectionPanel-dateFilter-contentWrapper-dateForm-dates-3-link',function()
> { }.bind(this),function() { }.bind(this), function() {return
> Wicket.$('link580') != null;}.bind(this));return !wcall;">
> my text
> close tag a
>
> onClick attribute was not replaced "decorated"
>
> what am I doing wrong ?
>
> the sample i looked on how to do it ... (taken from wiki)
>
> new AjaxLink("link") {
> protected onClick(AjaxRequestTarget target) { ...}
> protected IAjaxCallDecorator getAjaxCallDecorator() {
> return new AjaxCallDecorator() {
> public CharSequence decorateScript(CharSequence script) {
> return "alert('This is my javascript call'); " + script;
> }
> }
> }
> }
>
>
> regards
>
> Armando
> PS: can you read this ?
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Force-fallback-on-links-possible-tp4281533p4281770.html
> Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
--
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Force fallback on links possible ?
Repost without raw tags ...
I tried your suggestion and it's not working ... can you check please ?
my link
AjaxFallbackLink
link= new AjaxFallbackLink("link", new
Model(dateOption)) {
@Override
public void onClick(final AjaxRequestTarget theTarget) {
/* some action */
}
@Override
protected IAjaxCallDecorator getAjaxCallDecorator() {
return new AjaxCallDecorator() {
public CharSequence decorateScript(CharSequence script)
{
return "return true;";
}
};
}
};
and rendered link output
tag a
id="link580"
href="analytics?5-1.ILinkListener-htmlBody-filtersWrapper-filterCollectionPanel-dateFilter-contentWrapper-dateForm-dates-3-link"
onclick="var
wcall=wicketAjaxGet('analytics?5-1.IBehaviorListener.0-htmlBody-filtersWrapper-filterCollectionPanel-dateFilter-contentWrapper-dateForm-dates-3-link',function()
{ }.bind(this),function() { }.bind(this), function() {return
Wicket.$('link580') != null;}.bind(this));return !wcall;">
my text
close tag a
onClick attribute was not replaced "decorated"
what am I doing wrong ?
the sample i looked on how to do it ... (taken from wiki)
new AjaxLink("link") {
protected onClick(AjaxRequestTarget target) { ...}
protected IAjaxCallDecorator getAjaxCallDecorator() {
return new AjaxCallDecorator() {
public CharSequence decorateScript(CharSequence script) {
return "alert('This is my javascript call'); " + script;
}
}
}
}
regards
Armando
PS: can you read this ?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Force-fallback-on-links-possible-tp4281533p4281770.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Is it possible to set the session?
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 1:07 PM, cosmindumy wrote:
> Hello,
> I have 2 questions:
> 1. I have the situation that if the user press a button an iframe is open.
> The problem is that if the user has some settings in browser, the session is
> lost. It creates a new session. Is it possible to set the session to iframe?
See Session.bind(). Call it before as soon as the http session should
be created.
>
> 2. I've got an error on production server and I cannot reproduce on my
> development machine. The error says :
> woUploadFilesContainer:calculateButton
> (path=inputForm:stepTwoUploadFilesContainer:calculateButton) is not visible
> org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: Submit Button
> stepTwoUploadFilesContainer:calculateButton
> (path=inputForm:stepTwoUploadFilesContainer:calculateButton) is not visible
>
> Which can be the cause? The submit button is never hidden, but the container
> that holds it.
Check that any of its parents is not hidden at some point.
> I suppose that this is the code where it enters from Form class from wicket
> sources :
> if (!component.isVisibleInHierarchy())
> {
> throw new
> WicketRuntimeException("Submit Button " +
>
> submittingComponent.getInputName() + " (path=" +
>
> component.getPageRelativePath() + ") is not visible");
> }
>
> Has anyone any idea?
> Thanks!
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-set-the-session-tp4281720p4281720.html
> Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
--
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Custom CSS-Class for OrderByLink (possible?)
Got what I want, but had to give up this approach :( Instead of adding more css-classes, I just added a label to the HeadersToolbar, to switch the ordering state via css background-image and doing my checks for grouptotals in HeadersToolbar.onConfigure() where an sumup-symbol is added as the new labels DataModelObject. - Never forget your umbrella ! In case You did, try to find a shelter ;) -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Custom-CSS-Class-for-OrderByLink-possible-tp4268604p4281731.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Force fallback on links possible ?
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 12:53 PM, armandoxxx wrote: > I tried your suggestion and it's not working ... can you check please ? > > my link > > > and rendered link output > > onClick attribute was not replaced "decorated" > > what am I doing wrong ? Nothing to read above... > > the sample i looked on how to do it ... (taken from wiki) > > > > regards > > Armando > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Force-fallback-on-links-possible-tp4281533p4281686.html > Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Is it possible to set the session?
Hello,
I have 2 questions:
1. I have the situation that if the user press a button an iframe is open.
The problem is that if the user has some settings in browser, the session is
lost. It creates a new session. Is it possible to set the session to iframe?
2. I've got an error on production server and I cannot reproduce on my
development machine. The error says :
woUploadFilesContainer:calculateButton
(path=inputForm:stepTwoUploadFilesContainer:calculateButton) is not visible
org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: Submit Button
stepTwoUploadFilesContainer:calculateButton
(path=inputForm:stepTwoUploadFilesContainer:calculateButton) is not visible
Which can be the cause? The submit button is never hidden, but the container
that holds it.
I suppose that this is the code where it enters from Form class from wicket
sources :
if (!component.isVisibleInHierarchy())
{
throw new
WicketRuntimeException("Submit Button " +
submittingComponent.getInputName() + " (path=" +
component.getPageRelativePath() + ") is not visible");
}
Has anyone any idea?
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-set-the-session-tp4281720p4281720.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Force fallback on links possible ?
I tried your suggestion and it's not working ... can you check please ? my link and rendered link output onClick attribute was not replaced "decorated" what am I doing wrong ? the sample i looked on how to do it ... (taken from wiki) regards Armando -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Force-fallback-on-links-possible-tp4281533p4281686.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Force fallback on links possible ?
Thank you for your reply ! Regards Armando -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Force-fallback-on-links-possible-tp4281533p4281633.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Force fallback on links possible ?
thank you for your reply ... regards Armando -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Force-fallback-on-links-possible-tp4281533p4281629.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Force fallback on links possible ?
Use IAjaxCallDecorator that checks the browser version and if IE8 then returns just "true" ignoring the Ajax callback script generated by Wicket. This will fallback to non-ajax request. On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:24 AM, armandoxxx wrote: > Hey > > Can I force AjaxFallbackLinks not to use ajax when i want it so ? > > The cause for my question is IE8 .. it takes shit loads of time to replace > DOM nodes on ajax and application has a lof of panels to replace .. > > Kind regards > > Armando > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Force-fallback-on-links-possible-tp4281533p4281533.html > Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Force fallback on links possible ?
if(client.isIe(8)) {
add(new Link(){});
}
else {
add(new AjaxFallbackLink(){});
}
or you could call setResponsePage(getPage()) in the onclick of the
AFL, which will do a round trip.
or you could create your own AFL that checks for IE-ness, and doesn't
render the ajax actions all together.
Martijn
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:24 AM, armandoxxx wrote:
> Hey
>
> Can I force AjaxFallbackLinks not to use ajax when i want it so ?
>
> The cause for my question is IE8 .. it takes shit loads of time to replace
> DOM nodes on ajax and application has a lof of panels to replace ..
>
> Kind regards
>
> Armando
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Force-fallback-on-links-possible-tp4281533p4281533.html
> Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
--
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: Problem with relative URLs
I've just submitted a JIRA issue with quickstart for this issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4330 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Force fallback on links possible ?
Hey Can I force AjaxFallbackLinks not to use ajax when i want it so ? The cause for my question is IE8 .. it takes shit loads of time to replace DOM nodes on ajax and application has a lof of panels to replace .. Kind regards Armando -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Force-fallback-on-links-possible-tp4281533p4281533.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: Problem with relative URLs
The problem is related to non standard (i.e. "wicket") namespaces. In my quickstart if I change the namespace in all markup from "wicket" to "foobar" then the BPL which has only the last segment differing from the current page ends up producing an incorrect link to another page in the same path. i.e. Browser is at this page: http://127.0.0.1/content/other/o/1234/aspect/fred Here's a relative link to another page in the same 'path' jane A link to the current page fred The above BPL href of ../../../../../jane is wrong. With 'wicket' set as the namespace the 'jane' BPL outputs 'jane' which is correct. This same code worked with the non standard namespace under 1.4.x - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: Problem with relative URLs
>> Am I right in saying that RelativepathPrefixHandler should never even be >> applied to BookmarkablePageLink tags (and any classes derived from >> BookmarkablePageLink)? > >At least its source doesn't indicate that BPL should be treated specially. I've made some inroads: I got a quickstart to fail by changing the namespace in the markup like in the real app. Maybe I haven't set up the namespace correctly which worked ok in 1.4 but raises problems in 1.5 or maybe there's some wicket code that ignores the current markup's namespace and checks for "wicket". - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Problem with relative URLs
Hi, On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Chris Colman wrote: > I can't seem to get a Quickstart that reproduces the problem - even > though I've duplicated virtually every intricacy of our main app. > There's obviously something subtle that's causing the problem in our > app. > > Am I right in saying that RelativepathPrefixHandler should never even be > applied to BookmarkablePageLink tags (and any classes derived from > BookmarkablePageLink)? At least its source doesn't indicate that BPL should be treated specially. > > >>-Original Message- >>From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com] >>Sent: Tuesday, 10 January 2012 2:44 PM >>To: users@wicket.apache.org >>Subject: Re: Problem with relative URLs >> >>wicket by default always generates relative urls. this is the >>safest/easiest approach for fronting the app with a proxy, which most >>people do... >> >>-igor >> >> >>On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Chris Colman >> wrote: why is RelativePathPrefixHandler invoked on that tag? sounds a little funky... -igor >>> >>> I'm using UrlPathPageParametersEncoder for backwards compatibility > with >>> 1.5 links. I'm not sure if that could be causing the funkiness of >>> RelativePathPrefixHandler being invoked. >>> >>> Are BookmarkablePageLinks treated as absolute or relative URLs? They >>> could probably be quite safely be treated as absolute URLs because > they >>> always contain all segments from the root anyway. >>> >>> Initially I had mounted the pages without a leading slash in the > path. I >>> added the leading slash but it made no difference - I guess it could > be >>> implied. >>> >>> >>> Is there any benefit in converting a URLs like: >>> >>> /content/page/n1/v1/n2/jane to >>> >>> On a page >>> >>> /content/page/n1/v1/n2/fred to >>> >>> jane >>> >>> apart from the obvious shorter URL? >>> >>> >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>> >> >>- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: Problem with relative URLs
I can't seem to get a Quickstart that reproduces the problem - even though I've duplicated virtually every intricacy of our main app. There's obviously something subtle that's causing the problem in our app. Am I right in saying that RelativepathPrefixHandler should never even be applied to BookmarkablePageLink tags (and any classes derived from BookmarkablePageLink)? >-Original Message- >From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com] >Sent: Tuesday, 10 January 2012 2:44 PM >To: users@wicket.apache.org >Subject: Re: Problem with relative URLs > >wicket by default always generates relative urls. this is the >safest/easiest approach for fronting the app with a proxy, which most >people do... > >-igor > > >On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Chris Colman > wrote: >>>why is RelativePathPrefixHandler invoked on that tag? sounds a little >>>funky... >>> >>>-igor >> >> I'm using UrlPathPageParametersEncoder for backwards compatibility with >> 1.5 links. I'm not sure if that could be causing the funkiness of >> RelativePathPrefixHandler being invoked. >> >> Are BookmarkablePageLinks treated as absolute or relative URLs? They >> could probably be quite safely be treated as absolute URLs because they >> always contain all segments from the root anyway. >> >> Initially I had mounted the pages without a leading slash in the path. I >> added the leading slash but it made no difference - I guess it could be >> implied. >> >> >> Is there any benefit in converting a URLs like: >> >> /content/page/n1/v1/n2/jane to >> >> On a page >> >> /content/page/n1/v1/n2/fred to >> >> jane >> >> apart from the obvious shorter URL? >> >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> > >- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
