Re: howto JSON Wicket works?
Again, why do you try to generate a json object in the browser??
Why not create a normal wicket form that you post to the server and
then in the form submit method you create the json object
On 11/24/07, Pen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know how to get the postdata from the request object in wicket. I do
see the request being sent. As you see from the example I am struck there, I
don't know how to proceed further.
This is just a basic example of round trip using Json, AJax and wicket
through form submit. You get the Json data modify it update back the form.
There will be more complicated of this like grid update.
Also there can be normal form submit of Json object. In either case I don't
know how to handle on the server in wicket. I have done lot using JSP, it
looks bit different here. And no good documentation.
If you can provide some coding example or some pointer it would be great.
~Pen
Johan Compagner wrote:
Which part goes wrong?
Do you see the request being send?
Why do this though json? If you need json objects on the server why
not using a normal form post and create the json object on the
server?
2007/11/24, Pen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Greetings,
I want to know how to handle the Jquery, JSon data in the wicket. What is
the best way to do it.
I have created simple form which sends the json data across to server and
replies back to the form.
I am not sure how to handle the request and response in wicket. I am
using
Json-lib 2.1 for jdk1.5
Can anybody analyze the below program and suggest me what is wrong.
demo.html
head
script src=scripts/jquery-1.2.1.js type=text/javascript
charset=utf-8/script
script type=text/javascript charset=utf-8
$(document).ready(function() {
$(#testForm).submit(sendForm);
});
function sendForm(e) {
e.preventDefault();
var data = {
field1: $(#field1).val(),
field2: $(#field2).val(),
field3: $(#field3).val(),
};
$(#sent .content).html(data.toSource());
$.post(demo, message=[ + data.toSource() + ];,
receiveForm,
json);
};
function receiveForm(data) {
$(#field1).val(data.field1);
$(#field2).val(data.field2);
$(#field3).val(data.field3);
$(#received .content).html(data.toSource());
};
/script
/head
body
form wicket:id=testForm
h1 id=formForm/h1
label for=field1Field One:/label
input type=text id=field1 /
label for=field2Field Two:/label
input type=text id=field2 /
label for=field3Field Three:/label
input type=text id=field3 /
input type=submit id=submitter value=Post the data /
/form
div id=sent class=readout
h1 id=sent_data:Sent Data:/h1
div class=content
/div
/div
div id=received class=readout
h1 id=received_dataReceived Data:/h1
div class=content
/div
/div
/body
/html
Here is the wicket program to handle this
demo.java
public class Demo extends BasePage {
public Demo() {
Form form = new Form(testForm,new
CompoundPropertyModel(this));
add(form);
form.add(new AjaxFormSubmitBehavior(form,onsubmit){
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
Request request = getRequest();
String data = request.getParameter(data);
try {
JSONObject jsonData = new JSONObject();
JSONObject selectedNode =
jsonData.getJSONObject(data);
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new RuntimeException(Failed to
parse selected node from
reply:
+ data);
}
//target.addComponent(received)// Add to the
response data
}
});
}
}
~Pen
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/howto-JSON-Wicket-works--tf4865188.html#a13922782
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to determine absolute URL of a mounted page?
Can we then make something where we ask some setting first for the host part? If not found we generate from the current request, which i think for many many production environments will not really work because who doesnt virtualhost or puts apache in front of it? On 11/25/07, Al Maw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oliver Lieven wrote: is there a way to determine the complete, absolute URL to a mounted page (including protocol, host, port, application, filter and destination page)? I need this to be able to send a link to a Registration-Confirmation page to a user via email. Ah, yes, I've been meaning to get around to fixing that since forever, sorry. :-( See http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-609 That's pretty apalling in terms of timescales. Apologies to all involved. Will have a look before RC2, promise. ;-) In the meantime, you can go: String url = http://yourserver.com/; + RequestCycle.get().urlFor([...]).replaceAll(\\.\\./, ); Regards, Al - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Regression in 1.3.0-beta3(?)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1185 Johan Compagner wrote: please make a jira issue for this On Nov 22, 2007 9:49 PM, Johannes Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have the same problem with 1.3.0-rc1... I have tried to create a minimal example, but did not work... The problem occurres within this project: http://cedarsoft.org/wicket/yaml-integration/index.html Regards, Johannes Schneider Igor Vaynberg wrote: have you tried it with trunk? -igor On 8/31/07, Johannes Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't use any AjaxFAllbackOrderByBorder or anything else in my code. So I think there must be another trigger for the bug, too. Johannes Schneider Jonas-21 wrote: I've been able to reproduce the problem with a these few classes: http://www.nabble.com/file/p12409279/Expected_close_tag.zip Expected_close_tag.zip It seems to be caused by the problem that BorderBodyResolver warns about: Unlike OrderByBorder, AjaxFallbackOrderByBorder doesn't add the BorderBodyContainer so it fits the markup. Now, if AjaxFallbackOrderByBorder is wrapped in another Border (as in my attached example), we don't get that nice log message, instead we get that 'Expected close tag for ...' message. So, it seems https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-166 actually IS relevant for wicket 1.3.0. (Of course the fix looks now different because of the api change) cheers, Jonas igor.vaynberg wrote: hmm, if you could create a quickstart for this it would be very helpful. -igor -- Johannes Schneider Im Lindenwasen 15 72810 Gomaringen Fon +49 7072 9229972 Fax +49 7072 50 Mobil +49 178 1364488 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.johannes-schneider.info -- Johannes Schneider Im Lindenwasen 15 72810 Gomaringen Fon +49 7072 9229972 Fax +49 7072 50 Mobil +49 178 1364488 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.johannes-schneider.info -- Johannes Schneider Im Lindenwasen 15 72810 Gomaringen Fon +49 7072 9229972 Fax +49 7072 50 Mobil +49 178 1364488 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.johannes-schneider.info smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: How to determine absolute URL of a mounted page?
If you virtual host in apache on a server (local ip 10.0.0.1) so www.mydomain.com/ is virtual hosted by a tomcat server on a local network (10.0.0.2) 10.0.0.2:8080/myapp1context and you do a request to apach it will rewrite the url and give it to tomcat Then the request url is really http://10.0.0.2:8080/myapp1context/XX this pdf also explains it a bit: http://www.amitysolutions.com.au/documents/URLRewriting-technote.pdf On Nov 25, 2007 7:32 PM, Jonathan Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sounds okay, but is it really necessary? can you explain why? i always thought the browser would send the full request URL. in fact, i've had tomcat behind apache and this just works. Johan Compagner wrote: Can we then make something where we ask some setting first for the host part? If not found we generate from the current request, which i think for many many production environments will not really work because who doesnt virtualhost or puts apache in front of it? On 11/25/07, Al Maw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oliver Lieven wrote: is there a way to determine the complete, absolute URL to a mounted page (including protocol, host, port, application, filter and destination page)? I need this to be able to send a link to a Registration-Confirmation page to a user via email. Ah, yes, I've been meaning to get around to fixing that since forever, sorry. :-( See http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-609 That's pretty apalling in terms of timescales. Apologies to all involved. Will have a look before RC2, promise. ;-) In the meantime, you can go: String url = http://yourserver.com/; + RequestCycle.get().urlFor([...]).replaceAll(\\.\\./, ); Regards, Al - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/How-to-determine-absolute-URL-of-a-mounted-page--tf4864119.html#a13938331 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.comhttp://nabble.com/ . - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to determine absolute URL of a mounted page?
On 25 Nov 2007, at 13:01, Johan Compagner wrote: If you virtual host in apache on a server (local ip 10.0.0.1) it will rewrite the url and give it to tomcat Then the request url is really http://10.0.0.2:8080/myapp1context/XX I use Apache as a proxy and have got past this issue by using this directive: ProxyPreserveHost On Stops the host name being rewritten so redirects etc still work correctly. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Lightbox javascript
something like this would be nice in wicketstuff-minis ... -igor On Nov 25, 2007 5:15 AM, Uwe Schäfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi with significant help of the IRC, i did a Lightbox2-Panel-Component, that can be found here: http://www.codesmell.org/org.codesmell.wicket.lightbox thanks to the helping hands, comments appreciated. cu uwe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to determine absolute URL of a mounted page?
also the port? On Nov 25, 2007 8:47 PM, John Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 25 Nov 2007, at 13:01, Johan Compagner wrote: If you virtual host in apache on a server (local ip 10.0.0.1) it will rewrite the url and give it to tomcat Then the request url is really http://10.0.0.2:8080/myapp1context/XX I use Apache as a proxy and have got past this issue by using this directive: ProxyPreserveHost On Stops the host name being rewritten so redirects etc still work correctly. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Lightbox javascript
Igor Vaynberg schrieb: something like this would be nice in wicketstuff-minis ... i´d be glad to contribute it into wicketstuff-minis, as soon as it is mature enough. currently it lacks some features i´d like to add. expect this to be done in a few weeks. promise. cu uwe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to determine absolute URL of a mounted page?
On 25 Nov 2007, at 15:26, Johan Compagner wrote: also the port? Yes the port is also contained in the host header so it works fine - as if the proxy was not there at all. I know that Jetty always respects the host header. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to determine absolute URL of a mounted page?
Ryan Sonnek wrote: I'm trying to accomplish the same thing and think that wicket should provide such an API. all of the issues mentioned are well known issues and other web frameworks still provide an API and just acknowledge the limitations. This is pretty important for me as I can't necessarily hardcode the url when the application runs in several different environments (production vs development for example). please vote for this JIRA issue and hopefully we can get some kind of API added. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-609 I have production versus development as well; this does not preclude me from having different settings for each. There's a whole bunch of other settings which are prod/dev dependent anyhow, like database connection, admin email address (me on dev, the real application admin on prod), hibernate settings, etc... What's one more property? Personally I'd rather put it in a config file and know it's right rather than have it break if someone decides to virtual host/firewall/proxy the webapp and forgets to tweak the settings just right, (e.g., forgets the ProxyPreserveHost directive). Regards, Sebastiaan On Nov 23, 2007 7:03 PM, Oliver Lieven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Sebastiaan, thanks for your answer. Excellent point on potential problems when using clusters, firewalls and proxies (I run into those already). I also thought on providing the URLs in a configuration file/spring config, but feared there might be a simple and preferred Wicket way to determine the URLs. Thanks alot, Oliver Sebastiaan van Erk wrote: What's wrong with putting this in a configuration file or just a constant. Because in general this does not really work. For example, your web server may be behind a proxy or firewall, it may be clustered (and thus you have many machines instead of just one and they can't all have the same hostname), they may be running on a port 1024 because of security concerns, with the firewall redirecting traffic on port 80 to the webserver. Personally I use spring and generally put the hostname/port combination in a properties file which spring uses to inject it into the application class. I have different properties files for dev and production which are activated by different maven profiles. However if you really want to do this (which I don't advise) you can use the HttpServletRequest to find your information using: getWebRequestCycle().getWebRequest().getHttpServletRequest() Regards, Sebastiaan Oliver Lieven wrote: Hi, is there a way to determine the complete, absolute URL to a mounted page (including protocol, host, port, application, filter and destination page)? I need this to be able to send a link to a Registration-Confirmation page to a user via email. I searched the forum already, but didn't find a working solution. All I found were messages saying that since Wicket 1.3 all URLs are relative. Reading the JavaDoc I also found various urlFor() and getRelativePath...() methods, all returning relative paths. What I would need is a method with a signature similar to url = getAbsolutePath(Request request, Class pageClass, PageParameters parameters) which returns an url like http://localhost:8080/myapp/app/page-alias?...params... Thanks for any hints on this, Oliver -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/How-to-determine-absolute-URL-of-a-mounted-page--tf4864119.html#a13920421 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: How to determine absolute URL of a mounted page?
Personally I'd rather put it in a config file and know it's right rather than have it break if someone decides to virtual host/firewall/proxy the webapp and forgets to tweak the settings just right, (e.g., forgets the ProxyPreserveHost directive). That's why you have automated tests to make sure that someone doesn't break your configuration right? =) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Jasypt + ICrypt + ICryptFactory
Thank you for your answers. As you can see, I have already done the release.
Let's hope this is useful for someone :-)
Regards,
Daniel.
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
But the question here is... what is the real use of the ICryptFactory today
(1.3.0-rc1) in wicket? Is it only encrypting URLs? (I see
PasswordTextFields are not encrypted anymore)
Yep, I think we removed the other uses. I don't know exactly from the
top of my head, but it is in the (recent) mail archives.
And if so, would it be of real use/need? Of course, It would increase much
(as much as Java can) the security of the URLs' encryption but, would you
see any other uses?
I can't really think of anything else besides that it is available as
a nice utility class.
If this is only used for encrypting URLs, and if I am not wrong, our
WebApplication class would also need something like this:
--(CODE WHICH WOULD GO INTO OUR WebApplication CLASS)--
@Override
protected IRequestCycleProcessor newRequestCycleProcessor() {
return new WebRequestCycleProcessor() {
@Override
protected IRequestCodingStrategy newRequestCodingStrategy() {
return new CryptedUrlWebRequestCodingStrategy(new
WebRequestCodingStrategy());
}
};
}
Something like that yeah :-)
And more important: can I consider wicket's ICrypt and ICryptFactory
interfaces *stable*? (at least until a stable 1.3.0 release). Have you got
any short-term plans for changing anything in this encryption
infrastructure?
That's definitively a stable interface. I don't see us changing that
any time soon. Btw, now that we are in RC mode, we won't be changing
any of the API unless there are very pressing matters, in which case
we'll have a vote about it. The idea is to enable users to just drop
in new versions/ jars in RC/ finals without having to fix for API
changes.
So, JasyptCrypt will always throw an exception if this method is called.
Currently in wicket, setKey is only called from
org.apache.wicket.util.crypt.ClassCryptFactory, which jasypt does not
extend, so this would not pose any problems for the future, but... could it
make sense that that setKey method were called by the developer anywhere
else? this would render jasypt integration quite complicated...
I guess we'll hear if that is a problem for someone :-)
Eelco
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wicket + gwt
i noticed daniel carleton was working on wicket gwt integration, but the wiki page makes it look incomplete. has anyone gone any further on this? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/wicket-%2B-gwt-tf4872556.html#a13942831 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stateless Form
Dear all, I've made a Page with the usual Form component. The use case is users are able to enter data from this form more than once when they are still on that page. But the problem is the state of the object from that form is kept, so it looks like that user enters the same data. So I tried using StatelessForm and it worked. But is there anything I've sacrificed if I use StatelessForm? And is there any other way so the state from the form is not kept other than using StatelessForm? Thanks in advance. -- What you want today, may not exist tommorrow Blog: http://joshuajava.wordpress.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Stateless Form
If you use a stateless form then the complete page is recreated when the user does a submit, the plus is then that you never have an expired page and for you that you start fresh. But that starting fresh is only because you page is fully stateless, if you had some other none stateless thing on it (link, ajax behavior). Then you still had the same problem, because the page is reused. What you should do in that case is set the backing object/model to a new object again in the submit method. so use a compound property model on your form with a bean and set a new bean in the model On 11/26/07, Joshua Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear all, I've made a Page with the usual Form component. The use case is users are able to enter data from this form more than once when they are still on that page. But the problem is the state of the object from that form is kept, so it looks like that user enters the same data. So I tried using StatelessForm and it worked. But is there anything I've sacrificed if I use StatelessForm? And is there any other way so the state from the form is not kept other than using StatelessForm? Thanks in advance. -- What you want today, may not exist tommorrow Blog: http://joshuajava.wordpress.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
