Hi to the wicket-stuff admins bunch,
on behalf of Dan Walmsley, I'd like to ask for commit rights for him on
wicket-stuff.
He is especially interested in committing to the gmap2 project and I'd be
very happy to
welcome him to the developers group.
His sourceforge account is: goldsounds
(Let's)
Done.
Janne
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 10:09 AM, Martin Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi to the wicket-stuff admins bunch,
on behalf of Dan Walmsley, I'd like to ask for commit rights for him on
wicket-stuff.
He is especially interested in committing to the gmap2 project and I'd be
very happy
Hi, all,
I develope a repeatingview to show some information like the clock example,
updating the clock with AjaxSelfUpdatingTimerBehavior.
I want to update these information periodiacally. But it takes no effect.
Would anyone give me some hints?
Oh, that sucks. That's VERY misleading because I can override respond and I
have the AjaxRequestTarget or call AjaxRequestTarget.get() and get a valid
object. Doesn't really make much sense that a different pipeline would be
used. I guess I'll have to come up with a better solution using
thnx
2008/3/8, Janne Hietamäki [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Done.
Janne
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 10:09 AM, Martin Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi to the wicket-stuff admins bunch,
on behalf of Dan Walmsley, I'd like to ask for commit rights for him on
wicket-stuff.
He is especially
The problem is in the models of the labels. These are statically
assigned once.
fix:
protected void populateItem(Item item) {
item.setModel(new CompoundPropertyModel(item.getModel()));
ThreadInfo threadInfo=(ThreadInfo)item.getModelObject();
Is there a reason why you do not merge the two forms in one form?
Lars
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Justin Morgan - Logic Sector
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a problem that other people may have encountered. Hopefully
there's a Wicket way to solve it.
The scenario...
I have two
But maybe we should build in a hook (wicket filter or application)
where people get the current browser url, the url part that should be made
relative (or absolute)
and thn let them decided what to return there
Default impl is what we do now
johan
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 10:54 PM, Igor
Well, it'll be built into v1.1 if you need it. :) I took care of that
yesterday. It wasn't as easy as it might seem to make sure your
proxies are serializable. CGLIB didn't want to play nice. They don't
make their NoOp classes serializable for some reason. I had a little
easier time
On 3/8/08, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, it'll be built into v1.1 if you need it. :) I took care of that
yesterday. It wasn't as easy as it might seem to make sure your
proxies are serializable. CGLIB didn't want to play nice. They don't
make their NoOp
Forget the previous post
Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
Yes it was a reader/consumer I was looking for..
I'll just roll my own then..
regards Nino
Ryan Sonnek wrote:
Are you looking for how to *publish* RSS feeds, or consume them?
the wicketstuff-rome project helps with
This restricts the input field to a max length, but doesn't check the
input on the server side. To be sure the input is not longer than max
length, you should also add the length validator. You could check that
in the database layer, but somehow I find validation feedback messages
easier to
On 3/8/08, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/8/08, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, it'll be built into v1.1 if you need it. :) I took care of that
yesterday. It wasn't as easy as it might seem to make sure your
proxies are serializable.
Yes it was a reader/consumer I was looking for..
I'll just roll my own then..
regards Nino
Ryan Sonnek wrote:
Are you looking for how to *publish* RSS feeds, or consume them?
the wicketstuff-rome project helps with publishing RSS feeds from
within your application.
If you're looking to
for wicket this is a feature it really should have
now it defeats the purpose i have to make a decission in wicket which
factory i use
Then i can just as well directly compile against cglib.
I cant make the api that way that the developer has to give that factory to
use. That would be completely
On 3/8/08, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
for wicket this is a feature it really should have
now it defeats the purpose i have to make a decission in wicket which
factory i use
Then i can just as well directly compile against cglib.
I cant make the api that way that the
that does suck! why would wicket use a different pipeline??? that is
misleading!!!
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 00:21:26 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Javascript not evaluating with AbstractAutoCompleteBehavior
Oh, that sucks. That's VERY misleading
I see the JIRA, I'll go ahead and start the discussion on the dev list.
On 3/8/08, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/8/08, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
for wicket this is a feature it really should have
now it defeats the purpose i have to make a decission in wicket
You can use Wicket nested forms support for this. Just put both forms
to one common form. That way the text in both forms will be preserved
(though only the submitted one will actually be processed).
-Matej
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 10:55 AM, lars vonk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a reason
Couldn't you also do:
ProxyFactory pf = ...;
new SharedPropertyModelCustomer(pf, customer);
So, the client tells you what proxy factory implementation to use.
On 3/8/08, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see the JIRA, I'll go ahead and start the discussion on the dev list.
On 3/8/08,
no i really dont like that
then everywhere there code they need to do that, that is not an option.
and they have to program themselfs agains the proxy api. I dont want that
developers also have the learn/do that
This is something commons-proxy needs to do
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 3:29 PM, James
FYI:
you might want to check out the wicketstuff-scriptaculous auto
complete component instead.
http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Script.aculo.us+AutoCompleteBehavior
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 6:38 AM, i ii [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that does suck! why would wicket use a
and thats why it would be nice to look into that a Validator can also be a
Behavior
so that it can set the max length attribute of a text input..
johan
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This restricts the input field to a max length, but doesn't check
I created a JIRA issue for this a couple weeks back...
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1362
...but it hasn't been touched yet. Anyone else seen this problem?
Thanks,
Alex
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Any idea as to why my sort order is out of whack?
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Michael Mehrle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 2:44 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: RE: Sort order in DataView with ListDataProvider
Okay - some needed input first:
-
I'm getting that error although all my panels that are being updated
have the id set. I assume I don't have to add call setOutputMarkupId()
on any components inside of the parent panel that I am updating?
This stuff keeps happening often and is a huge timesink - wished there
was a more elegant
I'm doing a custom autocomplete and simply wanted to use
AbstractAutoCompleteBehavior to at least pass me back the search term. I
want to return a JavaScript call with the results which opens up a custom
results panel. I'm not looking to pass back HTML with the results.
I think Wicket should
Hello:
I wonder how to append a converter or java method to a component so that I
would affect what is already defined. For example, I want camelize a
TextField(or some customized subclass) so that after the converter already
defined completes the conversion (regardless what has been done in
i think a model decorator is more appropriate here
-igor
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 3:10 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello:
I wonder how to append a converter or java method to a component so that I
would affect what is already defined. For example, I want camelize a
TextField(or some
I could use both model or onSubmit to do what I mentioned.
But this resulted in repeating coding. If I put
the special conversion code in converter, it would be handily reusable
by me or others without worring about the convertion logic for each model or
form. Validator chaining is the example
a model decorator would not result in any repeated code
-igor
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 4:30 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I could use both model or onSubmit to do what I mentioned.
But this resulted in repeating coding. If I put
the special conversion code in converter, it would be handily
Hi everyone, Hi Erik,
I am sorry for so late post. But am going to go back to our
DropDownChoice discussion.
If you suggest me to create a list of integers and use a special
renderer implementation to retrieve a displayable value you should
take into account that in case if we have a
I agree. There's already a JIRA filed for this enhancement. Please
vote for this issue if you want to see it fixed! hopefully it'll make
it into 1.4?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1310
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and thats why it
33 matches
Mail list logo
