On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> create a formcomponentpanel, add a checkbox and a textfield and make
> only one of them visible.
>
Thanks.
Ian.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.or
create a formcomponentpanel, add a checkbox and a textfield and make
only one of them visible.
-igor
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Ian MacLarty wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to create a Component that behaves like a CheckBox if its
> model is a Boolean and a TextField if its model is a String.
Hello,
I'd like to create a Component that behaves like a CheckBox if its
model is a Boolean and a TextField if its model is a String. I'd like
to be able to add the component to a form with a
CompoundPropertyModel, just like you can with a CheckBox or TextField.
How would you go about creating
Is there a preferred way to pass information from a Form's AjaxButton submit
handler to a Modal window's panel's form? I am currently manually updating
individual fields on the model instance object I am assigning to the Modal
Windows > Panel > Form > FormComponents.
Since the Modal window is crea
I have a form with an AjaxFallbackButton that populates and displays a Modal
form.
It all works but when I SUBMIT the Modal form I am presented with a
Confirmation Dialog:
Are you sure you want to navigate away from this page?
Reloading this page will cause the modal window to disappear.
Press OK
I keep receiving the following:
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
users@wicket.apache.org
Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was
Jonathan,
If parameter handling is easy to do this in Jersey, then that is
probably better then Restlet (well v1.x at least). I found that the hard
part of Restlet. Working with all kinds of resource types is very
powerfull in Restlet.
Regards,
Erik.
Jonathan Locke wrote:
well, i'd be
> We've got a guy at work that swears by emacs and refuses to use
> anything else. Of course, he's the slowest guy on the project team
> and he never gets anything done.
Hehe if you generate say getters and setters for 20 fields with an
IDE, or type them all out instead - you have to type extreme
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Martijn Reuvers
wrote:
> What's wrong with using notepad or vi? Never such issues with them. :P
>
We've got a guy at work that swears by emacs and refuses to use
anything else. Of course, he's the slowest guy on the project team
and he never gets anything done.
What's wrong with using notepad or vi? Never such issues with them. :P
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 5:26 PM, James Carman
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Gwyn Evans wrote:
>>
>> Yes - use IDEA! :-)
>
> +1! (I can hear the sound of a can of worms opening)
---
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Gwyn Evans wrote:
>
> Yes - use IDEA! :-)
+1! (I can hear the sound of a can of worms opening)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 04:21:13PM +0100, Gwyn Evans wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 3:42 PM, John Krasnay wrote:
> > FYI to anyone who's been bitten by this, there's a simple workaround.
>
> Yes - use IDEA! :-)
>
What, haven't they "fixed" the maven-idea-plugin yet? Your time's
comin', pal! :
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 3:42 PM, John Krasnay wrote:
> FYI to anyone who's been bitten by this, there's a simple workaround.
Yes - use IDEA! :-)
/Gwyn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional
FYI to anyone who's been bitten by this, there's a simple workaround.
Just add the following to your pom.xml:
maven-eclipse-plugin
2.5.1
We did it in our parent POM and it's working fine.
jk
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 09:54:36AM -0400, Brill Pappin wro
*sigh*
I was referring to the suggestion that there be an option in the
archetype, and the disparaging thread that ensued.
However, I don't want to argue about this *again*.
...never mind...
- Brill
On 3-Apr-09, at 9:56 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Brill Pap
I think thats a good position.
I can't image that it was purposely done in order to enforce the maven
way, there are just too many people who would have broken builds.
- Brill
On 2-Apr-09, at 3:53 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
i just want to say one quick thing about this.
there are two great
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Brill Pappin wrote:
> failure to accommodate other
> resource usage patterns).
HUH?
Care to elaborate? Wicket doesn't force its patterns upon you (unlike
maven's eclipse 2.6 plugin). You are free to add your
html/properties/etc in src/main/resources without ever t
laugh
Although I think its too late to stop this thread growing, you should
all know that we just had this argument a few weeks ago!
It seems to be a touchy subject for some :)
The old thread can be found by searching for "Re: How can I share text
resources with multiple web applications?".
laugh
not again! ;)
- Brill
On 2-Apr-09, at 2:11 PM, Philippe Marschall wrote:
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Some brilliant guy thought it prudent to make the maven-eclipse-
plugin
only accept .java files from src/main/java and src/test/java in
version 2.6.
Well there's a reason these folder
Maybe I misread your post, but I thought you were saying that it
messes up where you want you meta files and forces you to use the
"maven" resource pattern?
- Brill
On 2-Apr-09, at 9:42 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Why fix something that isn't broken?
Martijn
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:36 P
There should be laws against the Internet and April 1st...
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
The Wicket PMC has discussed the following action. Because I think it
is prudent that the Wicket community keeps evolving with the state of
Java, I've created a board resolution to rename Wicket to WicketFX
(thank
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
> aaah.
>
> I take it a Page is automatically marked as a transparent resolver -- how do
No. You add components directly to the page. this.add(...) remember?
> I mark a Panel as a transparent resolver?
>
> I'll add the solution to:
> http://cw
AFAIK you should override isTransparentResolver and return true..
Ryan McKinley wrote:
aaah.
I take it a Page is automatically marked as a transparent resolver --
how do I mark a Panel as a transparent resolver?
I'll add the solution to:
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/markup-inheritance.ht
aaah.
I take it a Page is automatically marked as a transparent resolver --
how do I mark a Panel as a transparent resolver?
I'll add the solution to:
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/markup-inheritance.html
for the next guy!
On Apr 3, 2009, at 3:42 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
You don't ad
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 6:04 AM, Ista Pouss wrote:
> Second (the question), how it is possible to set the width and height
> in the html img of the graph ?
I implemented something simple for JFreeChart in an Advanced Wicket
presentation I did:
http://svn.carmanconsulting.com/public/wicket-advance
Thanks for the suggestion Martijn.
I tried return new FormComponent[0]; and got exactly the same error.
I think my use-case is quite fringe, so I have resigned myself to using the
hidden field that you previously suggested.
- Tristan
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>
> You might try to return an em
It works now. i noticed that in line 49-50 al the objonXXX vars are declared,
minus the one which is used in the offending codeblock: objonfocus. So i just
tried adding
var objonfocus;
in line 55. and it worked :) yay!
it would be nice if you coul add this in svn.
lutz
On Thursday 02 April
Hi,
I'm beguining to use JFreeChart. My tutorial is "JFreeChart and wicket
example" (http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/jfreechart-and-wicket-example.html).
That's work fine, except two things.
First, I think modestly there is a very little error : the tutorial
says "JFreeChart chart = (JFreeChart)g
Sorry no patch yet, problem popped up just yesterday, and i wanted to consult
the mailinglist first before investigating further.
lutz
On Thursday 02 April 2009 23:37:11 Johan Compagner wrote:
> I guess it would be better to fix it.
> Have to look into the code better, do you have a patch for it
LOL omg I was so fooled...! Hmm I do hope this is a joke though!
Sent from my iPhone
On 2/04/2009, at 2:38 AM, Thies Edeling wrote:
+1 but only because it's april fool's day :)
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
The Wicket PMC has discussed the following action. Because I think it
is prudent that the
You don't add the child to the right component: you have wrapped the
tag inside a markup container. You have to make the markup
container a transparent resolver, *or* add the child components to the
markup container.
Martijn
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 7:47 AM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
> I have been usi
31 matches
Mail list logo
