Hi!
I get lots of these exceptions when persumably people use our
application in produciton from bookmarks pointing to dynamic links and
their session is out.
How can this happen? The particular page requires authentiacation
which is handled via
Or is it possible that this is an OLD instance of a page (in PAGEMAP)
and it is being rendered even if user is no longer authorized??? How
can this be legal? Is it a bug or am I missing a setting somewhere?
**
Martin
2010/7/9 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com:
Hi!
I get lots
Hi All,
I have an issue with refreshing a DropDownChoice control. I would like the
dropdown to have the Choose One option aevery time I want to a particular
action like Create new account etc.
I think it is how I designed my CRUD pattern, that I have this issue. Would
like to get your
Ok, I see what you mean and I think that would work. Only I'm not so sure about
the couple of hours (have you looked at CDI BeanManager...?) and with that
approach, I would end up having 3 proxies between my Wicket component and my
EJB.
Anyway, this is probably faster to implement than waiting
I am not sure if this is related but AFAIR we faced a similar problem with
GlassFish V2.1 and determined the root cause of this to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2416
The exception stack trace may be different in V3 so I am not sure if it is
same issue.
Regards,
Kulbhushan
--
Thanks for pointing this out, however, I think it's a related but different
issue. I did not notice any classloader problems in my case, and anyway, we
deploy our entire application (web pages, EJBs and entity classes) in a single
WAR.
Regards,
Harald
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von:
I'm sort of dubious about your suggestion as I don't see any direct connection
between this DropDownChoice and TinyMCE editor from wicket-contrib-tinymce.
Would you care to explain little more about integration?
Peter
From: Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com
I'm sort of dubious about your suggestion as I don't see any direct
connection
between this DropDownChoice and TinyMCE editor from wicket-contrib-
tinymce.
I think Pedro misunderstood you and therefore posted code for changing the
Wicket style which is something else.
- Tor Iver
thank you.
2010/7/9 Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/nested/
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 9:09 PM, 蔡茂昌 caimaochang.c...@gmail.com wrote:
is there any complete sample or demo of the treeLink
thank you.
-
--
Jeremy
vov wrote:
But question is still open:)
Look to example
public static boolean visibleFlag = true;
public VisibilityButtonTest()
{
FormVoid form = new FormVoid(form);
add(form);
AjaxButton ajaxButton = new AjaxButton(button1)
{
@Override
public
Thanks for the pointers Martin.
Nope, I'm not parsing parameters manually.
I don't have paging buttons, just links that are not part of a form.
I decided to sidestep the whole issue by using the DataView and DataProvider
classes. I was hoping to do things in a more stateless way but I guess
If you want to make dataview stateless I believe you can achieve it
with some url encoding scheme... ;]
2010/7/9 Kevin Stembridge kevin.stembri...@gmail.com:
Thanks for the pointers Martin.
Nope, I'm not parsing parameters manually.
I don't have paging buttons, just links that are not part of
It can't work.
Please, see org.apache.wicket.Component.internalBeforeRender() method.
Method onBeforeRendering() colling only in case when visibility of component
is true.
In our example boolean variable 'available' false by default. This mean that
component never be rendered.
Can someone
... but keep getting stopped in the spam filters when sending confirmation.
Any trick to make it actually get through?
Med vennlig hilsen
TOR IVER WILHELMSEN
Senior systemutvikler
Arrive AS
T (+47) 48 16 06 18
E-post: toriv...@arrive.no
http://www.arrive.no
http://servicedesk.arrive.no
Hi, I misunderstood your question. I was think you are asking about session
style.
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Peter Miklosko peter_b...@yahoo.com wrote:
I'm sort of dubious about your suggestion as I don't see any direct
connection
between this DropDownChoice and TinyMCE editor from
I think you could do that like this:
TinyMCESettings settings = new TinyMCESettings();
settings.register(new Plugin(style_formats)
{
@Override
protected void definePluginSettings(StringBuffer buffer)
{
define(buffer, style_formats, [
+ {title : 'Bold text', inline : 'b'},
+ {title : 'Red text',
But a different page instance for each person or browser section is expected
by any Java developer.
What is not so much expected is that for the same person, in the same
browser session, you can't rely on natural object identity, like Martin
said, thanks to serialization... But you can rely on
The equals()/hashCode() should already work as expected for components
On Jul 9, 2010 8:28 AM, avrahamr avrah...@gmail.com wrote:
But a different page instance for each person or browser section is expected
by any Java developer.
What is not so much expected is that for the same person, in the
But changes will not propagate. You might think that you are
transferring money from account A to account B but are transferring
money from account A' to account B' so you need to consider this
when implementing.
Ofcourse it's a dumb example nobody implements such transactions in
session
I got following error from it
ERROR - Objects- Error serializing object class
com.admin.item.EditItemPage [object=[Page class = com.admin.item.EditItemPage,
id = 4, version = 0]]
org.apache.wicket.util.io.SerializableChecker$WicketNotSerializableException:
Unable to
I understand by doing the way Jeremy Thomerson suggests (onSubmit or
onClick), Wicket will not create a new page instance upon request.
But, I am experiencing this not so much expected scenario that for
the same person, in the same browser session, click the browser's
Refresh Button, or F5, a new
But, I am experiencing this not so much expected scenario that for
the same person, in the same browser session, click the browser's
Refresh Button, or F5, a new page instance is created. Is the latter
behavior expected?
For bookmarkable page URLs: Yes. Look into how versioned-setting and
you can solve this yourself by managing a Map where you put in the users in
the constructor of the page
on session expiration, you remove the user from the Map
2010/7/9 fachhoch [via Apache Wicket]
ml-node+2283204-669277367-232...@n4.nabble.comml-node%2b2283204-669277367-232...@n4.nabble.com
For session-level stuff, store the values in the session, not a
component/page instance.
On Jul 9, 2010 8:36 AM, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com
wrote:
But changes will not propagate. You might think that you are
transferring money from account A to account B but are
I have found only this link http://www.systemmobile.com/?p=249
and I will try find my Wicket in Action book for the terms you mentioned.
Any good links for explaining the versioned-setting and statefulness concepts?
Thanks
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Wilhelmsen Tor Iver toriv...@arrive.no
sounds like a bug, file a jira.
-igor
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Chris Colman
chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com wrote:
The JavaDoc for AjaxButton (and AjaxSubmitButton) says:
A button that submits the form via ajax. Since this button takes the
form as a constructor argument it does not need
avrahamr wrote:
But you can rely on object values, so if
you correctly implement hash and equals it should be fine.
I too have a problem with multiple calls to a WebPage constructor
I have a bookmarkable page, a link to which can be followed from a
verification E-mail which the app
well, i recently wrote a wicket-ioc module for seam and it took me a
couple of hours :)
-igor
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:52 AM, Harald Wellmann
harald.wellm...@multi-m.de wrote:
Ok, I see what you mean and I think that would work. Only I'm not so sure
about the couple of hours (have you looked
And Seam uses CDI/Weld, right? So your module might solve my problems... Is it
public?
Regards,
Harald
Von: Igor Vaynberg [igor.vaynb...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 9. Juli 2010 18:06
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: Serialization of
no, the module is for seam 2.1 which does not use weld.
-igor
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Harald Wellmann
harald.wellm...@multi-m.de wrote:
And Seam uses CDI/Weld, right? So your module might solve my problems... Is
it public?
Regards,
Harald
Ok. My authentication scheme was not strict enough, this fixed the problem:
/**
* @see
org.apache.wicket.authorization.strategies.page.AbstractPageAuthorizationStrategy#isActionAuthorized(org.apache.wicket.Component,
org.apache.wicket.authorization.Action)
*/
@Override
public boolean
callOnBeforeRenderIfNotVisible() ?
On 07/09/2010 12:26 PM, vov wrote:
It can't work.
Please, see org.apache.wicket.Component.internalBeforeRender() method.
Method onBeforeRendering() colling only in case when visibility of component
is true.
In our example boolean variable 'available' false by
In my case I have to refresh some pages based on some business logic,
mine is a workflow applicaiton , workflow creates tasks for user.I show
users tasks, these user task pages are implemented in wicket.
we also have some admin functionality where admin can delete the task
,supposeadmin
I have a page that has a html components like a select list and radio
buttons. And those components will invoke the onchange event to submit
the form or move to the next page.
It doesn't look like I am moving to the next page. My model values
dont' seem to be retained, at least they aren't
Hi,
public void onSelectionChanged(Object newSel) {
this.setResponsePage(TestPage.class);
}
you're telling Wicket to switch to a new instance of TestPage on each
selection change.
Just leave this method empty and Wicket will re-render the current page,
retaining the current
35 matches
Mail list logo
