even in 1.4 this can be rewritten as rc.setresponsepage(pageclass,
params), in 1.5 it is the same.
-igor
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 8:33 PM, Chris Colman
wrote:
> What should we use in 1.5 to implement this 1.4 code:
>
> getRequestCycle().setRequestTarget(new
> BookmarkablePa
Hi Wicketers,
I have a problem with inmethod-grid in IE8 as below error. This issue
cause the grid display incorrectly. Is it a bug? And how to fix it?
Webpage error details
User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
Trident/4.0; EasyBits GO v1.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR
What should we use in 1.5 to implement this 1.4 code:
getRequestCycle().setRequestTarget(new
BookmarkablePageRequestTarget(UserAccountPage.class, pageParameters));
?
Can you explain how does it work? I am thinking on going to java one
just to check this out.
-nelson
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
what version of wicket?
-igor
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Alexander Gubin wrote:
> Googled around, but no clear answer:
>
> In my app I mount a page like this:
>
> mount(new MixedParamUrlCodingStrategy("/store/product", ItemPage.class, new
> String[]{"itemId", "itemName"}));
>
> which gives
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4061 for further details.
Just thought I'd send it to the group. I guess more people are upgrading
to 1.5 right now, and this can cause applications to break in an
unexpected fashion.
When dealing with ids that start with one or more dashes (e.g.
turns out that error() and info() calls from onSubmit method send me to
the wrong path too
I appreciate any ideas on solving this
On 09/15/2011 03:08 PM, Alexander Gubin wrote:
Googled around, but no clear answer:
In my app I mount a page like this:
mount(new MixedParamUrlCodingStrategy("/
i'll be there...
-igor
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Craig Tataryn wrote:
> Hi folks, all the Basement Coders will be at JavaOne this year, and I'm
> curious if any Wicketrati will be there too? If so, lets get together and
> burn images of JSF in effigy! (or just grab a beer) :D
>
> Take
seems rather strange. quickstart would help.
-igor
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Chris Merrill wrote:
> I'm trying to understand why PageReference.getPage() would return null.
> I assume that when some criteria is met, a page can be expired from the
> cache. Are there any docs on this behavi
Hi folks, all the Basement Coders will be at JavaOne this year, and I'm curious
if any Wicketrati will be there too? If so, lets get together and burn images
of JSF in effigy! (or just grab a beer) :D
Take care,
Craig.
--
Craig Tataryn
site: http://www.basementcoders.com/
podcast: http://www.
I'm trying to understand why PageReference.getPage() would return null.
I assume that when some criteria is met, a page can be expired from the
cache. Are there any docs on this behavior?
I have a case where the onSubmit() method is setting the response page
using a PageReference to the previous p
On 9/15/2011 9:38 AM, manuelbarzi wrote:
> may you execute the query db in IDataProvider.iterator, instead of
> populateItem. see IDataProvider javadoc.
Wow...that was easy! I'm so glad I asked. You guys have thought of
everything.
I love Wicket!
Chris
--
there is an example of this in the new wicket-examples under request
mapper examples.
-igor
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Jorge Gallardo
wrote:
> Hi people,
>
> What is the best way to achieve this with Wicket 1.5? Still using the same
> approach?
>
> Thanks!
> JG
>
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at
Hi people,
What is the best way to achieve this with Wicket 1.5? Still using the same
approach?
Thanks!
JG
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 7:50 AM, Bas Gooren wrote:
> I think in wicket 1.4.x this is only possible with a custom mount point; In
> other words:
>
> Override/implement a version of bookmar
no. i thikn it should be
if (typeof(retVal)=="undefined") retVal=true;
-igor
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> return (typeOf retVal === "undefined" || retVal === true)
>
> in all other cases stop the submit
>
> looks OK ?
>
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Martin Gri
then let the default behavior happen. only convert to "true" if the
return type is undefiend.
-igor
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> Yes, sounds like a good idea.
> What if the user code returns an object ?
>
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Igor Vaynberg
> wrote:
>
return (typeOf retVal === "undefined" || retVal === true)
in all other cases stop the submit
looks OK ?
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> Yes, sounds like a good idea.
> What if the user code returns an object ?
>
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Igor Vaynberg
> wrot
Yes, sounds like a good idea.
What if the user code returns an object ?
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> i think in this case we should define the undefined to be true...
>
> -igor
>
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 5:56 AM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
>> it seems in your code you hav
"man bash", search for ulimit, see option -n
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Archana
wrote:
> I am using Apache wicket 1.4 framework to build web pages in my application,
> when ever lot of users try to access the application then am seeing lot of
> errors related to diskPageStore and too many f
search list archives for "Too many open files" or "too many file handles"
-igor
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Archana
wrote:
> I am using Apache wicket 1.4 framework to build web pages in my application,
> when ever lot of users try to access the application then am seeing lot of
> errors rel
i think in this case we should define the undefined to be true...
-igor
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 5:56 AM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> it seems in your code you have without
> returning anything. Since 'if (undefined)' is 'false' the call stops
> there.
>
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Wayne W
it seems in your code you have without
returning anything. Since 'if (undefined)' is 'false' the call stops
there.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Wayne W wrote:
> and in what case does it not return anything?
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
>> It should return tr
and in what case does it not return anything?
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> It should return true or false.
> False if there is some reason to not submit the form, for example
> client side validation failed.
> True if everything is OK and the submit can proceed.
>
>
Add your own html header and footer tags when validating,
() but don't include them when outputting the
fragment.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 6:05 AM, manuelbarzi wrote:
> sure, but you can try customizing it. inside it you can find
> interesting things like HtmlDocumentParser, which you can modify
Ah thanks for the information. I didn't look in the bug tracker.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Problem-with-stateless-login-page-after-moving-from-Wicket-1-5-RC5-1-to-1-5-0-tp3817801p3817891.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabbl
sure, but you can try customizing it. inside it you can find
interesting things like HtmlDocumentParser, which you can modify to
accomplish your needs. it works with a raw html string document, as
you may need.
.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Daniel Stoch wrote:
>
> Thanks for your suggestio
WICKET-3991
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Florian B. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I encountered a strange behavior with a stateless login page after moving
> from Wicket 1.5-RC5.1 to 1.5.0.
>
> To assure that the login page is stateless I'm using the StatelessChecker
> class. The problem occurs when the l
Hi,
I encountered a strange behavior with a stateless login page after moving
from Wicket 1.5-RC5.1 to 1.5.0.
To assure that the login page is stateless I'm using the StatelessChecker
class. The problem occurs when the login fails because the authenticate()
method of the AuthenticatedWebSession
See whether
org.apache.wicket.settings.IMarkupSettings.getMarkupFactory().newMarkupParser(IMarkupResourceStream)
will do the job for you.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Daniel Stoch wrote:
> Thanks for your suggestion. But I need to validate a fragment of HTML,
> but it seems that HtmlDocument
Thanks for your suggestion. But I need to validate a fragment of HTML,
but it seems that HtmlDocumentValidator validates only whole
documents.
>From my point of view the following texts are valid HTML fragments:
- This is sample text
- This is sample paragraph
--
Daniel
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5
It sounds like you need to make your page not versioned :
@Override
public boolean isVersioned()
{
return false;
}
This way the page will not create new versions of it when you make
changes in the component tree.
When the user presses browser back button sh
Wicket deployment on oc4j issue is fixed by changing the name space
defination in web.xml file also removed the wicket-jmx-x.x.x.jar from
classpath.
New:
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee";
xmlns:web="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/web-app_2_5
It should return true or false.
False if there is some reason to not submit the form, for example
client side validation failed.
True if everything is OK and the submit can proceed.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Wayne W wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to upgrade from 1.4.8 to 1.4.18 and I'm findin
33 matches
Mail list logo
