Committed fix to trunk and 1.3.
-Matej
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 7:10 PM, mfs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can someone take a look into thisits a blocking issue for me
>
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> mfs wrote:
>>
>> Guys,
>>
>> I am facing this issue (with Safari/IE) with the usage of AjaxLink wh
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 4:28 AM, Timo Rantalaiho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Jul 2008, Matej Knopp wrote:
>> There is one thing that helped me quite a lot when migration the
>> project I'm working out. I've created GenericPanel,
>> GenericWebMarkup
There is one thing that helped me quite a lot when migration the
project I'm working out. I've created GenericPanel,
GenericWebMarkupContainer and GenericFragment classes. In most cases
the only change was renaming Panel to GenericPanel.
I was wondering, even though those classes were farily simpl
Firefox caches the wrong version of DOM with the page. Unfortunately
the only workaround I know about is to force firefox reloading page on
backbutton by sending the no-store header. Look at WebPage#setHeaders.
-Matej
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:06 PM, Kaspar Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I
Your model is either broken or just doesn't sent the correct
notifications. You can try calling tree.invalidateAll() to make sure
it's rebuilt after you add node.
-Matej
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Kai Schubert-Altmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> how can I add nodes to a wicket tr
Any chance you can try it with latest trunk?
-Matej
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Artem D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> I've got wicket 1.4-m2 based application running on two different network
> hosts configured as Tomcat 6 Simple TCP cluster.
> I try to simulate failover with ses
DefaultAbstractTree is indeed still deprecated and will be removed in
1.5. Closest to DefaultAbstractTree in the terms of functionality
comes LinkTree, that uses LinkIconPanel as content component.
LinkIconPanel does contain node icons. Look at the LinkTree source
code, it's really short.
-Matej
. If it does it might be problem with Ajax header
contribution.
-Matej
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 1:04 AM, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mind showing us some code? The pattern you are describing here is very
> common and it should work quite well.
>
> -Matej
>
> On
Mind showing us some code? The pattern you are describing here is very
common and it should work quite well.
-Matej
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:55 AM, David Nedrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, Google is not being helpful.
>
> Is there a way to contribute CSS when a Panel is added to a page?
>
I think that should be already fixed in SVN. We didn't remove the
entries on session expiration.
-Matej
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Juha Alatalo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We are now using patched version of 1.3.X in a production environment and
> usage of memory seems to be much more stab
Apart from the fact that this would be even more verbose than current
generics approach this would probably also radically increase
component memory footprint.
-Matej
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 7:03 AM, cowwoc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Have you considered moving from subclassing to compositio
which is exactly what we are trying to avoid - having generics in Component.
-Matej
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Ricky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know if i was clear enough, sorry about that.
>
> I meant if you have something like :
>
> public Component, ID extends Serializable>{
>
Looks like you are using the old tree...
-Matej
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Dimedrol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> jwcarman wrote:
>>
>> getTreeState().expandAll()?
>>
>
> Hmmm, seems like I dont' have this procedure.
> See screenshot - http://i27.tinypic.com/30sg3t4.gif
> http://i27.tin
The decoupling doesn't have to be extremely painful. We could leave
support for the default slot in component, something like this:
class Component {
protected void setDefaultModel(IModel model);
protected IModel getDefaultModel();
}
class MyComponent extends Component {
public void setModel(
The "dots" are there for a reason. Wicket generates relative URLs.
-Matej
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Tomasz Prus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have links like this
>
>
>
> in page source. My boss wants i remove these dots.
>
> Can anyone help me ?
>
---
We should definitely discuss this after 1.4.
-Matej
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 7:30 PM, Patrick Angeles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> igor.vaynberg wrote:
>>
>> component.detach() {
>> for (field:fields) {
>> if (imodel.class.isassignablefrom(field.gettype)) {
>> ((imodel)field.get(t
I was talking about the model slot. If you don't have a model in
component it doesn't cost you anything.
-Matej
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Eelco Hillenius
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Having multiple models is rare, however, having one model that can
>> (but doesn't have to) be used is more
I don't really think this is the right discussion we should be having now :)
Maybe 1.5 would be the right release for changes like that (if they
are justified, which i'm not really convinced it is. Anyway, as I said
before, storing (single) model in component has no overhead, so I
don't really see
There are also implementation issues that need to be considered.
Currently the model is stored in a way that it doesn't take any place
when not used.
Having multiple models is rare, however, having one model that can
(but doesn't have to) be used is more common imho. Wicket is kinda
optimized for t
Hi,
it shouldn't be called twice. I'll take a look into it.
-Matej
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:36 AM, RUMikeP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Please can someone let me know if it is bug or if there is a reason why when
> paging using the inmethod data grid, two calls are made to the datasourc
You really have to use it to appreciate the benefits. Quick glance
will just be scary :)
-Matej
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 6:45 PM, Eelco Hillenius
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Question is, how many of those users actually use generified wicket on
>> day-to-day basis.
>
> Common, a quick glance and
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Jan Kriesten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> I'm not sure I like where this discussion is going. I don't see anyone
>> having any particular objections against current state.
>
> @matej_k:
>
> ugh - you should count again... if I counted right, most of the re
I'm not sure I like where this discussion is going. I don't see anyone
having any particular objections against current state. I think before
we even think of (partially) reverting generics we have to discuss
what's wrong (except the verbosity of course, but that's not something
we can really do ab
Hi,
about not removing the entries, can you please create jira issue? I
will try to look into it ASAP.
-Matej
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Stefan Fußenegger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Recently, I had 2 memory related crashes of my Wicket app. Thanks to the
> priceless -XX:+HeapDumpOnOutO
Property files are always ISO 8859-1. Try escaping the string in
property file or use eclipse plugin that does that for you. Or try xml
property files.
-Matej
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Fabien D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> I'm french and unfortunately in french we have
> Yes, that's fine as long as you're aware of the GenericLink
> alternative, but if you're not, then when you auto-complete
> L[i[n[k]]], if you use LinkGeneric, it'll show up whereas if
> GenericLink, it won't.
>
> /Gwyn
>
> On Sat, May 24, 2008
I don't buy the autocompletion as argument. Not with eclipse. It might
be difference when you do it first time and don't know the classes,
but every other time you just write GLink and eclipse autocompletes it
just fine.
-Matej
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Gwyn Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Or maybe I took it too far and GenericLink and GenericButton would suffice :)
-Matej
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 on that too, except that I'd prefer the name GenericLink.
>
> one problem though, suppose we have Gener
+1 on that too, except that I'd prefer the name GenericLink.
one problem though, suppose we have GenericWebMarkupContainer,
GenericPanel, GenericForm (maybe) etc, things like
findParent(Form.class) will no longer work, as it will have to be
findParent(GenericForm.class).
-Matej
On Sat, May 24, 2
Hi,
I don't think current wicket output is that bad, just look at what
some JSF implementation produce :)
Seriously, we might consider different approach (the one like you
suggest) for 1.5. But I don't think current wicket approach is
something that desperately needs to be fixed, though there cert
Hi,
beforeRender on behavior has different semantics than onBeforeRender
on component. I agree that this is confusing and it i think it should
be improved in 1.4.
beforeRender and afterRender can be used to render markup before
component and after component output. Currently there is no method in
Although I'm not sure how many people call getModel/getModelObject
anyway. I think it's mostly about ListItems etc an i doubt anyone
would subclass it just because of getModel/getModelObject...
-Matej
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
rmal casts are handled.
>>
>> I don't think Johan's all or nothing proposition is very pragmatic one.
>> Without generic IModel we do not get any API discoverability and our
>> APIs continue to suck. For instance, how can API user know what kind of
>> mode
Well, maybe it really is a hack that's too ugly. We might have two methods,
default getModel() that doesn't cast it and alternative convenience
one that does.
-Matej
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> class Component {
>
class Component {
private IModel model;
public IModel getModel() {
return (IModel) model;
}
}
I like this. Even with the possible class cast exception. Because
without generics, it doesn't leave you no other option than to cast it
to your model, which isn't
Hi,
first of all, I don't really think it's worth pooling pages. I can't
imagine that page instance creation would have that much overhead.
Also stateless pages doesn't mean they don't contain any state. The
page is stateless because it's not kept between requests, but during
request there's lot
setVisible is possible, but you have to call
setOutputMarkupPlaceholderTag(true) on it.
-Matej
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 6:44 PM, nitinkc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Currently the DataGrid outputs a datatable with column headers and a message
> 'No Records Found' if the datalist is empty. Does a
Unfortunately that's not how it works now. So if you have ajax
application and don't want to get weird problems on back button the
only way now is to send the no-store header.
-Matej
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i think that is more a problem of th
Mount your page using HybridUrlCodingStrategy.
-Matej
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 11:01 AM, gumnaam23 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Adding "no-store" to the "Cache-Control" header did the trick.
>
> According to Page.setHeaders() javadoc , Wicket already adds cache related
> headers
> response.setHe
Are you sure you also send the cache-control: no-store header?
(no-cache is not enough). Also for opera there's no way to force the
reload.
-Matje
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 9:40 PM, gumnaam23 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My back button, doesn't send request back to the server.
> I can see that th
Hi,
I'll look at it as soon as I get some spare time. In the meanwhile,
can you try putting the modal window in a wicket form and see if that
helps?
-Matej
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 5:23 PM, ChuckDeal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am experiencing a javascript error when closing a ModalWindow t
Grid trunk is 1.4 of course. But it's kept in sync with 1.4 trunk. Why
would Your patch basically reverses that, why would I want to apply
it? :)
-Matej
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i guess Matej wil gladly apply it for you
> Except that Matej the
I usually just use in such case.
-Matej
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Doug Donohoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm just now using 1.4. What type of thing is expected for T in WebPage ?
>
> It looks like what your model object is. But if your page doesn't use
> models (perhaps just it'
You have specified the cookie name. Thus it should remember the last
size - that takes precedence over the specified initial size.
-Matej
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Mathias P.W Nilsson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi! I can't set initial height and width on my modal window. It's always t
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> > Nop thats the best thing todo
> >
> >
> >
> > On 5/3/08, Michael Allan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Matej Knopp wrote:
> > > > Martin Makundi wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
y?
If you subclassed the Session class and your attributes are properties
of the subclass.
But you are required to call session.dirty() only if your pages are
stateless and your application is deployed on cluster.
-Matej
>
> **
> Martin
>
> 2008/5/2 Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECT
Hi,
session.dirty() should be invoked when the session object has changed,
so that wicket changes the http session attribute to make cluster
replicate the session object (assuming you're running in clustered
environment).
I think the only case when you need to call dirty() yourself is when
your a
Hi,
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 12:38 PM, richardwilko
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Im looking into clustering our wicket app and have a few questions. We are
> using jetty 6.
>
> 1) We have to use the SecondLevelCacheSessionStore (default in 1.3) for
> clustering to work correctly, is
ow load event. Lightbox doesn't work if
> lightbox.js is loaded via ajax because there is no window load event to hook
> itself up.
In that case lightbox needs to be fixed. Dynamically loaded javascript
is a common thing.
-Matej
>
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 2:15 AM, Mat
Wicket filters the contributions on client side (according to the
URL). Can you please elaborate on scriptaculous not working?
-Matej
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Matthew Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >filter out the duplicates on the client side
>
> How do you do that? Would it be po
> VOTE:
>
> [ ] IDataProvider
> [ ] Iterator> , drop model
> [X] Leave as is.
>
>
-Matej
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Of course page will be generified, it's just a matter of time that
Johan can invest in it :)
-Matej
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybes it's simple and I missed it, but why don't Page and WebPage implement
> generics? (Or maybe it's just co
The meaning of tree.updateTree(target) is to refresh changed parts of
the tree during ajax request (assuming the model fired proper
listeners).
The problem with DnD tree is that it's more complicated than just
reordering DOM entries and then notifying the server. Anyway, if you
want to make sure th
Please create a jira issue and attach a page source code that doesn't work.
-Matej
2008/4/14 Tomasz Prus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have AjaxLink which works good in Wicket 1.3.2 but doens't work whe i
> change version to 1.3.3.
>
> package pl.mainseek.car.wicket.components;
>
> import java.util
Apache mailing list doesn't support attachments. You need to create
JIRA issue and attachethe quickstart there.
-Matej
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 4:12 AM, Matthew Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Where is the attachment?
>
--
Resizable and reorderable grid components.
http://www.inmethod.com
neric, maybe they should
> >>> extend
> >>> (Web)MarkupContainer or something?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> MYoung wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >> public class HomePage extends WebPage {
> >>>
> >
Problem is that WebPage is generic class but your instance doesn't
have the type specified. Since you page doesn't have a model object
the type is not really necessary, but the compiler doesn't know that.
You can try this:
public class HomePage extends WebPage {
This should get rid of the wanin
You can use regular submit button only if you have a modal window with
page. If you have modal window with panel you are bound to using
ajaxbutton.
-Matej
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Cristi Manole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible to prevent the modal window from closin
sorry, this was supposed to go off the list, please don't reply here :)
-Matej
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 11:19 PM, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We (Johan and me - wicket committers) can look at your application as
> this problem seems to be quite ser
Hi,
We (Johan and me - wicket committers) can look at your application as
this problem seems to be quite serious. What would be the best way to
get the application running so that we can see it also we would need
to see some source code.
-Matej
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 10:53 PM, Edvin Syse <[EMAIL
x.
>
> Does that mean the TextField(String wickedId) constructor stopped working
> with CompoundPropertyModel?
>
>
>
>
> On 4/7/08, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Is this a new error? Looks like your models are unable to provide
> >
ve in are set to null.
>
> What is the common cause of this message?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 4/7/08, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > what do you mean?
> > that fix is no in the 1.3.3 release but will be in 1.3.4
> >
> >
&
Is you application running in clustered environment? Are you storing
the session reference anywhere?
-Matej
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 10:47 PM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is it really the wicket session or a page?
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 10:40 PM, Edvin Syse <[EMAIL PROTECT
Actually, it seems that I'm wrong about this...
-Matej
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 9:26 PM, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wicket 1.3.3 was released before april 06. The overflow fix is not
> part of the release.
>
> -Matej
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 7,
Wicket 1.3.3 was released before april 06. The overflow fix is not
part of the release.
-Matej
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 9:13 PM, Daniel Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've updated to the released Wicket 1.3.3, but I'm having the stackoverflow
> there, but it wasn't happening on the snapshot of ap
What wicket version are you using?
-Matej
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Daniel Stoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is a strange behaviour when I'm trying refresh
> WebMarkupContainer component using AjaxLink. I have a simple page:
>
> public HomePage(final PageParameters paramet
ej
>
>
>
> On 4/2/08, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm affraid we won't be able to help here without a testcase. We
> > already have a tests for this they pass, so it must be something we
> > didn't cover.
> >
&
You should try to add WebMarkupContainer to the style instead of
label.. Apart fomr that I don't see why it shouldn't be resolved.
-Matej
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Daniel Walmsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm writing a wicket template that produces a KML document, and it
passing 0 instead of -1 is definitely not the solution. This can
result in wrong page version set to other page references. I wish you
could provide a quickstart that reproduces the problem. It looks like
a bug in wicket but so far I'm not able to reproduce this behavior.
-Matej
On Fri, Apr 4, 20
This is really weird. Do you have any inter-page references in your application?
-Matej
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The oddness is what baffles me: Tomcat has no output anywhere. I have
> grepped and tailed the entire Tomcat logs directory, stdo
On the other hand, crawling non-bookmarkable pages is not very useful
anyway, since ?wicket:interface url will always get page expired when
you click on the result.
However, preserving session makes lot of sense with hybrid url. Google
remembers the original url (without page instance) while index
I'm affraid we won't be able to help here without a testcase. We
already have a tests for this they pass, so it must be something we
didn't cover.
Also that reminds me, there's problem with wicket tester, the page
reference serialization test (don't remember the exact name now) is
not running pro
That's really weird. Can you create a JIRA issue for it and maybe
attach a quickstart that demonstrates the behavior?
-Matej
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Jaap Bos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On my ModalWindow I have a number of (about 6) TreeTables, all using
> Ajax, generated in a ListView
You can use display:inline for the div.
-Matej
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Wouter Huijnink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marco Aurélio Silva wrote:
> > My point is: It doesn't work if the is inside the . And I can't
> > put a div (with div works) because the div has a line break.
> >
> >
:
> Actually, it works with span also on IE, it only not works if the span is
> inside the tag
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > It can not be . Span is an inline element so you can't put block
> >
>
> Maurice
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 9:33 PM, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sorry, I don't think the grid components are available in any public
> > repo. I'd add it to bamboo on wicketstuff but somehow i can't access
> > t
It can not be . Span is an inline element so you can't put block
element such as divs inside span. That is invalid markup and it
confuses browsers.
-Matej
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:22 PM, Marco Aurélio Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I found a bug in ModalWindow of wicket 1.2.6. I
Sorry, I don't think the grid components are available in any public
repo. I'd add it to bamboo on wicketstuff but somehow i can't access
the server.
-Matej
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 9:27 PM, Pinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Got a Noob questions here. I want to use the InMethod Grid for wick
Well, since I'm leaving the day after tomorrow, we could could maybe
have a beer tomorrow somewhere if any of the Copenhagen Wicket users
are interested. Flemming? Frank?
-Matej
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Only problem is, th
I agree that we should. But I'm not sure why the order is like this. Juergen?
-Matej
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 7:43 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> matej? do we guarantee the order? looks like we should?
>
> -igor
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Justin Morgan - Logic Se
Couldn't missing SerialVersionUUID cause this? Doesn't seem likely
though, I'd expect much saner exception in that case.
-Matej
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 3:24 AM, Scott Swank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Seemingly yes. If we write the session to disk, stop the jvm, restart
> the jvm, and then rea
Unfortunately there is not a straightforward way to do this. You can
add a feature request. In the meantime you can override
application#getDebugSettings and proxy the IDebugSettings interface so
that isAjaxDebugModeEnabled() method returns falue specific for
current session.
-Matej
On Fri, Mar 2
This doesn't work because the model.getObject method is only called
when the value is pulled out of the model, which is on label render.
Even if you refresh it on ajax request, it might be too late because
the feedback panel retrieves the feedback messages in onBeforeRender
(before actual rendering
It depends on the kind of error. Sometimes when it's xmlhttprequest
error we get no notification of it.
-Matej
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 9:21 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Matthew Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Small wish: in GMail, when th
I think the point here is not to call setEscapeModelString at all.
Unless I'm missing something the call is completely redundant in this
case and only results in invalid markup generated when user enters a
xml entity.
-Matej
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 9:48 PM, Per Newgro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Yes. < should never make it into your model object.
-Matej
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 7:26 PM, Marco Aurélio Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do you mean? If wicket escapes and unescapes it on database should be
> saved ">" instead ">" ?
>
>
&g
What you are saying makes little sense. Wicket escapes and unescapes
the field value transparently, so your model object will never contain
the >
-Matej
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 6:57 PM, Marco Aurélio Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Is there a way to set EscapeModelStrings to false
first page still gets that interface listener url. Why would
> HybridUrlCodingStrategy make it any different?
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Matej Knopp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 11:12 AM
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject:
if my
> contextpath="/"? HybridUrlCodingStrategy doesn't allow mapping "/".
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > you can mount your page using HybridUrlCodingStrategy.
Node changed event tells the tree that the node has been changed and
rebuilts the actual tree item component. Are you sure that you need to
refresh tree item component?
Btw. Why are you callind focusComponent on component that has just been blurred?
-Matej
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Lars B
Hi,
you can mount your page using HybridUrlCodingStrategy. Then it should
automatically redirect to URL that has page instance information in
it.
-Matej
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 7:48 PM, Matthew Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you Matej and Igor. I learned several new things. IAjaxCall
You have to use AjaxSubmitButton if you put panel into modal window.
-Matej
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Kai Mütz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Serzhas wrote:
> >
> > Hi. I am complete newby to Wicket, and currently making my way through the
> > "forest" if Wicket API :)
> > Today
Not everything in wicket can be bookmarkable and not everything can be
statelesss. None of the ajax examples could work on stateless pages
for example.
-Matej
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Sebastiaan van Erk
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matej Knopp wrote:
> > Why can&#x
Why can't we just put a 5 minute timer on each page which would casuse
active sessions never expire?
-Matej
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Sebastiaan van Erk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> > Making the source code viewing pages stateless won't help: next
> > question:
Hi,
that's certainly a very nice tutorial! You could consider
IAjaxCallDecorator instead of directly modyfing the onclick attribute.
See AjaxButton#getAjaxCallDecorator();
-Matej
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 9:04 PM, Matthew Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I am new to Wicket and to help me lea
That's really weird. updateTree() should work in all supported browsers.
-Matej
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 6:34 PM, jeredm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> One more note. The updateTree() call did work in Firefox, but not in IE6 or
> IE7.
>
>
>
>
> Matej Knopp-2
Creating new page version every time...
-Matej
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 7:17 PM, Gerolf Seitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the following works for me:
>
> // in your callback method
> PageParameters params = new PageParameters();
> params.put("page", getPageNumber());
> setResponsePage(MyPage.
You can mount your page using HybridUrlCodingStrateg. The resulting
url won't carry the currently selected page information, but it will
be much nicer than a interface listener url you are having now.
-Matej
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 7:07 PM, Dan Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
>
Tree(target);
>
> // Adding back in to get the node to display in the tree
> target.addComponent(tree);
>
>
> I appreciate your help. I don't think I am going to be able to build a
> quickstart any soon as I am swamped with work right now. I think that a
> qu
model is already gone.
>
> johan
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 12:53 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 3/15/08, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Not wit url like http://localhost:
301 - 400 of 859 matches
Mail list logo
