Re: AjaxLazyLoadPanel, nothing else works until it finishes loading

[avrahamr]

I'm having the same problem.
Have anyone found a solution?

On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 7:42 AM, wincen [via Apache Wicket] <
ml-node+2322202-522808124-117...@n4.nabble.com
> wrote:

> I got my AjaxLazyLoadPanel to work probably but nothing else on the page
> seems to process until after the contents of the panel are finished loading.
>
>
> I have some buttons on the form and if I click them while the panel is
> loading the button event code is not triggered until after the lazy load
> panel has finished.  Is there something I can do to allow my buttons work
> even if the lazyloadpanel has not finished loading?
>
> --
>  View message @
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/AjaxLazyLoadPanel-nothing-else-works-until-it-finishes-loading-tp2322202p2322202.html
> To start a new topic under Wicket - User, email
> ml-node+1842947-58522394-117...@n4.nabble.com
> To unsubscribe from Wicket - User, click 
> here.
>
>
>


-- 
[]'s
Avraham Rosenzweig
avrah...@gmail.com

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/AjaxLazyLoadPanel-nothing-else-works-until-it-finishes-loading-tp2322202p3058057.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Model Is Not being Refreshed

[avrahamr]

I think attachments are not good in the list, so we didn't get your code.

I'm not following the way you are mixing Model with the Object and I
recommend reading:
https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/working-with-wicket-models.html

The StudyModel should be something like this:
public class StudyModel implements IModel {

private Study study;
 public Object getObject() {
return study;
 }

public void setObject(Object object) {
this.study =  (Study)study;
 }
   ...

But if that's the case, I don't see a reason not to use the concrete Model
class: new Model(study)

Also, I see from your examples you are using Wicket 1.3.x, is that right?

With Wicket 1.4.x and generics it all becomes much more clear.

On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 11:38 AM, nivs [via Apache Wicket] <
ml-node+2313107-368287748-293...@n4.nabble.com
> wrote:

> After a long battle..i have progressed an inch forward!
>
> The StudyModel that implements IModel seemed to have the problem.
> I did not set the object in setObject...after modifying it in the following
>
> way..the Refresh button works.
>
>
> public Object getObject() {
> return this;
> }
>
> public void setObject(Object object) {
> StudyModel model = (StudyModel)object;
> this.studyVO = model.getStudyVO();
>
> }
>
> But I am not there as yet...now when I lookup and then click on an item
> from
> the list, the form again is empty..meaning the model is not being updated.
>
> So basically.
> 1.Search  Panel - Search items
> 2.SearchResults - onClick
> 3.Details- displayed correctly..., now I click cancel, tht hides the
> details
> panel
> 4. I click on New/Refresh button on Search Panel
> 5. A new details page is loaded - the effect of modifying setObject() in
> the
> Model
> 6.I click on cancel on details panel
> 7. And perform steps 1 to 2
> 8. An empty details panel is displayed...
>
> If i can get a single thread of clue..will fix this and cement it 
> Obviously I dont have a grip over Models..
>
> Cheers
> niv
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Nivedan Nadaraj <[hidden 
> email]>wrote:
>
>
> > Hi
> >
> >
> > After I added setOutputMarkupPlaceHolderTag(true) to the details panel,
> the
> > Ajax function works and I can see the details panel. (Which I could not
> > earlier)
> > However, the problem still remains as in the model has not been updated
> and
> > still refers to the stale/old one.
> >
> > @avrahmr
> > I used the setModel but I get a wicket runtime exception.
> >
> > Thanks for your thoughts.
> > Niv
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Nivedan Nadaraj <[hidden 
> > email]>wrote:
>
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have attached the code as a text file. I have removed lines that don't
>
> >> really make any contribution to the problem at hand after carefully
> >> examining it.
> >>
> >> Appreciate your time if you could see any issues please let me know.
> >>
> >> Basically the code has the Form objects I used, and the different panels
>
> >> involved with it.
> >>
> >> Many thanks
> >> Niv
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Nivedan Nadaraj <[hidden 
> >> email]>wrote:
>
> >>
> >>> Avraham and Matt,
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for the points. I will have a look at it tomorrow and post the
> >>> code if I still haven't resolved. I don't have the code on me at the
> moment.
> >>> Reg
> >>> Niv
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 9:41 PM, mwilber <[hidden 
> >>> email]>
> wrote:
> >>>
> 
>  Again without seeing more of the code some of this is guessing.
> 
>  If the component that you are trying to "update" is not part of the
>  original
>  HTML it will not be updated in the ajax response. I see that you are
>  marking
>  the component as visible and enabled. If it isn't visible during the
>  initial
>  rendering then it won't be placed in the HTML. If you mark the
> component
>  with
> 
> 
> http://wicket.apache.org/apidocs/1.4/org/apache/wicket/Component.html#setOutputMarkupPlaceholderTag(boolean
> )<
> http://wicket.apache.org/apidocs/1.4/org/apache/wicket/Component.html#setOutputMarkupPlaceholderTag%28boolean%29>
>
>  setOutputMarkupPlaceholderTag(true)  then the invisible component will
>
>  have
>  a placeholder to be updated during the ajax response.
>  --
>  View this message in context:
> 
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Model-Is-Not-being-Refreshed-tp2311457p2311876.html
>  Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
>  -
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden 
>  email]

Re: Model Is Not being Refreshed

[avrahamr]

Without seeing the code I can't be of much help, but I think the line:

 detailsPanel.getStudyForm().setModelObject(studyModel);

Should be:

 detailsPanel.getStudyForm().setModel(studyModel);

You could also keep a reference to the studyModel when you construct the
Form and just call:

 studyModel.setStudy();

But, it really depends on how you implement the StudyModel and how you
access it.

Cheers,
   Avraham

On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 11:17 AM, nivs [via Apache Wicket] <
ml-node+2311457-311556210-293...@n4.nabble.com
> wrote:

> Hi
>
> Can someone point me the right direction.
>
> I have a search panel that does a look up and renders a resultsPanel. I
> don't use detachable model here and used PageableListView
> On the resultsPanel,onClick, I use the hibernate entity and pass it as a
> model to the DetailsPanel. The detailsPanel renders it right no issue here.
>
>
> Now When I hit the New button(acutally after I click cancel button on
> Details, the details panel is set to visible=false).  on the search, I
> expect to see a fresh page in details panel, but
> the details panel uses the old values I selected and renders it.
>
> This is what I do on onNew submit button.
>
> I reset the model and set it to the form which should call
> setDefaultObjectModel.
>
> SearchPanel
>
>  onNew(){
> studyModel = new StudyModel();
> studyModel.setStudy(new Study());
> detailsPanel.getStudyForm().setModelObject(studyModel);
> detailsPanel.setVisible(true);
> }
>
> After onNew is executed, I don't see the model being updated. A bit lost
> here, any ideas?
>
> Thanks again
> Reg
> Niv
>
>
> --
>  View message @
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Model-Is-Not-being-Refreshed-tp2311457p2311457.html
> To start a new topic under Wicket - User, email
> ml-node+1842947-1647783149-293...@n4.nabble.com
> To unsubscribe from Wicket - User, click 
> here.
>
>
>


-- 
[]'s
Avraham Rosenzweig
avrah...@gmail.com

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Model-Is-Not-being-Refreshed-tp2311457p2311658.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Wicket stuff site

[avrahamr]

It was down for a while. Would it be too much to ask for a heads-up next
time :-)

On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Martijn Dashorst [via Apache Wicket] <
ml-node+2306488-1603966086-293...@n4.nabble.com
> wrote:

> Confluence is up and running again... Hoping to upgrade it to 3.3 soon...
>
> Martijn
>
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Martijn Dashorst
> <[hidden email] >
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Martin Grigorov <[hidden 
> > email]>
> wrote:
> >> Confluence is down right now for security reasons.
> >
> > Not really: it is down because we are (were?) working on installing
> > hudson and didn't want to wait 10 minutes for the container to start
> > up. I guess we can enable confluence again as hudson seems to be
> > humming quite nicely.
> >
> > The only service that is down for secutiry reasons is JIRA.
> >
> > Martijn
> >
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:47 AM, armandoxxx <[hidden 
> >> email]>wrote:
>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Hey ppl ...
> >>>
> >>> Does anyone know the right link to wicket stuff site .. cause link I
> find
> >>> on
> >>> google or other sites are not working ...
> >>>
> >>> http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI
> >>>
> >>> Kind regards
> >>>
> >>> Armando
> >>> --
> >>> View this message in context:
> >>>
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-stuff-site-tp2306142p2306142.html
> >>> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>>
> >>> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden 
> >>> email]
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden 
> >>> email]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: 
> > http://wicketinaction.com
> > Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications
> > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.8
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: 
> http://wicketinaction.com
> Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications
> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.8
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden 
> email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden 
> email]
>
>
>
> --
>  View message @
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-stuff-site-tp2306142p2306488.html
> To start a new topic under Wicket - User, email
> ml-node+1842947-1647783149-293...@n4.nabble.com
> To unsubscribe from Wicket - User, click 
> here.
>
>
>


-- 
[]'s
Avraham Rosenzweig
avrah...@gmail.com

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-stuff-site-tp2306142p2306496.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Using Apache mod rewrite to fix home page parameter problem

[avrahamr]

So there is were I don't follow.
You use crypted url strategy in order to have non bookmarkable links.
Now you want the homemage to have bookmarkable links.
So why not to stop using crypted url strategy for the homepage, you can use
it only for the pages you want non bookmarkable URLs.
Am I missing something?

Also, for the Wicket experts out there, can we do something like this on the
Application?
mount(new QueryStringUrlCodingStrategy("/", HomePage.class));

On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 2:18 PM, fatefree [via Apache Wicket] <
ml-node+2304786-2098886504-293...@n4.nabble.com
> wrote:

> I use a crypted url strategy for security on non bookmarkable page links.
> If you have a standard bookmarkable page, wicket will generate a REST style
> urls like /page/id/5, which will not be encrypted. However there seems to be
> an issue where if you try to mount the home page, it is generated as
> /page?id=1, which then gets encrypted.
>
> However instead of using apache mod rewrite, I found that if you set the
> index page to forward the request to another page using
> setResponsePage(StoriesPage.class), and do not redirect, the issue seems to
> be resolved.
>
> --
>  View message @
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Using-Apache-mod-rewrite-to-fix-home-page-parameter-problem-tp2303737p2304786.html
> To start a new topic under Wicket - User, email
> ml-node+1842947-1647783149-293...@n4.nabble.com
> To unsubscribe from Wicket - User, click 
> here.
>
>
>


-- 
[]'s
Avraham Rosenzweig
avrah...@gmail.com

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Using-Apache-mod-rewrite-to-fix-home-page-parameter-problem-tp2303737p2305504.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Using Apache mod rewrite to fix home page parameter problem

[avrahamr]

What do you mean "unintentionally"? Why do you use a crypted url strategy?


On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 6:54 PM, fatefree [via Apache Wicket] <
ml-node+2303737-2108181663-293...@n4.nabble.com
> wrote:

> I am looking for a solution to a nagging problem on my first wicket
> site, www.luckeffect.com.
>
> The problem is that page parameters are not bookmarkable on the page
> that is specified as the application home page. For an example, the
> breadcrumb link Home > 'Page 1' on http://www.luckeffect.com/ is
> unintentionally obfuscated through the crypted url coding strategy
> because the parameters on the home page are standard query parameters.
> However, on any other page, they are bookmarked correctly, for
> example, the exact same link on the unlucky page
> http://www.luckeffect.com/unlucky works as intended.
>
> One idea was to change my application home page to a class that simply
> redirects to a new StoriesPage, mapped to /stories. This fixes the
> page parameter problem, but I really don't like adding a redirect to
> the home page for seo reasons. To circumvent this, is it possible to
> use apache's mod rewrite to change www.luckeffect.com/ to
> www.luckeffect.com/stories behind the scenes? Are there any known
> problems with using apache mod rewrite with wicket?
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden 
> email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden 
> email]
>
>
>
> --
>  View message @
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Using-Apache-mod-rewrite-to-fix-home-page-parameter-problem-tp2303737p2303737.html
> To start a new topic under Wicket - User, email
> ml-node+1842947-1647783149-293...@n4.nabble.com
> To unsubscribe from Wicket - User, click 
> here.
>
>
>


-- 
[]'s
Avraham Rosenzweig
avrah...@gmail.com

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Using-Apache-mod-rewrite-to-fix-home-page-parameter-problem-tp2303737p2303959.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: IVisitor and IFormModelUpdateListener not extending Component

[avrahamr]

You can still visit all components and "manually" check if it is an
instanceof IFormModelUpdateListener

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Joseph Pachod [via Apache Wicket] <
ml-node+2302070-350349768-293...@n4.nabble.com
> wrote:

> hello
>
> I wanted to do an Component.IVisitor for all children components
> implementing IFormModelUpdateListener.
>
> However, IVisitor requires something extending Component, which
> IFormModelUpdateListener can't do (it's an interface).
>
> As such, I had to dump all generics info and do instanceof to get it
> running.
>
> However, for wicket 1.5 I guess, shouldn't there be an IComponent
> interface that IFormModelUpdateListener would implement ? IVisitor would
> then be of  and I could do an
> IVisitor.
>
> What's your pick on that ?
>
> ++
>
> --
> Joseph Pachod
> IT
>
> THOMAS DAILY GmbH
> Adlerstraße 19
> 79098 Freiburg
> Deutschland
> T  + 49 761 3 85 59 506
> F  + 49 761 3 85 59 550
> E  [hidden email] 
> www.thomas-daily.de
>
> Geschäftsführer/Managing Directors:
> Wendy Thomas, Susanne Larbig
> Handelsregister Freiburg i.Br., HRB 3947
>
> Registrieren Sie sich unter https://www.thomas-daily.de/user/sign-in für
> die TD Morning News, eine kostenlose Auswahl aktueller Themen aus TD
> Premium, morgens ab 9:15 in Ihrer Mailbox.
>
> Aktuelle Presseinformationen für die TD Morning News und TD Premium nimmt
> unsere Redaktion unter [hidden 
> email]entgegen.
> Redaktionsschluss für die TD Morning News ist täglich um 8:45.
>
> Register free of charge at https://www.thomas-daily.de/user/sign-in to
> have the TD Morning News, a selection of the latest topics from TD Premium,
> delivered to your mailbox from 9:15 every morning.
>
> Our editorial department receives the latest press releases for the TD
> Morning News and TD Premium at [hidden 
> email].
> The editorial deadline for the TD Morning News is 8.45am daily.
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden 
> email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden 
> email]
>
>
>
> --
>  View message @
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/IVisitor-T-extends-Component-and-IFormModelUpdateListener-not-extending-Component-tp2302070p2302070.html
> To start a new topic under Wicket - User, email
> ml-node+1842947-1647783149-293...@n4.nabble.com
> To unsubscribe from Wicket - User, click 
> here.
>
>
>


-- 
[]'s
Avraham Rosenzweig
avrah...@gmail.com

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/IVisitor-T-extends-Component-and-IFormModelUpdateListener-not-extending-Component-tp2302070p2302075.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: TextField

[avrahamr]

I've encontered the same problem and it took me a while to figure it out
why.

So maybe it's a good idea to make it automatic on the framework,

On all TextField constructors without the type parameter we should call
setType() like this:

setType((Class) ((ParameterizedType)
getClass().getGenericSuperclass()).getActualTypeArguments()[0]);

Too complicated??



On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:02 AM, Josh Glassman [via Apache Wicket] <
ml-node+2299461-894925024-293...@n4.nabble.com
> wrote:

> There is also a constructor that will take a Class type as a parameter.
>
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 3:11 PM, T Ames <[hidden 
> email]>
> wrote:
>
> > I think you have to use the setType(Integer.class) method on the
> TextField
> > object.
> >
> > setType
> >
> > public final FormComponent
> >
> >
> 
> >
> >
> >
>
> > *setType*(java.lang.Class type)
> >
> > Sets the type that will be used when updating the model for this
> component.
> > If no type is specified String type is assumed.
> >
> >  *Parameters:*type - *Returns:*this for chaining
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Douglas Ferguson <
> > [hidden email] >
> wrote:
> >
> > > Has anybody succesfully used TextField?
> > >
> > > I get an runtime exception trying to cast String to Integer.
> > >
> > > If supply (Integer.class) to the constructor then it is trying to case
> > Long
> > > to Integer.
> > >
> > > D/
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
>  View message @
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/TextField-Integer-tp2299053p2299461.html
> To start a new topic under Wicket - User, email
> ml-node+1842947-1647783149-293...@n4.nabble.com
> To unsubscribe from Wicket - User, click 
> here.
>
>
>


-- 
[]'s
Avraham Rosenzweig
avrah...@gmail.com

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/TextField-Integer-tp2299053p2299478.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Question - Does Wicket really initialize a page instance once?

[avrahamr]

But a different page instance for each person or browser section is expected
by any Java developer.

What is not so much expected is that for the same person, in the same
browser session, you can't rely on natural object identity, like Martin
said, thanks to serialization... But you can rely on object values, so if
you correctly implement hash and equals it should be fine.

On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Martin Makundi [via Apache Wicket] <
ml-node+2281423-751388596-293...@n4.nabble.com
> wrote:

> Also yes ;)
>
> 2010/7/7 James Carman <[hidden 
> email]>:
>
>
> > 2010/7/7 Martin Makundi <[hidden 
> > email]>:
>
> >> But remember... not being reconstructed does not mean that you won't
> >> have MULTIPLE INSTANCES of the same page.
> >>
> >> ... thanks to serialization ;)) so be warned if you code something
> >> that depends on instances.
> >
> > It's not just serialization.  A new page instance will be constructed
> > for each person that hits it.
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden 
> > email]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden 
> > email]
> >
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden 
> email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden 
> email]
>
>
>
> --
>  View message @
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Question-Does-Wicket-really-initialize-a-page-instance-once-tp2281200p2281423.html
> To start a new topic under Wicket - User, email
> ml-node+1842947-1647783149-293...@n4.nabble.com
> To unsubscribe from Wicket - User, click 
> here.
>
>
>


-- 
[]'s
Avraham Rosenzweig
avrah...@gmail.com

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Question-Does-Wicket-really-initialize-a-page-instance-once-tp2281200p2283205.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: is this a bug in Model?

[avrahamr]

Another option would be to directly implement IModel.

On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Rodolfo Hansen [via Apache Wicket] <
ml-node+2256139-803998731-293...@n4.nabble.com
> wrote:

> Are you sure you want to override Model in the first place?
> Di you see LoadableDetachableModel ?
>
> Model is not ment to be an abstract class,
> I would argue its not a bug, but that would be a whole other debate...
>
> On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 06:56 -0400, Alex Rass wrote:
>
> > No, Martin, it can't work.
> > Look at the implementation.
> >
> > ALL other methods use object directly.
> > SO if you just override getObject you'll endup with a broken:
> > equals(), hashCode(), toString() methods (which breaks any form of
> caching)
> > detach() would also be broken.
> >
> > So no, it can't work.
> > You HAVE to super.setObject() or setObject() directly and use internal
> > object to use Model class.
> > Which is not deadly, but a "need to know".
> >
> > Hence: is it a bug or a feature?
> > Igor? :)
> >
> > - Alex
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Martin Makundi [mailto:[hidden 
> > email]]
>
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 6:11 AM
> > To: [hidden email]
> > Subject: Re: is this a bug in Model?
> >
> > I did something similar and it works.
> >
> > **
> > Martin
> >
> > 2010/6/15 Alex Rass <[hidden 
> > email]>:
>
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > Was writing some code and encountered that
> > > org.apache.wicket.model.Model 
> > >
> > > Always uses direct references to 'object' variable directly. And never
> > > as getObject().
> > > This may hinder overriding methods.
> > >
> > > (I found this cause I overwrote getObject() and NOTHING changed :) I
> > > then looked at the source and knew how to fix it)
> > >
> > > Bug or feature?
> > >
> > > This is Wicket 1.4.7
> > >
> > > - Alex
> > >
> > >
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden 
> > > email]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden 
> > > email]
> > >
> > >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden 
> > email]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden 
> > email]
> >
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden 
> > email]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden 
> > email]
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
>  View message @
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/is-this-a-bug-in-Model-T-tp2255650p2256139.html
> To start a new topic under Wicket - User, email
> ml-node+1842947-1647783149-293...@n4.nabble.com
> To unsubscribe from Wicket - User, click 
> here.
>
>
>


-- 
[]'s
Avraham Rosenzweig
avrah...@gmail.com

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/is-this-a-bug-in-Model-T-tp2255650p2256282.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.