Re: AjaxLazyLoadPanel, nothing else works until it finishes loading
I'm having the same problem. Have anyone found a solution? On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 7:42 AM, wincen [via Apache Wicket] ml-node+2322202-522808124-117...@n4.nabble.comml-node%2b2322202-522808124-117...@n4.nabble.com wrote: I got my AjaxLazyLoadPanel to work probably but nothing else on the page seems to process until after the contents of the panel are finished loading. I have some buttons on the form and if I click them while the panel is loading the button event code is not triggered until after the lazy load panel has finished. Is there something I can do to allow my buttons work even if the lazyloadpanel has not finished loading? -- View message @ http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/AjaxLazyLoadPanel-nothing-else-works-until-it-finishes-loading-tp2322202p2322202.html To start a new topic under Wicket - User, email ml-node+1842947-58522394-117...@n4.nabble.comml-node%2b1842947-58522394-117...@n4.nabble.com To unsubscribe from Wicket - User, click herehttp://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/template/NodeServlet.jtp?tpl=unsubscribe_by_codenode=1842947code=YXZyYWhhbXJAZ21haWwuY29tfDE4NDI5NDd8LTEwMTIyNDQ2OTU=. -- []'s Avraham Rosenzweig avrah...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/AjaxLazyLoadPanel-nothing-else-works-until-it-finishes-loading-tp2322202p3058057.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Model Is Not being Refreshed
I think attachments are not good in the list, so we didn't get your code.
I'm not following the way you are mixing Model with the Object and I
recommend reading:
https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/working-with-wicket-models.html
The StudyModel should be something like this:
public class StudyModel implements IModel {
private Study study;
public Object getObject() {
return study;
}
public void setObject(Object object) {
this.study = (Study)study;
}
...
But if that's the case, I don't see a reason not to use the concrete Model
class: new Model(study)
Also, I see from your examples you are using Wicket 1.3.x, is that right?
With Wicket 1.4.x and generics it all becomes much more clear.
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 11:38 AM, nivs [via Apache Wicket]
ml-node+2313107-368287748-293...@n4.nabble.comml-node%2b2313107-368287748-293...@n4.nabble.com
wrote:
After a long battle..i have progressed an inch forward!
The StudyModel that implements IModel seemed to have the problem.
I did not set the object in setObject...after modifying it in the following
way..the Refresh button works.
public Object getObject() {
return this;
}
public void setObject(Object object) {
StudyModel model = (StudyModel)object;
this.studyVO = model.getStudyVO();
}
But I am not there as yet...now when I lookup and then click on an item
from
the list, the form again is empty..meaning the model is not being updated.
So basically.
1.Search Panel - Search items
2.SearchResults - onClick
3.Details- displayed correctly..., now I click cancel, tht hides the
details
panel
4. I click on New/Refresh button on Search Panel
5. A new details page is loaded - the effect of modifying setObject() in
the
Model
6.I click on cancel on details panel
7. And perform steps 1 to 2
8. An empty details panel is displayed...
If i can get a single thread of clue..will fix this and cement it
Obviously I dont have a grip over Models..
Cheers
niv
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Nivedan Nadaraj [hidden
email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2313107i=0wrote:
Hi
After I added setOutputMarkupPlaceHolderTag(true) to the details panel,
the
Ajax function works and I can see the details panel. (Which I could not
earlier)
However, the problem still remains as in the model has not been updated
and
still refers to the stale/old one.
@avrahmr
I used the setModel but I get a wicket runtime exception.
Thanks for your thoughts.
Niv
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Nivedan Nadaraj [hidden
email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2313107i=1wrote:
Hi,
I have attached the code as a text file. I have removed lines that don't
really make any contribution to the problem at hand after carefully
examining it.
Appreciate your time if you could see any issues please let me know.
Basically the code has the Form objects I used, and the different panels
involved with it.
Many thanks
Niv
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Nivedan Nadaraj [hidden
email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2313107i=2wrote:
Avraham and Matt,
Thanks for the points. I will have a look at it tomorrow and post the
code if I still haven't resolved. I don't have the code on me at the
moment.
Reg
Niv
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 9:41 PM, mwilber [hidden
email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2313107i=3
wrote:
Again without seeing more of the code some of this is guessing.
If the component that you are trying to update is not part of the
original
HTML it will not be updated in the ajax response. I see that you are
marking
the component as visible and enabled. If it isn't visible during the
initial
rendering then it won't be placed in the HTML. If you mark the
component
with
http://wicket.apache.org/apidocs/1.4/org/apache/wicket/Component.html#setOutputMarkupPlaceholderTag(boolean
)
http://wicket.apache.org/apidocs/1.4/org/apache/wicket/Component.html#setOutputMarkupPlaceholderTag%28boolean%29
setOutputMarkupPlaceholderTag(true) then the invisible component will
have
a placeholder to be updated during the ajax response.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Model-Is-Not-being-Refreshed-tp2311457p2311876.htmlhttp://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Model-Is-Not-being-Refreshed-tp2311457p2311876.html?by-user=t
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden
email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2313107i=4
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden
email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2313107i=5
--
View message @
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Model-Is-Not-being-Refreshed-tp2311457p2313107.html
To start a new topic
Re: Model Is Not being Refreshed
Without seeing the code I can't be of much help, but I think the line:
detailsPanel.getStudyForm().setModelObject(studyModel);
Should be:
detailsPanel.getStudyForm().setModel(studyModel);
You could also keep a reference to the studyModel when you construct the
Form and just call:
studyModel.setStudy();
But, it really depends on how you implement the StudyModel and how you
access it.
Cheers,
Avraham
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 11:17 AM, nivs [via Apache Wicket]
ml-node+2311457-311556210-293...@n4.nabble.comml-node%2b2311457-311556210-293...@n4.nabble.com
wrote:
Hi
Can someone point me the right direction.
I have a search panel that does a look up and renders a resultsPanel. I
don't use detachable model here and used PageableListView
On the resultsPanel,onClick, I use the hibernate entity and pass it as a
model to the DetailsPanel. The detailsPanel renders it right no issue here.
Now When I hit the New button(acutally after I click cancel button on
Details, the details panel is set to visible=false). on the search, I
expect to see a fresh page in details panel, but
the details panel uses the old values I selected and renders it.
This is what I do on onNew submit button.
I reset the model and set it to the form which should call
setDefaultObjectModel.
SearchPanel
onNew(){
studyModel = new StudyModel();
studyModel.setStudy(new Study());
detailsPanel.getStudyForm().setModelObject(studyModel);
detailsPanel.setVisible(true);
}
After onNew is executed, I don't see the model being updated. A bit lost
here, any ideas?
Thanks again
Reg
Niv
--
View message @
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Model-Is-Not-being-Refreshed-tp2311457p2311457.html
To start a new topic under Wicket - User, email
ml-node+1842947-1647783149-293...@n4.nabble.comml-node%2b1842947-1647783149-293...@n4.nabble.com
To unsubscribe from Wicket - User, click
herehttp://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/subscriptions/Unsubscribe.jtp?code=YXZyYWhhbXJAZ21haWwuY29tfDE4NDI5NDd8LTEwNzY0NzQ1ODc=.
--
[]'s
Avraham Rosenzweig
avrah...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Model-Is-Not-being-Refreshed-tp2311457p2311658.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Wicket stuff site
It was down for a while. Would it be too much to ask for a heads-up next time :-) On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Martijn Dashorst [via Apache Wicket] ml-node+2306488-1603966086-293...@n4.nabble.comml-node%2b2306488-1603966086-293...@n4.nabble.com wrote: Confluence is up and running again... Hoping to upgrade it to 3.3 soon... Martijn On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Martijn Dashorst [hidden email] http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2306488i=0 wrote: On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Martin Grigorov [hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2306488i=1 wrote: Confluence is down right now for security reasons. Not really: it is down because we are (were?) working on installing hudson and didn't want to wait 10 minutes for the container to start up. I guess we can enable confluence again as hudson seems to be humming quite nicely. The only service that is down for secutiry reasons is JIRA. Martijn On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:47 AM, armandoxxx [hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2306488i=2wrote: Hey ppl ... Does anyone know the right link to wicket stuff site .. cause link I find on google or other sites are not working ... http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI Kind regards Armando -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-stuff-site-tp2306142p2306142.htmlhttp://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-stuff-site-tp2306142p2306142.html?by-user=t Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2306488i=3 For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2306488i=4 -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.comhttp://wicketinaction.com?by-user=t Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.8 -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.comhttp://wicketinaction.com?by-user=t Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.8 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2306488i=5 For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2306488i=6 -- View message @ http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-stuff-site-tp2306142p2306488.html To start a new topic under Wicket - User, email ml-node+1842947-1647783149-293...@n4.nabble.comml-node%2b1842947-1647783149-293...@n4.nabble.com To unsubscribe from Wicket - User, click herehttp://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/subscriptions/Unsubscribe.jtp?code=YXZyYWhhbXJAZ21haWwuY29tfDE4NDI5NDd8LTEwNzY0NzQ1ODc=. -- []'s Avraham Rosenzweig avrah...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-stuff-site-tp2306142p2306496.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Using Apache mod rewrite to fix home page parameter problem
So there is were I don't follow. You use crypted url strategy in order to have non bookmarkable links. Now you want the homemage to have bookmarkable links. So why not to stop using crypted url strategy for the homepage, you can use it only for the pages you want non bookmarkable URLs. Am I missing something? Also, for the Wicket experts out there, can we do something like this on the Application? mount(new QueryStringUrlCodingStrategy(/, HomePage.class)); On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 2:18 PM, fatefree [via Apache Wicket] ml-node+2304786-2098886504-293...@n4.nabble.comml-node%2b2304786-2098886504-293...@n4.nabble.com wrote: I use a crypted url strategy for security on non bookmarkable page links. If you have a standard bookmarkable page, wicket will generate a REST style urls like /page/id/5, which will not be encrypted. However there seems to be an issue where if you try to mount the home page, it is generated as /page?id=1, which then gets encrypted. However instead of using apache mod rewrite, I found that if you set the index page to forward the request to another page using setResponsePage(StoriesPage.class), and do not redirect, the issue seems to be resolved. -- View message @ http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Using-Apache-mod-rewrite-to-fix-home-page-parameter-problem-tp2303737p2304786.html To start a new topic under Wicket - User, email ml-node+1842947-1647783149-293...@n4.nabble.comml-node%2b1842947-1647783149-293...@n4.nabble.com To unsubscribe from Wicket - User, click herehttp://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/subscriptions/Unsubscribe.jtp?code=YXZyYWhhbXJAZ21haWwuY29tfDE4NDI5NDd8LTEwNzY0NzQ1ODc=. -- []'s Avraham Rosenzweig avrah...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Using-Apache-mod-rewrite-to-fix-home-page-parameter-problem-tp2303737p2305504.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Using Apache mod rewrite to fix home page parameter problem
What do you mean unintentionally? Why do you use a crypted url strategy? On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 6:54 PM, fatefree [via Apache Wicket] ml-node+2303737-2108181663-293...@n4.nabble.comml-node%2b2303737-2108181663-293...@n4.nabble.com wrote: I am looking for a solution to a nagging problem on my first wicket site, www.luckeffect.com. The problem is that page parameters are not bookmarkable on the page that is specified as the application home page. For an example, the breadcrumb link Home 'Page 1' on http://www.luckeffect.com/ is unintentionally obfuscated through the crypted url coding strategy because the parameters on the home page are standard query parameters. However, on any other page, they are bookmarked correctly, for example, the exact same link on the unlucky page http://www.luckeffect.com/unlucky works as intended. One idea was to change my application home page to a class that simply redirects to a new StoriesPage, mapped to /stories. This fixes the page parameter problem, but I really don't like adding a redirect to the home page for seo reasons. To circumvent this, is it possible to use apache's mod rewrite to change www.luckeffect.com/ to www.luckeffect.com/stories behind the scenes? Are there any known problems with using apache mod rewrite with wicket? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2303737i=0 For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2303737i=1 -- View message @ http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Using-Apache-mod-rewrite-to-fix-home-page-parameter-problem-tp2303737p2303737.html To start a new topic under Wicket - User, email ml-node+1842947-1647783149-293...@n4.nabble.comml-node%2b1842947-1647783149-293...@n4.nabble.com To unsubscribe from Wicket - User, click herehttp://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/subscriptions/Unsubscribe.jtp?code=YXZyYWhhbXJAZ21haWwuY29tfDE4NDI5NDd8LTEwNzY0NzQ1ODc=. -- []'s Avraham Rosenzweig avrah...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Using-Apache-mod-rewrite-to-fix-home-page-parameter-problem-tp2303737p2303959.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: IVisitorT extends Component and IFormModelUpdateListener not extending Component
You can still visit all components and manually check if it is an instanceof IFormModelUpdateListener On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Joseph Pachod [via Apache Wicket] ml-node+2302070-350349768-293...@n4.nabble.comml-node%2b2302070-350349768-293...@n4.nabble.com wrote: hello I wanted to do an Component.IVisitor for all children components implementing IFormModelUpdateListener. However, IVisitor requires something extending Component, which IFormModelUpdateListener can't do (it's an interface). As such, I had to dump all generics info and do instanceof to get it running. However, for wicket 1.5 I guess, shouldn't there be an IComponent interface that IFormModelUpdateListener would implement ? IVisitor would then be of T extends IComponent and I could do an IVisitorIFormModelUpdateListener. What's your pick on that ? ++ -- Joseph Pachod IT THOMAS DAILY GmbH Adlerstraße 19 79098 Freiburg Deutschland T + 49 761 3 85 59 506 F + 49 761 3 85 59 550 E [hidden email] http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2302070i=0 www.thomas-daily.de Geschäftsführer/Managing Directors: Wendy Thomas, Susanne Larbig Handelsregister Freiburg i.Br., HRB 3947 Registrieren Sie sich unter https://www.thomas-daily.de/user/sign-in für die TD Morning News, eine kostenlose Auswahl aktueller Themen aus TD Premium, morgens ab 9:15 in Ihrer Mailbox. Aktuelle Presseinformationen für die TD Morning News und TD Premium nimmt unsere Redaktion unter [hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2302070i=1entgegen. Redaktionsschluss für die TD Morning News ist täglich um 8:45. Register free of charge at https://www.thomas-daily.de/user/sign-in to have the TD Morning News, a selection of the latest topics from TD Premium, delivered to your mailbox from 9:15 every morning. Our editorial department receives the latest press releases for the TD Morning News and TD Premium at [hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2302070i=2. The editorial deadline for the TD Morning News is 8.45am daily. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2302070i=3 For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2302070i=4 -- View message @ http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/IVisitor-T-extends-Component-and-IFormModelUpdateListener-not-extending-Component-tp2302070p2302070.html To start a new topic under Wicket - User, email ml-node+1842947-1647783149-293...@n4.nabble.comml-node%2b1842947-1647783149-293...@n4.nabble.com To unsubscribe from Wicket - User, click herehttp://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/subscriptions/Unsubscribe.jtp?code=YXZyYWhhbXJAZ21haWwuY29tfDE4NDI5NDd8LTEwNzY0NzQ1ODc=. -- []'s Avraham Rosenzweig avrah...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/IVisitor-T-extends-Component-and-IFormModelUpdateListener-not-extending-Component-tp2302070p2302075.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: TextFieldInteger
I've encontered the same problem and it took me a while to figure it out why. So maybe it's a good idea to make it automatic on the framework, On all TextFieldE constructors without the type parameter we should call setType() like this: setType((Class?) ((ParameterizedType) getClass().getGenericSuperclass()).getActualTypeArguments()[0]); Too complicated?? On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:02 AM, Josh Glassman [via Apache Wicket] ml-node+2299461-894925024-293...@n4.nabble.comml-node%2b2299461-894925024-293...@n4.nabble.com wrote: There is also a constructor that will take a Class type as a parameter. On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 3:11 PM, T Ames [hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2299461i=0 wrote: I think you have to use the setType(Integer.class) method on the TextField object. setType public final FormComponent file:///C:/Downloads/Java/wicket/apache-wicket-1.4.1/apidocs/org/apache/wicket/markup/html/form/FormComponent.htmlT file:///C:/Downloads/Java/wicket/apache-wicket-1.4.1/apidocs/org/apache/wicket/markup/html/form/FormComponent.html *setType*(java.lang.Class? type) Sets the type that will be used when updating the model for this component. If no type is specified String type is assumed. *Parameters:*type - *Returns:*this for chaining On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Douglas Ferguson [hidden email] http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2299461i=1 wrote: Has anybody succesfully used TextFieldInteger? I get an runtime exception trying to cast String to Integer. If supply (Integer.class) to the constructor then it is trying to case Long to Integer. D/ -- View message @ http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/TextField-Integer-tp2299053p2299461.html To start a new topic under Wicket - User, email ml-node+1842947-1647783149-293...@n4.nabble.comml-node%2b1842947-1647783149-293...@n4.nabble.com To unsubscribe from Wicket - User, click herehttp://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/subscriptions/Unsubscribe.jtp?code=YXZyYWhhbXJAZ21haWwuY29tfDE4NDI5NDd8LTEwNzY0NzQ1ODc=. -- []'s Avraham Rosenzweig avrah...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/TextField-Integer-tp2299053p2299478.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Question - Does Wicket really initialize a page instance once?
But a different page instance for each person or browser section is expected by any Java developer. What is not so much expected is that for the same person, in the same browser session, you can't rely on natural object identity, like Martin said, thanks to serialization... But you can rely on object values, so if you correctly implement hash and equals it should be fine. On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Martin Makundi [via Apache Wicket] ml-node+2281423-751388596-293...@n4.nabble.comml-node%2b2281423-751388596-293...@n4.nabble.com wrote: Also yes ;) 2010/7/7 James Carman [hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2281423i=0: 2010/7/7 Martin Makundi [hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2281423i=1: But remember... not being reconstructed does not mean that you won't have MULTIPLE INSTANCES of the same page. ... thanks to serialization ;)) so be warned if you code something that depends on instances. It's not just serialization. A new page instance will be constructed for each person that hits it. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2281423i=2 For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2281423i=3 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2281423i=4 For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2281423i=5 -- View message @ http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Question-Does-Wicket-really-initialize-a-page-instance-once-tp2281200p2281423.html To start a new topic under Wicket - User, email ml-node+1842947-1647783149-293...@n4.nabble.comml-node%2b1842947-1647783149-293...@n4.nabble.com To unsubscribe from Wicket - User, click herehttp://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/subscriptions/Unsubscribe.jtp?code=YXZyYWhhbXJAZ21haWwuY29tfDE4NDI5NDd8LTEwNzY0NzQ1ODc=. -- []'s Avraham Rosenzweig avrah...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Question-Does-Wicket-really-initialize-a-page-instance-once-tp2281200p2283205.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: is this a bug in ModelT?
Another option would be to directly implement IModelT. On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Rodolfo Hansen [via Apache Wicket] ml-node+2256139-803998731-293...@n4.nabble.comml-node%2b2256139-803998731-293...@n4.nabble.com wrote: Are you sure you want to override Model in the first place? Di you see LoadableDetachableModel ? Model is not ment to be an abstract class, I would argue its not a bug, but that would be a whole other debate... On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 06:56 -0400, Alex Rass wrote: No, Martin, it can't work. Look at the implementation. ALL other methods use object directly. SO if you just override getObject you'll endup with a broken: equals(), hashCode(), toString() methods (which breaks any form of caching) detach() would also be broken. So no, it can't work. You HAVE to super.setObject() or setObject() directly and use internal object to use ModelT class. Which is not deadly, but a need to know. Hence: is it a bug or a feature? Igor? :) - Alex -Original Message- From: Martin Makundi [mailto:[hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2256139i=0] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 6:11 AM To: [hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2256139i=1 Subject: Re: is this a bug in ModelT? I did something similar and it works. ** Martin 2010/6/15 Alex Rass [hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2256139i=2: Hi. Was writing some code and encountered that org.apache.wicket.model.Model T Always uses direct references to 'object' variable directly. And never as getObject(). This may hinder overriding methods. (I found this cause I overwrote getObject() and NOTHING changed :) I then looked at the source and knew how to fix it) Bug or feature? This is Wicket 1.4.7 - Alex - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2256139i=3 For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2256139i=4 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2256139i=5 For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2256139i=6 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2256139i=7 For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=2256139i=8 -- View message @ http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/is-this-a-bug-in-Model-T-tp2255650p2256139.html To start a new topic under Wicket - User, email ml-node+1842947-1647783149-293...@n4.nabble.comml-node%2b1842947-1647783149-293...@n4.nabble.com To unsubscribe from Wicket - User, click herehttp://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/subscriptions/Unsubscribe.jtp?code=YXZyYWhhbXJAZ21haWwuY29tfDE4NDI5NDd8LTEwNzY0NzQ1ODc=. -- []'s Avraham Rosenzweig avrah...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/is-this-a-bug-in-Model-T-tp2255650p2256282.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
