How to know the markupStream of a border body
Hi, I have a simple border: wicket:border test wicket:body/ /wicket:border and when I use this border I add content in the body: div wicket:id=myBorder more text more text /div Now, I want to know what is the markupStream of this border. I'm trying with MarkupStream st =getBodyContainer().getAssociatedMarkupStream(false); MarkupStream st =getBodyContainer().getMarkupStream(); But in don't receive the correct markupStream. The correct markupStream of this example should be: more text more text Thanks!! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/How-to-know-the-markupStream-of-a-border-body-tp14291014p14291014.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Extending parent of the parent markup
No, I cannot to extend AbstractTableView, because I have subclasses of TableView as SearchView that contains additional functionality, and I need to extend this SearchView. Alex Objelean wrote: I still think that you should not extend TableView, but AbstractTableView. So, you hierarchy would look like this: View (with markup) |-- AbstractTableView | -- MyView (provides its markup) |-- TableView (with markup) | -- SearchView Alex. buealb wrote: hi, jeje, We really have AbstractTableView, but the problem is another. We have a hierarchy like this: View (with markup) |-- AbstractTableView |-- TableView (with markup) | -- SearchView | -- MyView Where is in MyView where I want to redefine the markup. But I don't want to extend the markup of TableView, I want to extend directly the markup of the View. I would like to specify in MyView that is extending the markup of the View. The solution of Igor is the solution that now we are using, but I don't really like very much, because I have to repeat the markup of the view and the markup of the TableView in MyView. And only we want to change the markup of the TableView. I don't know if you are understand me... :-(( But thanks also. Alex Objelean wrote: I think that you have a design problem. You should pull up the common functionality to an abstract class (AbstractTableView) which extends View, and both TableView MyTableView should extend the AbstractTableView. Regards, Alex. buealb wrote: Because I have a lot of functionality in TableView that I want to use... Alex Objelean wrote: Since you want to redefine the markup of the TableView.html, why just not to extend the View.html? buealb wrote: Hi, I have this situation: View.html border .. child/ .. /border TableView.html (extends of View) extend .. child/ .. /extend MyTableView.html (extends of TableView) extend .. /extend In this case, MyTableView is extending by default the markup of TableView, because I'm extending of TableView. But in other cases, (MyTableView2) I would like to extend of TableView, but I would like to extend the markup of the View directly. I don't want to use the markup of the TableView, if is necessary I'll redefine the markup of the TableView in my MyTableView2... Do you understand me? Are there a solution for that? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Extending-parent-of-the-parent-markup-tf4895764.html#a14042395 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Extending parent of the parent markup
hi, jeje, We really have AbstractTableView, but the problem is another. We have a hierarchy like this: View (with markup) |-- AbstractTableView |-- TableView (with markup) | -- SearchView | -- MyView Where is in MyView where I want to redefine the markup. But I don't want to extend the markup of TableView, I want to extend directly the markup of the View. I would like to specify in MyView that is extending the markup of the View. The solution of Igor is the solution that now we are using, but I don't really like very much, because I have to repeat the markup of the view and the markup of the TableView in MyView. And only we want to change the markup of the TableView. I don't know if you are understand me... :-(( But thanks also. Alex Objelean wrote: I think that you have a design problem. You should pull up the common functionality to an abstract class (AbstractTableView) which extends View, and both TableView MyTableView should extend the AbstractTableView. Regards, Alex. buealb wrote: Because I have a lot of functionality in TableView that I want to use... Alex Objelean wrote: Since you want to redefine the markup of the TableView.html, why just not to extend the View.html? buealb wrote: Hi, I have this situation: View.html border .. child/ .. /border TableView.html (extends of View) extend .. child/ .. /extend MyTableView.html (extends of TableView) extend .. /extend In this case, MyTableView is extending by default the markup of TableView, because I'm extending of TableView. But in other cases, (MyTableView2) I would like to extend of TableView, but I would like to extend the markup of the View directly. I don't want to use the markup of the TableView, if is necessary I'll redefine the markup of the TableView in my MyTableView2... Do you understand me? Are there a solution for that? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Extending-parent-of-the-parent-markup-tf4895764.html#a14042372 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Extending parent of the parent markup
Hi, I have this situation: View.html border .. child/ .. /border TableView.html (extends of View) extend .. child/ .. /extend MyTableView.html (extends of TableView) extend .. /extend In this case, MyTableView is extending by default the markup of TableView, because I'm extending of TableView. But in other cases, (MyTableView2) I would like to extend of TableView, but I would like to extend the markup of the View directly. I don't want to use the markup of the TableView, if is necessary I'll redefine the markup of the TableView in my MyTableView2... Do you understand me? Are there a solution for that? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Extending-parent-of-the-parent-markup-tf4895764.html#a14021369 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Extending parent of the parent markup
Because I have a lot of functionality in TableView that I want to use... Alex Objelean wrote: Since you want to redefine the markup of the TableView.html, why just not to extend the View.html? buealb wrote: Hi, I have this situation: View.html border .. child/ .. /border TableView.html (extends of View) extend .. child/ .. /extend MyTableView.html (extends of TableView) extend .. /extend In this case, MyTableView is extending by default the markup of TableView, because I'm extending of TableView. But in other cases, (MyTableView2) I would like to extend of TableView, but I would like to extend the markup of the View directly. I don't want to use the markup of the TableView, if is necessary I'll redefine the markup of the TableView in my MyTableView2... Do you understand me? Are there a solution for that? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Extending-parent-of-the-parent-markup-tf4895764.html#a14028872 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: setRenderAllowed not called in Tree items
I'm working with the trunk. What wicket version are you using? -Matej On 9/13/07, buealb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm using Tree component. I have problems with the rendering of the children of an TreeItem. If I look the code of Component.renderComponent, after of calling to beforeRender(), you check if component and its children are allowed to be rendered (setRenderAllowed). But in Tree component, when you have to do the rendering of the TreeItem, only beforeRender() method is called, and setRenderAllowed method of the children never is called. Is it a bug or I have to do something to call to the setRenderAllowed method of the children manually? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/setRenderAllowed-not-called-in-Tree-items-tf4438712.html#a12664394 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/setRenderAllowed-not-called-in-Tree-items-tf4438712.html#a12669943 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
setRenderAllowed not called in Tree items
Hi, I'm using Tree component. I have problems with the rendering of the children of an TreeItem. If I look the code of Component.renderComponent, after of calling to beforeRender(), you check if component and its children are allowed to be rendered (setRenderAllowed). But in Tree component, when you have to do the rendering of the TreeItem, only beforeRender() method is called, and setRenderAllowed method of the children never is called. Is it a bug or I have to do something to call to the setRenderAllowed method of the children manually? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/setRenderAllowed-not-called-in-Tree-items-tf4438712.html#a12664394 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
