Re: how to fix this error in wicket app

That's great! Thanks On 16/1/13 17:25, saty wrote: Yes, this has been fixed in wicket 6.4.0 See below for more on this fix. http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/understanding-ajax-response-td4654310.html#a4654715 -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble

Re: Add an invisible component to an AjaxRequestTarget target

OK thnx will give it a try On 6/9/12 22:39, Igor Vaynberg wrote: isVisibleInHierarchy() will make sure all parents are visible as well -igor On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Thijs Vonk wrote: Hi, We have partial page updates all over a page. So panels and components all over the place that

Add an invisible component to an AjaxRequestTarget target

Hi, We have partial page updates all over a page. So panels and components all over the place that need Ajax updates. We're using an Interface on those components and with an IVisitor we traverse the component tree and add every component to the target that has this interface. But during dev

Re: Using Eclipse & Wicket for Modular Webapps

Looks really interresting, I've read the pdf. but it seems that there is a part missing at the end... On 2/6/09 6:02 PM, Thomas Mäder wrote: Hi Folks, I've been experimenting with getting the Eclipse plugin engine up inside a wicket application. The idea is to build Wicket applications out of

Re: Problems Ajax with Portlet 2.0 in Liferay 5.2.1

This is an issue with Liferay (see http://issues.liferay.com/browse/LPS-1911) You can probably fix it by making sure that portlet-name (in portlet.xml) and the wicketfilter mapping url-pattern are identical (portlet.xml & web.xml) On 2/5/09 4:30 PM, Benjamin Ernst wrote: Hi, I am Testing th

Re: Portlets (JSR-168) and Ajax

I have no experience with WSRP, but I do know that the portal should support a bit more then just jsr-168. See http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/portal-howto.html also the way DWR does it is different then the way wicket works. If I remember correctly DWR functions as a separate servlet next to te

Re: Invalid URLPatternSpec for Ajax Calls in Wicket Portlet

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1620 (Though it's still a work in process) and not yet supported by the wicket core committers On 11/20/08 9:17 PM, krisNog wrote: which portlet 2 patch are you referring to? Where is it available? Thanks Thijs wrote: But does it also have a

Re: Invalid URLPatternSpec for Ajax Calls in Wicket Portlet

But does it also have a problem if it's running a standalone wicket application? Btw I've run wicket portlets (with the portlet 2 patch) in Glassfish & open portal portlet container(v. rc2 then) and that worked just fine... So I don't know what the problem could be... Thijs On 11/19/08 8:44

Re: how to navigate from edit mode to view mode

You'll have to be more specific. What kind of problems. What works, what doesn't etc. Singh Mukesh wrote: Hi I have created a bookmark portlet using wicket. And the bookmark portlet includes two portlet- mode i.e. view and edit. I have deployed the basic portlet on sun portal. I have a proble

Re: Anybody tried Wicket with WebSphere portal?

Thats not completely correct. The current Wicket implementation depends on the PortletBridge implementation and is not 286 ready. Athough it has some 286 features like the resourceUrl, that part of the implementation depends on the PortletBridge implementation. Work is in progress to make Wic

Re: Wicket portles in Sun Portal

ep for man etc. :) Well, credits for those patches go to Thijs Vonk, I'm just the assignee of that issue :) Note though: those patches *as such* still need quite some refactoring (as already discussed on this list before) and the final JSR-286 support very likely will turn out a littl

Re: Anchors in Wicket?

Michael Mehrle wrote: How do create a link that jumps to some anchor in a page? Is there a way to define this in Wicket or do I have to do this manually somehow? Michael yes. use link.setAnchor(Component) - To unsubsc

Re: missing something: getting AjaxCheckBox to recheck value from model as its redrawn?

I'm not sure what you are saying here. But if it is what I'm thinking then you have misunderstood the meaning of .setDefaultFormProcessing. If your component is in a form, the 'defaultFormProcessing' will try to write any changes in the form to the model, and then call the onSubmit of the form

Re: Wicket Portlets in Liferay 5

vance, Benjamin On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 11:33 PM, Thijs Vonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Currently without building wicket against Liferay (using com.liferay.portlet.renderresponseimpl, instead of javax.portlet.renderresponse) it is not possible to run wicket without losing most

Re: Wicket Portlets in Liferay 5

Hi, Currently without building wicket against Liferay (using com.liferay.portlet.renderresponseimpl, instead of javax.portlet.renderresponse) it is not possible to run wicket without losing most of wickets functionality. I can, if you want, give you a patch and some instructions to get wicket

Re: Wicket Portlets in Liferay 5

Hi, I'm working on getting wicket compatible with jsr-286 now. However while doing this I've noticed that Liferay has still some major issues regarding jsr-286. Especially regarding setting properties on the response (essentially setting response headers, cookies, etc) there is still some wo

Re: best practice for a wait page

Scott Swank wrote: We have a page with a form and the form's onSubmit() method takes a while. After it is complete the user is re-directed to another page. We'd like to introduce a nice "please wait while we process your request" page in between these pages. If anyone has done this, what approa