it doesn't have a keyboard, let alone a JVM, but the version
number is so much bigger - it just has to be the best!
-Original Message-
From: msj121 [mailto:msj...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, 2 April 2011 8:56 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering
I've had a hard time lately trying to get corporate acceptance of the Wicket
framework.
In fact, our company looked at this comparison of java frameworks:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_application_frameworks
*Project* *Current Stable Version* Apache Click 2.2.0 Apache
where do i apply for a job there? sounds like fun!
-igor
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Jim Pinkham pinkh...@gmail.com wrote:
I've had a hard time lately trying to get corporate acceptance of the Wicket
framework.
In fact, our company looked at this comparison of java frameworks:
Gotta be a aprils fools thing..
Who would decide what framework to be used based on version number?
Why not take a look at architecture instead... Ooh lets chose windows
95 instead of windows 7, it has a higher number so it gotta be better
.
2011/4/1 Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com:
where
W dniu 01.04.2011 20:14, nino martinez wael pisze:
Gotta be a aprils fools thing..
Who would decide what framework to be used based on version number?
Why not take a look at architecture instead... Ooh lets chose windows
95 instead of windows 7, it has a higher number so it gotta be better
im running win 2000, you guys are too far behind.
-igor
2011/4/1 Rafał Krupiński r.krupin...@gmail.com:
W dniu 01.04.2011 20:14, nino martinez wael pisze:
Gotta be a aprils fools thing..
Who would decide what framework to be used based on version number?
Why not take a look at
hah some of our servers are 2008 r2 :)
However im considering doing a nix distribution called HAL 9000 as
it probably will attract a lot of users based on the high number...
2011/4/1 Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com:
im running win 2000, you guys are too far behind.
-igor
2011/4/1
OMG?!? ARE YOU SERIOUS??? Here we are already using WINDOWS 2000 with
OFFICE 2010 ;)
(Note: never ever believe any mails, blogs, newspapers on april 1st *g*)
Am 01.04.11 20:14, schrieb nino martinez wael:
Gotta be a aprils fools thing..
Who would decide what framework to be used based on
I mean XP is letters... That is pretty amazing, there isn't even a number,
and even roman numerals, is there a 'P' in roman numerals?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Vote-New-Wicket-Version-Numbering-tp3420887p3421249.html
Sent from the Users forum
: Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering
I mean XP is letters... That is pretty amazing, there isn't even a
number,
and even roman numerals, is there a 'P' in roman numerals?
--
View this message in context: http://apache-
wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Vote-New-Wicket-Version-Numbering
]
Sent: Saturday, 2 April 2011 8:56 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering
I mean XP is letters... That is pretty amazing, there isn't even a
number,
and even roman numerals, is there a 'P' in roman numerals?
--
View this message in context: http
11 matches
Mail list logo