Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering

2011-04-02 Thread Peter Ertl
it doesn't have a keyboard, let alone a JVM, but the version number is so much bigger - it just has to be the best! -Original Message- From: msj121 [mailto:msj...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, 2 April 2011 8:56 AM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering

[Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering

2011-04-01 Thread Jim Pinkham
I've had a hard time lately trying to get corporate acceptance of the Wicket framework. In fact, our company looked at this comparison of java frameworks: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_application_frameworks *Project* *Current Stable Version* Apache Click 2.2.0 Apache

Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering

2011-04-01 Thread Igor Vaynberg
where do i apply for a job there? sounds like fun! -igor On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Jim Pinkham pinkh...@gmail.com wrote: I've had a hard time lately trying to get corporate acceptance of the Wicket framework. In fact, our company looked at this comparison of java frameworks:

Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering

2011-04-01 Thread nino martinez wael
Gotta be a aprils fools thing.. Who would decide what framework to be used based on version number? Why not take a look at architecture instead... Ooh lets chose windows 95 instead of windows 7, it has a higher number so it gotta be better . 2011/4/1 Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com: where

Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering

2011-04-01 Thread Rafał Krupiński
W dniu 01.04.2011 20:14, nino martinez wael pisze: Gotta be a aprils fools thing.. Who would decide what framework to be used based on version number? Why not take a look at architecture instead... Ooh lets chose windows 95 instead of windows 7, it has a higher number so it gotta be better

Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering

2011-04-01 Thread Igor Vaynberg
im running win 2000, you guys are too far behind. -igor 2011/4/1 Rafał Krupiński r.krupin...@gmail.com: W dniu 01.04.2011 20:14, nino martinez wael pisze: Gotta be a aprils fools thing.. Who would decide what framework to be used based on version number? Why not take a look at

Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering

2011-04-01 Thread nino martinez wael
hah some of our servers are 2008 r2 :) However im considering doing a nix distribution called HAL 9000 as it probably will attract a lot of users based on the high number... 2011/4/1 Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com: im running win 2000, you guys are too far behind. -igor 2011/4/1

Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering

2011-04-01 Thread Korbinian Bachl - whiskyworld
OMG?!? ARE YOU SERIOUS??? Here we are already using WINDOWS 2000 with OFFICE 2010 ;) (Note: never ever believe any mails, blogs, newspapers on april 1st *g*) Am 01.04.11 20:14, schrieb nino martinez wael: Gotta be a aprils fools thing.. Who would decide what framework to be used based on

Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering

2011-04-01 Thread msj121
I mean XP is letters... That is pretty amazing, there isn't even a number, and even roman numerals, is there a 'P' in roman numerals? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Vote-New-Wicket-Version-Numbering-tp3420887p3421249.html Sent from the Users forum

RE: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering

2011-04-01 Thread Chris Colman
: Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering I mean XP is letters... That is pretty amazing, there isn't even a number, and even roman numerals, is there a 'P' in roman numerals? -- View this message in context: http://apache- wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Vote-New-Wicket-Version-Numbering

Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering

2011-04-01 Thread Bruno Borges
] Sent: Saturday, 2 April 2011 8:56 AM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering I mean XP is letters... That is pretty amazing, there isn't even a number, and even roman numerals, is there a 'P' in roman numerals? -- View this message in context: http