RE: Can't get round this problem
I have googled around for an external form in wicket but havn't found anything. I've seen some code on using WebMarkupContainer but I can't get validation to work with that. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Can%27t-get-round-this-problem-tp17723379p17729068.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can't get round this problem
Hmm so you want a form with validation(wicket serverside validation), but it should action against an external site? I dont think thats the way to go. Please explain what you are trying todo? If you are just addend the md5 in a hidden attrib that should be trivial, just use a webmarkup container and a attribute modifier. Validation should be up to the external site, otherwise you need to action against wicket and then if the form is valid then forward the request to the other site.. But that seems a bit flaky and very unsecure anyway. Mathias P.W Nilsson wrote: I have googled around for an external form in wicket but havn't found anything. I've seen some code on using WebMarkupContainer but I can't get validation to work with that. -- -Wicket for love Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can't get round this problem
Don't use a HiddenField on the Wicket side but a WebMarkupContainer. The HTML side remains the same (i.e., input tag). Regards, Sebastiaan Mathias P.W Nilsson wrote: I have a page that has 2 fragment. One for normal ordering and one for credit card ordering. When sending the input type hidden names they must have the exact name but wicket changes it orderPanel:Merchant_id must be Merchant_id. How can I remove the orderPanel that adds to the markup. I have tried to extend the hidden field and override the protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) but this just makes it work even worse. Why must wicket change the name of the input tag? Is there a way around this. I must be able to specify my own name. I was hoping that just new HiddenField( Merchant_id, new Model( ) ); would do the trick but wicket changes that name. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Can't get round this problem
I want to populate 15 hidden fileds with data on AjaxSubmitLink( css styled button ). There is some validation on the form messaged back to the user using feedback. If the form is correct I want to post to external url. That's it. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Can%27t-get-round-this-problem-tp17723379p17730159.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can't get round this problem
Okay but the problem is that if you go serverside towards wicket then you need to make the user do an extra submit, I guess you could use a normal wicket form, then submit via ajax. If validation are okay, return another completely hidden form with the values and submit it via the client/browser by appending javascript(not sure if some browsers dont like this). That should do it, smoothly for the user but not so smoothly technically.. Mathias P.W Nilsson wrote: I want to populate 15 hidden fileds with data on AjaxSubmitLink( css styled button ). There is some validation on the form messaged back to the user using feedback. If the form is correct I want to post to external url. That's it. -- -Wicket for love Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can't get round this problem
This is what I do now. When Ajax onSubmit is ok I append a callback that set's the forms action and post it. I have also now, changed the name on submit so that works, ( ugly of course ) . Problem is the flickering I append javascript to the target on AjaxSubmitLink but it makes a sort of post back first. Because when I empty the cart before submitting the form I see that the Listview is empty for a second. If I append the javascript in the decoration sequence then the validation never occurs. This will only work if the user have javascript enabled. But I guess most users do. I understand the problem with external post but I know there are some wizards out there that could implement this. Maybe in the next wicket release. External form? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Can%27t-get-round-this-problem-tp17723379p17730498.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can't get round this problem
Mathias P.W Nilsson wrote: This is what I do now. When Ajax onSubmit is ok I append a callback that set's the forms action and post it. Hmm okay, not completely what I meant. I'd rater make a clean panel with markup containers where you set what you have and append that and submit that instead. I have also now, changed the name on submit so that works, ( ugly of course ) . Problem is the flickering You'll get that because you need double post, you could hide the form on submit.. I append javascript to the target on AjaxSubmitLink but it makes a sort of post back first. Yes. Because you need the validation to go thru, calling wicket first. Because when I empty the cart before submitting the form I see that the Listview is empty for a second. Hmm, sounds like something else? Are you having a heartbeat or something like it on your page? If I append the javascript in the decoration sequence then the validation never occurs. No because you need it to first post to wicket. This will only work if the user have javascript enabled. Yes hence the javascript and AJAX bit. Otherwise you need for the user to click twice, like once for validation and once for the real submit. This could be okay too, you could then on the second submit just show labels, and write that they now are validated and ask if they are sure they want to submit this. But I guess most users do. I understand the problem with external post but I know there are some wizards out there that could implement this. Maybe in the next wicket release. External form? Hmm an real external form would not have anything todo with wicket, you could just have the form on the page without attaching it to wicket with wicket:id's so no need for anything in wicket todo this Or I could have gotten it wrong.. -- -Wicket for love Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can't get round this problem
Here is the fragment for sending external data. The form is a class variable
and is visible in the fragment
final class PostenOrderFragment extends Fragment{
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
public PostenOrderFragment( String panel, String id ){
super( panel, id, OrderControl.this );
final PostenOrder order = (PostenOrder) getOrder();
/* Transfer user data. Copy the data from the user to the order
*/
order.transferUserData(
((HairlessSession)getSession()).getUser() );
final HiddenField Merchant_id = new HiddenField(
Merchant_id, new
Model( ) );
final HiddenField Version = new HiddenField( Version, new
Model(
));
final HiddenField Customer_refno = new HiddenField(
Customer_refno, new
Model( ));
final HiddenField Currency = new HiddenField( Currency, new
Model(
));
final HiddenField Amount = new HiddenField( Amount, new
Model( ));
final HiddenField VAT = new HiddenField( VAT, new Model(
));
final HiddenField Payment_method = new HiddenField(
Payment_method,
new Model( ) );
final HiddenField Purchase_date = new HiddenField(
Purchase_date, new
Model( ) );
final HiddenField Response_URL = new HiddenField(
Response_URL, new
Model( ) );
final HiddenField Card_num = new HiddenField( Card_num, new
Model( )
);
final HiddenField Cvx2 = new HiddenField( Cvx2, new Model(
) );
final HiddenField Exp_date = new HiddenField( Exp_date, new
Model(
) );
final HiddenField Card_type = new HiddenField( Card_type,
new Model(
) );
final HiddenField MAC = new HiddenField( MAC, new Model(
) );
add( Merchant_id );
add( Version);
add( Customer_refno);
add( Currency );
add( Amount );
add( VAT );
add( Payment_method );
add( Purchase_date );
add( Response_URL);
add(Card_num );
add(Cvx2 );
add(Exp_date );
add( Card_type );
add( MAC );
add(new AjaxSubmitLink( placeOrder, form ) {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Override
protected IAjaxCallDecorator getAjaxCallDecorator(){
return new IAjaxCallDecorator(){
private static final long
serialVersionUID = 1L;
public CharSequence
decorateScript(CharSequence script)
{
return
document.getElementById('+ getMarkupId()
+').disabled=true;+script;
}
public CharSequence
decorateOnFailureScript(CharSequence script)
{
return
script+document.getElementById('+ getMarkupId()
+').disabled=false;;
}
public CharSequence
decorateOnSuccessScript(CharSequence script)
{
return
script+document.getElementById('+ getMarkupId()
+').disabled=false;;
}
};
}
protected void onError(AjaxRequestTarget target, Form
form){
target.addComponent(feedback);
target.addComponent(form);
}
@Override
protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target, Form
form ) {
if( target != null ){
target.addComponent(this);
target.addComponent(form);
target.addComponent(feedback);
if( !
((Boolean)acceptConditions.getModelObject() ).booleanValue() ){
info( Du måste godkänna
köpvillkoren );
return;
Re: Can't get round this problem
Okay, im writing inline...
Mathias P.W Nilsson wrote:
Here is the fragment for sending external data. The form is a class variable
and is visible in the fragment
final class PostenOrderFragment extends Fragment{
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
public PostenOrderFragment( String panel, String id ){
super( panel, id, OrderControl.this );
final PostenOrder order = (PostenOrder) getOrder();
/* Transfer user data. Copy the data from the user to the order
*/
order.transferUserData(
((HairlessSession)getSession()).getUser() );
final HiddenField Merchant_id = new HiddenField(
Merchant_id, new
Model( ) );
final HiddenField Version = new HiddenField( Version, new Model(
));
final HiddenField Customer_refno = new HiddenField(
Customer_refno, new
Model( ));
final HiddenField Currency = new HiddenField( Currency, new Model(
));
final HiddenField Amount = new HiddenField( Amount, new Model(
));
final HiddenField VAT = new HiddenField( VAT, new Model(
));
final HiddenField Payment_method = new HiddenField( Payment_method,
new Model( ) );
final HiddenField Purchase_date = new HiddenField(
Purchase_date, new
Model( ) );
final HiddenField Response_URL = new HiddenField(
Response_URL, new
Model( ) );
final HiddenField Card_num = new HiddenField( Card_num, new Model(
)
);
final HiddenField Cvx2 = new HiddenField( Cvx2, new Model(
) );
final HiddenField Exp_date = new HiddenField( Exp_date, new Model(
) );
final HiddenField Card_type = new HiddenField( Card_type,
new Model(
) );
final HiddenField MAC = new HiddenField( MAC, new Model(
) );
add( Merchant_id );
add( Version);
add( Customer_refno);
add( Currency );
add( Amount );
add( VAT );
add( Payment_method );
add( Purchase_date );
add( Response_URL);
add(Card_num );
add(Cvx2 );
add(Exp_date );
add( Card_type );
add( MAC );
add(new AjaxSubmitLink( placeOrder, form ) {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Override
protected IAjaxCallDecorator getAjaxCallDecorator(){
return new IAjaxCallDecorator(){
private static final long
serialVersionUID = 1L;
public CharSequence
decorateScript(CharSequence script)
{
return
document.getElementById('+ getMarkupId()
+').disabled=true;+script;
}
public CharSequence
decorateOnFailureScript(CharSequence script)
{
return
script+document.getElementById('+ getMarkupId()
+').disabled=false;;
}
public CharSequence
decorateOnSuccessScript(CharSequence script)
{
return
script+document.getElementById('+ getMarkupId()
+').disabled=false;;
}
};
}
Im not sure why you need the above, could'nt you just append it to
target below, and have all code the same place?. I guess I just havent
used ajaxcalldecorators that much.
protected void onError(AjaxRequestTarget target, Form
form){
target.addComponent(feedback);
target.addComponent(form);
}
@Override
protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target, Form
form ) {
if( target != null ){
target.addComponent(this);
Not sure why you need the ajax button added again?
target.addComponent(form);
Why do you need the form to be updated? If anything then only the hidden
field with hash value?
Re: Can't get round this problem
Thanks! I haven't posted all code but there is a check box acceptConditions that must be clicked to get this to work How can this be implemented in two forms? I'm not quite following. First I need to have wicket check all the data and that the conditions is checked. And then, how can I submit the other none wicket form? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Can%27t-get-round-this-problem-tp17723379p17738820.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can't get round this problem
Mathias P.W Nilsson wrote: Thanks! No problem. I haven't posted all code but there is a check box acceptConditions that must be clicked to get this to work Okay, but just add that then if it's needed. Always remember when working with ajax only to update whats need or you could just use normal posting. The idea are to update as little as possible, that will also reduce flickering. How can this be implemented in two forms? I'm not quite following. First I need to have wicket check all the data and that the conditions is checked. I think you got that right:) And then, how can I submit the other none wicket form? Okay then you have a nonvisible non wicket form (yes I know it's not very DRY). You can then set the values in that one instead using your javascript, that way you wont be messing with wicket. Just have the form in the .html and modify your javascript to call that one... -- -Wicket for love Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can't get round this problem
Sounds like you're submitting the info to another website (not back to your wicket app), in which case you should just use a plain HTML form (without associated wicket form components): wicket won't change the input field names then. Alex -Original Message- From: Mathias P.W Nilsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sun 6/8/2008 5:31 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Can't get round this problem I have a page that has 2 fragment. One for normal ordering and one for credit card ordering. When sending the input type hidden names they must have the exact name but wicket changes it orderPanel:Merchant_id must be Merchant_id. How can I remove the orderPanel that adds to the markup. I have tried to extend the hidden field and override the protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) but this just makes it work even worse. Why must wicket change the name of the input tag? Is there a way around this. I must be able to specify my own name. I was hoping that just new HiddenField( Merchant_id, new Model( ) ); would do the trick but wicket changes that name. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Can%27t-get-round-this-problem-tp17723379p17723379.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can't get round this problem
The hidden fields are set after ajax submit and then I set the action on the form. I must MD5 some fields before submitting. Why can't this be done in wicket? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Can%27t-get-round-this-problem-tp17723379p17723787.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can't get round this problem
I imagine it can be done, but I don't know how. You might want to explain more about what you're trying to do. -Original Message- From: Mathias P.W Nilsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sun 6/8/2008 6:08 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: RE: Can't get round this problem The hidden fields are set after ajax submit and then I set the action on the form. I must MD5 some fields before submitting. Why can't this be done in wicket? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
