Thanks igor for your Contribution.
I did it now with my own "TreeNode"-Type and my own
"AbstractTree"-Implementation:
@Override
protected void populateTreeItem(WebMarkupContainer item, int level) {
super.populateTreeItem(item, level);
//Is this Node visible or not?
item.add(
new AbstractBehavior() {
@Override
public void onComponentTag(Component component,
ComponentTag tag) {
TreeNode node =
(TreeNode)component.getDefaultModelObject();
if(!node.isVisible()){
tag.put("class", (
tag.getString("class") + " hidden") );
}
}
}
);
}
igor.vaynberg wrote:
>
> filter them in your TreeModel, it should work. you also have to
> override getChildCount() to return a count without filtered children,
> and adjust TreeModel#getIndexOfChild() to skip over the filtered
> children.
>
> -igor
>
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 6:19 AM, Martin U
> wrote:
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> i've to implement a tree in which some node are exists under a parent
>> node
>> but they should not be visible to the user in browser at all.
>>
>> I tried to overwrite "getChild" from TreeNode. But it dont works for me.
>> I
>> need this node existens either they are not visible because the tree is
>> my
>> data(model)-holder too for further processing
>>
>>
>> Any Ideas?
>>
>> Thanks a lot.
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Tree-with-invisible-Nodes-tp27945428p27950906.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
