it was built by wicket earlier in the process).
> >>>
> >>> What am I missing? This is a common use pattern so I am doing
> >>> something wrong since obviously the form has the data as back/forth
> >>> show it just fine. The only work-around I can think of
can think of is to not add
>>> this step and then insert this step at the end myself (once the
>>> objects are populated). Seems hacky though.
>>>
>>> Tx
>>> John-
>>>
>>> -
>
it just fine. The only work-around I can think of is to not add
>> this step and then insert this step at the end myself (once the
>> objects are populated). Seems hacky though.
>>
>> Tx
>> John-
>>
>> -------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsu
p at the end myself (once the
> objects are populated). Seems hacky though.
>
> Tx
> John-
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>
>
--
View this mess
It may just be late and I am missing the obvious but..
I have a wizard. The last step needs to be a confirmation step however
it is constructed when added to the WizardModel in the Wizard
constructor and at this stage all of the backing models are empty
since, well, the user hasn't done anything.
