Re: 1.3.0-beta2/3 broken in the m2 repo?

2007-09-12 Thread Martijn Dashorst
To depend on Wicket you need to add the following two dependencies: org.apache.wicket wicket 1.3.0-beta3 org.slf4j slf4j-log4j12 1.4.0 (the latter only if you want to use log4j as a logging implementation, which is what about 99% of our users want). If you want to use

Re: 1.3.0-beta2/3 broken in the m2 repo?

2007-09-12 Thread Craig Tataryn
Interesting. Well I assumed that by depending on it, it would pull in all the right dependencies. You see, when you just link to groupId= org.apache.wicket artifactId=wicket you don't get any dependencies and ultimately your webapp fails. In my mind the power of maven is to provide that "yum-lik

Re: 1.3.0-beta2/3 broken in the m2 repo?

2007-09-12 Thread Martijn Dashorst
there are 2 things wrong with your approach: 1. wicket-parent is not a jar, so you should have used an additional pom 2. wicket-parent is not a jar, so you should not try to depend on it in the first place Why are you trying to depend on wicket-parent? Martijn On 9/12/07, Craig Tataryn <[EMAIL

Re: 1.3.0-beta2/3 broken in the m2 repo?

2007-09-11 Thread Craig Tataryn
"Does work when trying to download directly from" Meant "Doesn't" not Does. On 9/11/07, Craig Tataryn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Tried grabbing: > > > org.apache.wicket > wicket-parent > 1.3.0-beta3 > > > And then: > > > org.apache.wicket > wicket-parent > 1.3.0-bet

1.3.0-beta2/3 broken in the m2 repo?

2007-09-11 Thread Craig Tataryn
Tried grabbing: org.apache.wicket wicket-parent 1.3.0-beta3 And then: org.apache.wicket wicket-parent 1.3.0-beta2 Each bomb with the "Failed to resolve artifact.Missing:1) org.apache.wicket:wicket-parent:jar:1.3.0-beta2" (same for beta3). Does work when trying to do