Re: 1.3.0-beta2/3 broken in the m2 repo?

2007-09-12 Thread Martijn Dashorst
To depend on Wicket you need to add the following two dependencies:


org.apache.wicket
wicket
1.3.0-beta3


org.slf4j
slf4j-log4j12
1.4.0


(the latter only if you want to use log4j as a logging implementation,
which is what about 99% of our users want).

If you want to use wicket-extensions you can add the following to your pom:

org.apache.wicket
wicket-extensions
1.3.0-beta3


In this case you *could* remove the wicket dependency itself, because
the transitive dependency management of Maven will pull it in for you.

Martijn


On 9/12/07, Craig Tataryn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Interesting.  Well I assumed that by depending on it, it would pull in all
> the right dependencies.  You see, when you just link to groupId=
> org.apache.wicket artifactId=wicket you don't get any dependencies and
> ultimately your webapp fails.
>
> In my mind the power of maven is to provide that "yum-like" nature of
> resolving a dependency and all of it's dependencies, and so on.
>
> Craig.
>
> On 9/12/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > there are 2 things wrong with your approach:
> >
> > 1. wicket-parent is not a jar, so you should have used an additional
> > pom
> > 2. wicket-parent is not a jar, so you should not try to depend on it
> > in the first place
> >
> > Why are you trying to depend on wicket-parent?
> >
> > Martijn
> >
> > On 9/12/07, Craig Tataryn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Tried grabbing:
> > >
> > > 
> > > org.apache.wicket
> > > wicket-parent
> > > 1.3.0-beta3
> > > 
> > >
> > > And then:
> > >
> > > 
> > > org.apache.wicket
> > > wicket-parent
> > > 1.3.0-beta2
> > > 
> > >
> > > Each bomb with the "Failed to resolve artifact.Missing:1)
> > > org.apache.wicket:wicket-parent:jar:1.3.0-beta2" (same for beta3).
> > >
> > > Does work when trying to download directly from:
> > > http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.wicket/wicket-parenteither.
> > >
> > > Not sure if it was someone on the list here that did the initial
> > install, if
> > > so, could you take a look?
> > >
> > > Craig.
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
> > Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta3 is released
> > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta3/
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>


-- 
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta3 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta3/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: 1.3.0-beta2/3 broken in the m2 repo?

2007-09-12 Thread Craig Tataryn
Interesting.  Well I assumed that by depending on it, it would pull in all
the right dependencies.  You see, when you just link to groupId=
org.apache.wicket artifactId=wicket you don't get any dependencies and
ultimately your webapp fails.

In my mind the power of maven is to provide that "yum-like" nature of
resolving a dependency and all of it's dependencies, and so on.

Craig.

On 9/12/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> there are 2 things wrong with your approach:
>
> 1. wicket-parent is not a jar, so you should have used an additional
> pom
> 2. wicket-parent is not a jar, so you should not try to depend on it
> in the first place
>
> Why are you trying to depend on wicket-parent?
>
> Martijn
>
> On 9/12/07, Craig Tataryn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Tried grabbing:
> >
> > 
> > org.apache.wicket
> > wicket-parent
> > 1.3.0-beta3
> > 
> >
> > And then:
> >
> > 
> > org.apache.wicket
> > wicket-parent
> > 1.3.0-beta2
> > 
> >
> > Each bomb with the "Failed to resolve artifact.Missing:1)
> > org.apache.wicket:wicket-parent:jar:1.3.0-beta2" (same for beta3).
> >
> > Does work when trying to download directly from:
> > http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.wicket/wicket-parenteither.
> >
> > Not sure if it was someone on the list here that did the initial
> install, if
> > so, could you take a look?
> >
> > Craig.
> >
>
>
> --
> Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
> Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta3 is released
> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta3/
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


Re: 1.3.0-beta2/3 broken in the m2 repo?

2007-09-12 Thread Martijn Dashorst
there are 2 things wrong with your approach:

1. wicket-parent is not a jar, so you should have used an additional
pom
2. wicket-parent is not a jar, so you should not try to depend on it
in the first place

Why are you trying to depend on wicket-parent?

Martijn

On 9/12/07, Craig Tataryn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tried grabbing:
>
> 
> org.apache.wicket
> wicket-parent
> 1.3.0-beta3
> 
>
> And then:
>
> 
> org.apache.wicket
> wicket-parent
> 1.3.0-beta2
> 
>
> Each bomb with the "Failed to resolve artifact.Missing:1)
> org.apache.wicket:wicket-parent:jar:1.3.0-beta2" (same for beta3).
>
> Does work when trying to download directly from:
> http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.wicket/wicket-parent either.
>
> Not sure if it was someone on the list here that did the initial install, if
> so, could you take a look?
>
> Craig.
>


-- 
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta3 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta3/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: 1.3.0-beta2/3 broken in the m2 repo?

2007-09-11 Thread Craig Tataryn
"Does work when trying to download directly from"

Meant "Doesn't" not Does.

On 9/11/07, Craig Tataryn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Tried grabbing:
>
> 
> org.apache.wicket
> wicket-parent
> 1.3.0-beta3
> 
>
> And then:
>
> 
> org.apache.wicket
> wicket-parent
> 1.3.0-beta2
> 
>
> Each bomb with the "Failed to resolve artifact.Missing:1)
> org.apache.wicket:wicket-parent:jar:1.3.0-beta2" (same for beta3).
>
> Does work when trying to download directly from:
> http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.wicket/wicket-parent either.
>
> Not sure if it was someone on the list here that did the initial install,
> if so, could you take a look?
>
> Craig.
>


1.3.0-beta2/3 broken in the m2 repo?

2007-09-11 Thread Craig Tataryn
Tried grabbing:


org.apache.wicket
wicket-parent
1.3.0-beta3


And then:


org.apache.wicket
wicket-parent
1.3.0-beta2


Each bomb with the "Failed to resolve artifact.Missing:1)
org.apache.wicket:wicket-parent:jar:1.3.0-beta2" (same for beta3).

Does work when trying to download directly from:
http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.wicket/wicket-parent either.

Not sure if it was someone on the list here that did the initial install, if
so, could you take a look?

Craig.