> > you are meant to look at examples first. they cover all the basic
> > usecases. learn-by-example has been our philosophy so far.
> >
> > honestly spoken, this is not the best strategy for everyone...
>
>
> no, it is not. we never claimed it was. but it does seem to work for
> most people and
> No, actually I was not aware of that, was waiting for the Wicket in
> Action book...
http://manning.com/dashorst/
You can get the first chapters now. Two more chapters will be released
early next week.
> maybe one should also start writing some proper articles as a starting
> point; I might do
On 8/9/07, Alexander Schatten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> > you are more then welcome to help out.
> >
>
> right, but currently I am so confused that I probably would not be of
> much help except for expressing where I am confused and hoping that this
> might help fixing s
> honestly spoken, this is not the best strategy for everyone...
Obviously. But we have limited resources (no-one is paid for working
on Wicket), so it is hard to cater to everyone. We have tried to
attract writers (for a reference guide) from the very early start
(even offered some money) but it
I am sorry I do completly understand your last mail. See, you pointed me
to the interesting page
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/framework-documentation.html
(1) now, from the wicket website the reference link (was changed I
think?) points to the other page, with the similar information. It mig
I think Alexander had the same initial confusion as I did.
The link: http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/framework-documentation.html
leads to the same information as the reference library but starts at a
different level in the wiki pages. So I thought at first that there
was two similar wiki pages with
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
sorry, but Wicket experience was far away from beeing pleasent. I am
quite willing to check several sources, but this here is really bad.
have you gotten the Pro Wicket book?
No, actually I was not aware of that, was waiting for the Wicket in
Action book...
outdat
so how do you propose we consolidate it?
instead of javadoc have links to the wiki?
/**
* see wicket.apache.org/wiki/authstrat
*/
public interface IAuthorizationStrategy {...}
that would really really suck.
-igor
On 8/9/07, Alexander Schatten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Martijn Dashorst
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/framework-documentation.html
sorry, I sent the last email to quick, was a Mistake; what I wanted to
point out is this:
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/framework-documentation.html
this is your link, and it apparently has interesting inf
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/framework-documentation.html
thank you; but you see, this is again one of the things I mentioned!!
when you follow the link (wiki) from the main Wicket page, you come here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/reference-library.html
the link
On 8/8/07, Alexander Schatten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Greetings to all Wicket experts
>
> I try to get Wicket running for some rather simple web-application.
> First (no offense, but have to say that), Wicket has the worst
> documentation of an apparently good open source project I have seen
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/framework-documentation.html
On 8/9/07, Alexander Schatten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I completly agree; just one addition: best-practices are completly
> missing in the introduction. at least a list what is available!!
>
> how should I know, that there is apparent
I completly agree; just one addition: best-practices are completly
missing in the introduction. at least a list what is available!!
how should I know, that there is apparently an authentication framework?
how do I access DAOs properly? there is support for working with
databases (is there?)
I have been playing with wicket for the last week. I must agree with
what Alexander says. The documentation is rather lacking and quite
frustrating. To bad because wicket is cool. So +1 for better docs.
As a newbie to wicket I can't help in writing it but I can tell you
what I find frustrating:
Th
I'll let one of the developers go into more detail about the
documentation issue :)
Regarding security there are several sub projects for you to choose.
and i would like to refer to this page for an overview of the
differences
http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Security+Framework+
Greetings to all Wicket experts
I try to get Wicket running for some rather simple web-application.
First (no offense, but have to say that), Wicket has the worst
documentation of an apparently good open source project I have seen in a
long time; and this is really a pity, because it seems, th
16 matches
Mail list logo
