Re: Pure client side validation

2008-10-02 Thread Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
something I would look into at some point.. Maybe the way would be to upgrade the fvalidate integration to current wicket version? harrypitt wrote: Ok, my question was not clear enough. With "Pure client side validation" i mean a javascript validation which needs no ajax requests. Of co

Re: Pure client side validation

2008-10-02 Thread Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
current wicket version? harrypitt wrote: Ok, my question was not clear enough. With "Pure client side validation" i mean a javascript validation which needs no ajax requests. Of course there should be always a server side validation and the whole default Wicket form-handling AFTER the

Re: Pure client side validation

2008-10-02 Thread Igor Vaynberg
ons about this topic: > - Are there any example implementations for such client side validations? dont think so, maybe you can create one > - There is also a Wicket-Stuff project "fvalidate": Has this project a > different concept? i think that project is defunct, fvalidate has

Re: Pure client side validation

2008-10-02 Thread harrypitt
Ok, my question was not clear enough. With "Pure client side validation" i mean a javascript validation which needs no ajax requests. Of course there should be always a server side validation and the whole default Wicket form-handling AFTER the submit. It would be really stupid to ju

Re: Pure client side validation

2008-10-02 Thread Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
have some additional questions about this topic: - Are there any example implementations for such client side validations? - There is also a Wicket-Stuff project "fvalidate": Has this project a different concept? - Is there a plan to integrate pure client side validation in the wicket framew

Re: Pure client side validation

2008-10-02 Thread harrypitt
ions about this topic: - Are there any example implementations for such client side validations? - There is also a Wicket-Stuff project "fvalidate": Has this project a different concept? - Is there a plan to integrate pure client side validation in the wicket framework soon? Harry

Re: Pure client side validation

2008-09-30 Thread Igor Vaynberg
validators: > > textField.add(new ClientSideRequiredValidator()); > > I know that this topic was discussed in the mailing list many times, but i > haven't found a real solution for this. > > Harry > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabb

Re: Pure client side validation

2008-09-30 Thread pixologe
list many times, but i > haven't found a real solution for this. > > Harry > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Pure-client-side-validation-tp19737383p19740821.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -

Pure client side validation

2008-09-30 Thread harrypitt
list many times, but i haven't found a real solution for this. Harry -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Pure-client-side-validation-tp19737383p19737383.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list a