Great! Thanks a lot!
Regards,
Pierre
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> Hi Pierre,
>
> Take a look at
> https://github.com/martin-g/wicket-native-websocket-example/blob/master/src/main/resources/org/apache/wicket/websocket/jetty/example/client.js
>
> There is Wicket.Web
Hi Pierre,
Take a look at
https://github.com/martin-g/wicket-native-websocket-example/blob/master/src/main/resources/org/apache/wicket/websocket/jetty/example/client.js
There is Wicket.WebSocket object which basically wraps native
window.WebSocket just to be able to intercept the calls and send
From: Tom Eugelink [mailto:t...@tbee.org]
Sent: vrijdag 13 april 2012 14:44
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: wicket 6.0
On 2012-04-13 14:24, Martin Grigorov wrote:
How many of you tried beta1 ?
I started off with 6, but was afraid things like wiquery would conflict in the
usage of jq
Hi Tom,
We now have a working WiQuery 6. I will release a new snapshot tonight, but you
can clone it from github already.
Hielke
-Original Message-
From: Tom Eugelink [mailto:t...@tbee.org]
Sent: vrijdag 13 april 2012 14:44
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: wicket 6.0
On 2012
hi martin-g ,
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1175
please check my comment on it...
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Francois Meillet
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I use 6, everything is ok but I encounter a problem with DatePicker.
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Francois Meillet
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I use 6, everything is ok but I encounter a problem with DatePicker.
> No event when there is an update.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4496
This is a problem in 1.5.x too so it is not 6.x specific.
>
> François
Hi,
I use 6, everything is ok but I encounter a problem with DatePicker.
No event when there is an update.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4496
François
Le 13 avr. 2012 à 14:24, Martin Grigorov a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> beta1 has been released at March 26 and so far there were 3 ticket
Hi Tom
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Tom Eugelink wrote:
>
> On 2012-04-13 14:24, Martin Grigorov wrote:
>>
>>
>> How many of you tried beta1 ?
>>
>
> I started off with 6, but was afraid things like wiquery would conflict in
> the usage of jquery, so I returned to safety using 1.5.5. Should t
On 2012-04-13 14:24, Martin Grigorov wrote:
How many of you tried beta1 ?
I started off with 6, but was afraid things like wiquery would conflict in the
usage of jquery, so I returned to safety using 1.5.5. Should that be a problem?
Otherwise I'll upgrade back to 6.
Tom
---
Hi,
beta1 has been released at March 26 and so far there were 3 tickets
for it. 2 of them made small API improvements.
So it is either rock solid or there are not that many users of it.
I think it is stable enough for RC but we wanted to receive more
feedback about the changes because we'd like t
Hi Thomas,
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Thomas Götz wrote:
> This will cause quite some trouble for the application I'm currently
> developing.
>
> Example:
> we have a Behavior that puts "input hints" on several textfields (e.g.
> dd/mm/ for day input fields). The Behavior provides a
This will cause quite some trouble for the application I'm currently developing.
Example:
we have a Behavior that puts "input hints" on several textfields (e.g.
dd/mm/ for day input fields). The Behavior provides a JS file in which we
register for the "submit" event of the containing form an
Hi,
The new code registers listeners with jQuery's on() method which uses
internally addEventListener() (IE9 and others) and attachEvent() (IE8
and less).
So you need to execute your JS code after Wicket's.
Wicket executes its bindings when the DOM is ready, so you must be
careful that your Mootoo
done. thank martin.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4328
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-6-0-JavaScriptFilteredIntoFooterHeaderResponse-CssHeaderItem-tp4274687p4276477.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.c
Hi Rob,
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 8:12 AM, robert.mcguinness
wrote:
> kk, got it working again by overriding
> /CssAcceptingHeaderResponseFilter#accepts/
>
> /item instanceof CssHeaderItem || item instanceof PageHeaderItem/
>
> also, for some js frameworks like *modernizr.js* and *respond.js*, they
kk, got it working again by overriding
/CssAcceptingHeaderResponseFilter#accepts/
/item instanceof CssHeaderItem || item instanceof PageHeaderItem/
also, for some js frameworks like *modernizr.js* and *respond.js*, they
require these libs to live in the in the tag. to target the head
bucket
16 matches
Mail list logo
