RE: Status of wicketstuff jquery integration
WiQuery does depend on a small amount of libraries, we are working on minimizing this for Wicket 6. Have fun. Hielke -Original Message- From: Jesse Long [mailto:j...@unknown.za.net] Sent: woensdag 9 mei 2012 16:00 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Status of wicketstuff jquery integration Hi Hielke, It seems I was using an outdated version of WiQuery (1.2.3), but even then, I cant reproduce the extra 10M. It may be that I had the dependencies for WiQuery and something else added to the war at the same time, my apologies. wiquery-core 1.5.5 (and dependencies) adds just over 2MB new quickstart. (Probably worth it). Cheers, Jesse On 09/05/2012 10:38, Hielke Hoeve wrote: > Hi Jesse, > > Your 10mb of WiQuery puzzles me. The wiquery-core jar is 256 KB and the > wiquery-jquery-ui jar is 857KB. I wonder which jars you include in your war. > If you do not use jQuery UI then there is no need for wiquery-jquery-ui. > > Hielke > > -Original Message- > From: Jesse Long [mailto:j...@unknown.za.net] > Sent: woensdag 2 mei 2012 10:48 > To: users@wicket.apache.org > Subject: Status of wicketstuff jquery integration > > Hi All, > > I'm interested in using features of the jquery integration in wicketstuff, > but it seems it is not being maintained. The version of jquery packaged with > the wicketstuff-jquery jar seems to be 1.3.2, which is quite old already. Am > I missing something? Is there a preferred way of integrating jquery into > wicket? > > (WiQuery adds 10Mb to my war. JQWicket looks good, but why choose it over > wicketstuff-jquery)? > > I also note that the wicketstuff-jquery project does not make use of the > wicketstuff-jslibraries project. Why not? Is wicketstuff-jslibraries the > officially recommended way of including js libraries, or should I look > elsewhere? wicketstuff-jquery method of detecting jquery.js presence seems > like a hack. > > Thanks, > Jesse > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Status of wicketstuff jquery integration
Hi Hielke, It seems I was using an outdated version of WiQuery (1.2.3), but even then, I cant reproduce the extra 10M. It may be that I had the dependencies for WiQuery and something else added to the war at the same time, my apologies. wiquery-core 1.5.5 (and dependencies) adds just over 2MB new quickstart. (Probably worth it). Cheers, Jesse On 09/05/2012 10:38, Hielke Hoeve wrote: Hi Jesse, Your 10mb of WiQuery puzzles me. The wiquery-core jar is 256 KB and the wiquery-jquery-ui jar is 857KB. I wonder which jars you include in your war. If you do not use jQuery UI then there is no need for wiquery-jquery-ui. Hielke -Original Message- From: Jesse Long [mailto:j...@unknown.za.net] Sent: woensdag 2 mei 2012 10:48 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Status of wicketstuff jquery integration Hi All, I'm interested in using features of the jquery integration in wicketstuff, but it seems it is not being maintained. The version of jquery packaged with the wicketstuff-jquery jar seems to be 1.3.2, which is quite old already. Am I missing something? Is there a preferred way of integrating jquery into wicket? (WiQuery adds 10Mb to my war. JQWicket looks good, but why choose it over wicketstuff-jquery)? I also note that the wicketstuff-jquery project does not make use of the wicketstuff-jslibraries project. Why not? Is wicketstuff-jslibraries the officially recommended way of including js libraries, or should I look elsewhere? wicketstuff-jquery method of detecting jquery.js presence seems like a hack. Thanks, Jesse - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: Status of wicketstuff jquery integration
Hi Jesse, Your 10mb of WiQuery puzzles me. The wiquery-core jar is 256 KB and the wiquery-jquery-ui jar is 857KB. I wonder which jars you include in your war. If you do not use jQuery UI then there is no need for wiquery-jquery-ui. Hielke -Original Message- From: Jesse Long [mailto:j...@unknown.za.net] Sent: woensdag 2 mei 2012 10:48 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Status of wicketstuff jquery integration Hi All, I'm interested in using features of the jquery integration in wicketstuff, but it seems it is not being maintained. The version of jquery packaged with the wicketstuff-jquery jar seems to be 1.3.2, which is quite old already. Am I missing something? Is there a preferred way of integrating jquery into wicket? (WiQuery adds 10Mb to my war. JQWicket looks good, but why choose it over wicketstuff-jquery)? I also note that the wicketstuff-jquery project does not make use of the wicketstuff-jslibraries project. Why not? Is wicketstuff-jslibraries the officially recommended way of including js libraries, or should I look elsewhere? wicketstuff-jquery method of detecting jquery.js presence seems like a hack. Thanks, Jesse - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Status of wicketstuff jquery integration
As a fairly newbie to Wicket I also found the JQuery integration most confusing (and have abandoned it for now). Too many projects trying to do the same, with only half a documentation and half of the components. IMHO, with Wicket 6 ready using jquery for its Ajax (as I understand it), it could be very wise to more formally adopt JQuery, similar to wicket extentions or DateTime. Tom - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Status of wicketstuff jquery integration
Try this: http://code.google.com/p/jqwicket/ Allow high/low level jQuery/UI access. (sometimes low level JavaScripting is required). Tried all libraries you mentioned but JqWicket looks to be the most promising. To make my life easier I modified it, JQBehavior extends AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior (instead Behavior). stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Status of wicketstuff jquery integration
Hi Jesse? Add this to your list of options http://www.7thweb.net/ http://www.7thweb.net/jquery-ui-samples/ Josh. On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Jesse Long wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm interested in using features of the jquery integration in wicketstuff, > but it seems it is not being maintained. The version of jquery packaged > with the wicketstuff-jquery jar seems to be 1.3.2, which is quite old > already. Am I missing something? Is there a preferred way of integrating > jquery into wicket? > > (WiQuery adds 10Mb to my war. JQWicket looks good, but why choose it over > wicketstuff-jquery)? > > I also note that the wicketstuff-jquery project does not make use of the > wicketstuff-jslibraries project. Why not? Is wicketstuff-jslibraries the > officially recommended way of including js libraries, or should I look > elsewhere? wicketstuff-jquery method of detecting jquery.js presence seems > like a hack. > > Thanks, > Jesse > > --**--**- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >
Status of wicketstuff jquery integration
Hi All, I'm interested in using features of the jquery integration in wicketstuff, but it seems it is not being maintained. The version of jquery packaged with the wicketstuff-jquery jar seems to be 1.3.2, which is quite old already. Am I missing something? Is there a preferred way of integrating jquery into wicket? (WiQuery adds 10Mb to my war. JQWicket looks good, but why choose it over wicketstuff-jquery)? I also note that the wicketstuff-jquery project does not make use of the wicketstuff-jslibraries project. Why not? Is wicketstuff-jslibraries the officially recommended way of including js libraries, or should I look elsewhere? wicketstuff-jquery method of detecting jquery.js presence seems like a hack. Thanks, Jesse - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
