Re: The vision of Wicket 6
Okay. Thank you both for the short explanation. I've got the feeling that migrating an existing 1.5 project to Wicket 6 will be a pain. But obviously it will not. Cheers. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/The-vision-of-Wicket-6-tp4437649p4438216.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
The vision of Wicket 6
Just a non-technical question. We're using Wicket 1.4.x and 1.5.x in different projects and we're feeling quite confident (at least me) using this framework. By the way, it might be not quite easy migrating an existing wicket 1.4 project to wicket 1.5. But that's not the point. I've noticed, that the guys are working on a new wicket version, called Wicket 6.0. What is the aim of Wicket 6? What is the vision with wicket 6? Why this major release number? Is Wicket 6 not just a Wicket 2? Is closer to wicket 1.5 than the version number 6 will -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/The-vision-of-Wicket-6-tp4437642p4437642.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
The vision of Wicket 6
Just a non-technical question. We're using Wicket 1.4.x and 1.5.x in different projects and we're feeling quite confident (at least me) using this framework. By the way, it might be not quite easy migrating an existing wicket 1.4 project to wicket 1.5. But that's not the point. I've noticed, that the guys are working on a new wicket version, called Wicket 6.0. What is the aim of Wicket 6? What is the vision with wicket 6? Why this major release number? Is Wicket 6 not just a Wicket 2? Is not the API closer to wicket 1.5 than the version number 6 will suggest? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/The-vision-of-Wicket-6-tp4437649p4437649.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: The vision of Wicket 6
Hi Dirk, starting with Wicket 6 we'll adhere to semantic versioning (see http://semver.org) , thus the big leap in the version number. Is not the API closer to wicket 1.5 than the version number 6 will suggest? I'd say that version 6.0.0 will be closer to 1.5.x than 1.5.0 was to 1.4.x. Depending on what features you use intensively your mileage may vary though. Hope this helps Sven On 03/02/2012 08:09 AM, Dirk Forchel wrote: Just a non-technical question. We're using Wicket 1.4.x and 1.5.x in different projects and we're feeling quite confident (at least me) using this framework. By the way, it might be not quite easy migrating an existing wicket 1.4 project to wicket 1.5. But that's not the point. I've noticed, that the guys are working on a new wicket version, called Wicket 6.0. What is the aim of Wicket 6? What is the vision with wicket 6? Why this major release number? Is Wicket 6 not just a Wicket 2? Is not the API closer to wicket 1.5 than the version number 6 will suggest? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/The-vision-of-Wicket-6-tp4437649p4437649.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: The vision of Wicket 6
Hi, Here is the roadmap for 6.0: https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/wicket-60-roadmap.html Wicket 2.0 has been already used for an experimental branch (in the time 1.2 was the production version) so it cannot be reused. Wicket 6.0 will require JDK 6 so we decided to follow SUN : JDK 1.5 - JDK 6.0 :-) Wicket 7.0 may or may not require JDK 7.0 as minimum. On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Sven Meier s...@meiers.net wrote: Hi Dirk, starting with Wicket 6 we'll adhere to semantic versioning (see http://semver.org) , thus the big leap in the version number. Is not the API closer to wicket 1.5 than the version number 6 will suggest? I'd say that version 6.0.0 will be closer to 1.5.x than 1.5.0 was to 1.4.x. Depending on what features you use intensively your mileage may vary though. Hope this helps Sven On 03/02/2012 08:09 AM, Dirk Forchel wrote: Just a non-technical question. We're using Wicket 1.4.x and 1.5.x in different projects and we're feeling quite confident (at least me) using this framework. By the way, it might be not quite easy migrating an existing wicket 1.4 project to wicket 1.5. But that's not the point. I've noticed, that the guys are working on a new wicket version, called Wicket 6.0. What is the aim of Wicket 6? What is the vision with wicket 6? Why this major release number? Is Wicket 6 not just a Wicket 2? Is not the API closer to wicket 1.5 than the version number 6 will suggest? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/The-vision-of-Wicket-6-tp4437649p4437649.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
